Hello #FaithfullyLGBT. It’s #PrideMonth and bigots are out in droves throwing Leviticus 18:22 and 20:13 at us.
That means it’s time for a thread about why they’re wrong, and how to read Leviticus from a place of love.
First of all, the Old Testament God is not the problem. God has never hated us.
Speaking as a rabbi, what Christians call the Old Testament is what I call the Bible.
I’m unequivocally LGBTQ-afffirming. The Hebrew Bible is not the problem.
Affirming Christians: We need each other.
Please don’t try to fight anti-LGBTQ bigotry with antisemitism.
I read the Bible in general and the Five Books of Moses in particular as telling the story of God learning to be God, and people and God learning to be in relationship to one another.
The idea that God is infallible and knew everything from the beginning is flat-out not supported by anything in the Five Books of Moses.
The Bible is a record of sacred learning. That learning is still happening today.
We need to bring our whole selves to sacred learning. Everything we know is Torah. If we treat anything as too secular to be relevant in a faith context, we’re doing it wrong.
Getting back to Leviticus 18:22 and 20:13 specifically: They’re obscure verses. I don’t think that anyone knows for sure what they mean — but they cannot possibly be referring to gay relationships or gay people.
The Biblical Hebrew word תועבה is more-or-less untranslatable. ‘Abomination’ doesn’t capture it. It has a ritual connotation that only makes sense when you have a cultic sacrificial system that has to be operated properly to prevent disaster.
The word תועבה is *not* the word normally used to describe sexual prohibitions. It *is* a word commonly used to describe things that should not be offered as sacrifices.
That’s what I think we’re probably talking about here.
Eg: Ex 8:26 KJV
“And Moses said, It is not meet so to do; for we shall sacrifice the abomination of the Egyptians to the LORD our God: lo, shall we sacrifice the abomination of the Egyptians before their eyes, and will they not stone us?”
This is about sheep.
My guess is that there was some sort of sexualized idolatrous ritual that involved having one of the men involved play the role of a woman.
We’re not allowed to do that ritual or serve that god. And, in fact, no one does.
The prohibitions were so successful that we no longer even know quite what they were.
To the point that they do not show up in Biblical narrative.
(Sodom isn’t an instance of this prohibition and does not use this language. That was about inhospitality.)
To the extent that this prohibition is still relevant, we could read it as a prohibition against misgendering people, especially in sexually degrading terms like “who’s the man and who’s the woman?”
Gay men aren’t women. Bi men aren’t women. Women are women.
Love is good.
There’s another prohibition in Leviticus that we should be thinking about in #FaithfullyLGBT advocacy: 19:16 “Do not spread slander among your people; do not stand idly by the blood of your fellow; I am YHVH.”
Do not spread slander about LGBTQ people by comparing loving relationships to long-defunct obscure ancient idolatrous rites.
Do not stand idly by the blood of your fellow by teaching LGBTQ people to hate themselves and their capacity for love.
And remember that if you slander LGBTQ people, incite hatred, and destroy lives, this verse says that you will have God to answer to.
/thread
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
An additional comment on the sexual abuse scandals in the news: This is a reason that I'm skeptical about the idea of replacing the criminal system with something like Restorative Justice.
Here's the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops, advocating for a Restorative Justice approach: usccb.org/issues-and-act…
Do you trust United Conference of Catholic Bishops to be acting in good faith when they say "A Catholic approach leads us to encourage models of restorative justice that seek to address crime in terms of the harm done to victims and communities, not simply as a violation of law"?
If you attribute the abusiveness of Catholic priests to celibacy, you’re effectively saying that you expect Catholic women to protect children by absorbing sexual violence from men. Please don’t do that.
Because you know another thing that the Catholic Church knows about and has chosen to enable? Violent fathers and violent husbands. The problem isn’t celibacy, it’s patriarchy. And that’s not a uniquely Catholic problem.
Attributing the problem to celibacy allows non-Catholics to exoticize it. It gives people a way to say “our clergy aren’t celibate; we don’t have that problem”, instead of acknowledging the violent patriarchy problem that we absolutely do have.
An Elul challenge for Jewish women: Treat Jewish feminism as part of your teshuva. Think about the role that antisemitism and misogyny play in your life, how both might be barriers to being who you want to be in the world, and what you might be able to do about it.
Jewish women are taught to hate ourselves in all kinds of ways blatant and subtle. (If I had a dollar for every time I've been told that Israel is just like Nazi Germany or that women's ordination destroyed American Judaism, I'd have a lot less student debt.)
In mainstream English-speaking culture, it is rarely socially acceptable to talk about Judaism with the assumption that Judaism is valuable and that Jews can be happy and like being Jewish. Especially if you are a woman. What if we violated that taboo?
Deuteronomy starts "These are the words that Moses addressed to all Israel on the other side of the Jordan.". That means it's time for a thread about Moses' words and voice from a disability perspective.
When Moses was first appointed by God at the burning bush, he was reluctant, and expressed several objections, most of which boiled down to: "I am not someone who others will listen to." At the end of the encounter, Moses makes this very explicit:
Ex 4:10 But Moses said to YHVH , “Please, O Lord, I have never been a man of words, either in times past or now that You have spoken to Your servant; I am slow of speech and slow of tongue.”
I normally never bring up Israel when people talk about antisemitism in other countries, but I’m going to make an exception and talk about what it’s like to be a Jewish woman who wears a yarmulke in public.
Specifically: I am a rabbi. I wear a yarmulke almost everywhere I go. This attracts both antisemitic and misogynistic harassment.
I often hear esteemed male leaders opine that it’s a tremendous relief to spend time in Israel, because it’s so socially comfortable to express their Judaism visibly.
Thank you for this question, @SheerHubris. I have a lot of thoughts about this, so I'm responding in a thread.
External Tweet loading...
If nothing shows, it may have been deleted
by @SheerHubris view original on Twitter
First of all: I'm not talking about that kind of educational program — I'm all for Jews teaching Christians about Judaism, and I'm all for Jews and Christians learning from one another in general. I think that's really important.
What I'm objecting to is: Some Christians do programs by-and-for Christians that they refer to as Seders, which take place in or adjacent to Holy Week and involve something along the lines of reenacting the Last Supper.