Christiaan Triebert Profile picture
Visual Investigations at @nytimes. Previously @bellingcat, @airwars. Retired hitchhiker. Learn digital verification in a fun way → @quiztime.

Apr 14, 2018, 13 tweets

This is NOT recent footage of the #SyriaStrikes, but recycled footage from May *2013* from an alleged Israeli airstrike on the Jamraya Research Center in Damascus.

This video is being shared countless of times as showing today's #SyriaStrikes in Damascus, but guess what? It's not — the footage shows shelling in the Ukrainian city of Luhansk in February 2015.

This video is being shared many times too, claiming to show today's #SyriaStrikes on the Jamraya Research Centre in Damascus. The footage does appear to show that location, but not in 2018 — this was broadcast in May 2013 after an alleged Israeli strike.

This video is being shared as showing air defences firing at today's incoming #SyriaStrikes in Damascus, but guess what? That's not the case — the footage shows Saudi Patriot missiles intercepting an apparent Houthi missile over Riyadh last month.

This video also claims to show Syrian air defences at work against today's incoming #SyriaStrikes. But again, that's not the case. The video was uploaded already four years ago and appears to be related to the 2014 Gaza-Israel conflict.

Hey @MSNBC, the video you just broadcast as being from today's #SyriaStrikes in Damascus was actually filmed in the Ukrainian city of Luhansk over three years ago.

Really. How hard is it to either (1) fact-check videos before broadcasting them or (2) deciding not to broadcast them if you can't verify the content? Here's a @Bellingcat guide on advanced video verification: bellingcat.com/resources/how-…. And h/t @TheAvroPost for the screenshot.

What's worse than sharing old videos as being from today's #SyriaStrikes? Sharing old images — a reverse image search literally takes a few seconds. This image is from the first wave of attacks on March 21, 2003, in Baghdad, Iraq.

This image is being shared as showing a Russian S-300 targeted by #SyriaStrikes — while it indeed shows that specific long range surface-to-air missile system, it is actually an *inverted* image from August 2016 when a S-300 failed during an exercise. shaked-il.livejournal.com/127362.html

Hey @skynewsarabia, you're broadcasting a four-year-old video as being from today's #SyriaStrikes in Damascus.

This picture is being shared as showing a by Syria intercepted American/British/French missile of the #SyriaStrikes. But it doesn't look like any of that. Instead, it strongly resembles a Soviet air-to-air missile, the AA-6 ACRID R-40. H/t @pfc_joker.

The parts of (two) AA-6 ACRID R-40 air-to-air missiles may actually just be junk at for example Tiyas Military Airport, and may not have been fired at all.

And of course, there is more.

Share this Scrolly Tale with your friends.

A Scrolly Tale is a new way to read Twitter threads with a more visually immersive experience.
Discover more beautiful Scrolly Tales like this.

Keep scrolling