It has come to our attention that some people are suggesting that "dog paper" was accepted because reviewers are busy people and
"is same as physics journal accepting a paper with fake data"
To dispel such notions, we shall publish reviewer comments to Dog rape paper.
[thread]
It starts off slow and fairly optimistic, with paper being rejected (they almost dodged the bullet here, didn't theEE
EEE wait a minute... oh... oh wow, "animals and black feminist geographies", now that's an unfortunate turn of phrase...