For the migrant rights project that I’m working on with @LawCentres I spoke with Jamila from @ATLEUnit about their amazing work seeking redress for trafficking survivors.
Jamila gave me a mini-masterclass on trafficking compensation claims. Her positivity, despite the ‘hostile environment’, was refreshing.
Some of her clients are initially scared to take action and seek redress. Some fear accessing basic services like the police or doctor’s surgery, even when they need it badly.
Overcoming that fear is a very slow, detailed and complex process.
It’s a time of possibility for those seeking redress for trafficking victims. There are multiple avenues for claimants to explore (Employment Tribunal, civil courts, criminal procedures, claims against the state or sometimes all of the above).
But for all the great work of @ATLEUnit and their colleagues at @Kalayaan & @Hopeforjustice, there’s still huge demand for more trafficking compensation claims to be brought.
Claimants often face procedural hurdles. Limitation laws can be a big issue. They restrict the ability of trafficking survivors to seek compensation over many years of exploitation and abuse.
Jamila's work is unphased by Brexit. Her focus is on ringfencing a body of case law principles that can withstand future legal changes. That approach seems to be working so far.
Here are some of the advantages of that explained...
Quick plug: @ATLEUnit's new online resource is called ATHUB, full of practical tips and guidance. I highly recommend it. Was essential for the ebook I wrote for @LawCentres. athub.org.uk
Phew, thanks for reading! Watch the full-length (15 min) interview here: lawmostly.com/2018/06/01/new…
Please share / RT and so on.
(ends)
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/ Some reasons why the Domino’s pizza dismissal case has some disturbing features for employers / lawyers / claimants.
(thread) lawmostly.com/2018/07/03/dom…
2/ It shows that the lynchpin of Theresa’ May’s #hostileenvironment policy, (the ‘right to work’ system), is causing confusion for employers, staff and Judges.
3/ If Judges are confused about the 'right to work' system, what hope is there for employers who face potential fines of up to £20,000 per illegal worker and potential criminal prosecution?