Marxists use "controlled opposition" to create political drama - people like Kessler, Hitler, and "weev" who are politically ambiguous. Links from new NYT left-racist editor Sarah Jeong to "weev" are like fresh deer-track to us commie hunters. #Marxist
dailycaller.com/2018/08/02/new…
One might ask how actors such as "weev" are controlled. I'm not going to say right now, but you will figure it out by the end of this thread. It's a Question you can think about.
First, some background on who this woman is, who was just hired as an editor at the Failing New York Times. Note that she is being hired as the LEAD WRITER on technology. I kid you not. But wait - it gets better.
nytco.com/sarah-jeong-jo…
Take a look at her background described in the previous link. This woman has passed through so many KGB-CIA recruiting centers and Marx-pounce watering holes, that it would be an absolute miracle if she wasn't a full-fledged Obamacommie.
Harvard Law with GENDER-STUDY CLUSTERS.
So it's not surprising that she has some left-wing baggage.
But then somebody found this little collection of nasty. Personally, I don't have a problem with left-racist speech. I believe in free speech - even for commies.
AND FOR ME TO GO AFTER THEM.
The Daily Caller has a great article on the discovery of her BEYOND TOXIC leftist baggage, and the reaction of a few "old white men".
dailycaller.com/2018/08/02/new…
If you see nothing else, David Burge's reaction is worth savoring.
But HERE we find odd links between Jeong and "weev". This gal had interesting contacts with somebody I regard as a PIED PIPER CONSTRUCT of the LEFT.
What I want this nugget of info to do is to SHAKE UP your ideas about right and left in a BIG WAY.
dailycaller.com/2018/08/02/new…
And THIS is where the rabbit-hole takes a REALLY weird turn. It turns out that this whole "yikes-level woman NYT tech editor hire who tweeted outrageously and had a relationship with weev" thing is DEJA VU, because it ALREADY HAPPENED.
I kid you not.
Just read the comments on that article, but read a lot of them, because there are MAJOR CONFLICTS right and left, no pun intended. This woman sounds like more of a conflicto than Bradley/Chelsea Manning.
Among many tweets bashing her left and right....
Take your pick on whose version of Quinn Norton's FIRING to read. Daily Caller...
dailycaller.com/2018/02/14/new…
...the evil HuffPo....
huffingtonpost.com/entry/ny-times…
....or Wired Magazine.
Like they say, it's complicated.
After all - how does a den of commies like NYT hire a journalist with impeccable leftist cred, but also manipulative contacts on the pied piper right, and not have their "useful ambiguity" outed?
wired.com/story/the-ny-t…
At this point you may be wondering why the NYT seems so desperate to put a WOMAN in charge of tech coverage. To some extent, Quinn Norton's would-be job description gives it away.
...to write about “the power, culture, and consequences of technology.”
It's ALL about CONTROL.
BUT WAIT - THERE'S MOAR
Yes. Women are incredibly useful in the dweeby male-centric autist tech area because....
They're WOMEN.
Sex sells, but in a world of the extremely thirsty, it sells DAMN NEAR ANYTHING.
This "journalism" award show. I simply FACE-PALM at the CONTROL.
When you read my discussion of women in tech, you have to TALK BACK to the leftist conditioning that any confrontation of their dogmas is "sexist". Remember - the left USES gender and USES race to ADVANCE POLITICS. The left advances CERTAIN women in or into tech to CONTROL IT.
Ah - sweet memories.
Yahoo, Obamacare website, tech partnership.
Yahoo, hack by DNC collusion nations, DOJ to the "rescue".
Yahoo, dossier, attack Trump.
This lady had NO CLUE. None. PC literally BLINDS people to who their friends and their enemies really are. It's SAD.
Circling back, remember that journalists are an essential part of leftist control. It is necessary for the left to control not just the conversation itself, but the SUBJECT OF CONVERSATION - what you CHOOSE TO TALK ABOUT.
Control that, and you TRULY control the conversation.
With that in mind, watch the first 10 minutes of this video (before an interesting main topic of secret societies). The speaker - a historian - talks about why the left loves to send its people into journalism - and has for CENTURIES.
CONTROL THE VIEW
By now, you understand why I DO NOT look to "TECH-MSM" for anything other than SMH at "FOMO on cool kid buzz". Frankly, I get a better sense of REAL technological direction talking to people on Twitter, Gab (@getongab), and CTH (@TheLastRefuge2).
/end
Share this Scrolly Tale with your friends.
A Scrolly Tale is a new way to read Twitter threads with a more visually immersive experience.
Discover more beautiful Scrolly Tales like this.