(THREAD--21 tweets) So this went well. Here’s what really happened at the G-7 summit in Charlevoix, Quebec. #g-7
1/ Trump magnanimously agrees to attend the G-7 summit--although he hates and despises the “rule-based international order” on which is based and all his instincts tell him to destroy it.
2/ Trump behaves like a man-baby at the conference, and alienates all the other G-7 members, without exception.
3/ At his presser on leaving the conference, Trump gaslights in the most shamefaced manner imaginable, claiming that on a scale of 0 to 10, his relationship with the other members at the summit had hit a 10.
4/ Trump also maligned all previous US presidents (going back at least through the entire post-World War II period) and was insufferably aggressive and offensive in his remarks about the negotiations that had taken place at Charlevoix.
5/ At the summit, Trump had also issued a throw away line about getting rid of all tariffs, all subsidies etc., and he repeated this proposal at his press conference.
5/ No one at the summit knew what to make of this, and in any case it would take years to negotiate, and would also require a POTUS who is not a man-baby for it to have any chance of success.
6/ What WAS clearly left on the table was Trump’s pledge (at least until the brave new world of zero tariffs materializes) that the US would unilaterally raise tariffs against all other G-7 members, including Canada.
7/ After Trump leaves, Trudeau gives a dignified and low-keyed presser which does not in any way refer to Trump personally, but says that Canada will respond with retaliatory tariffs against the US b/c Canada will not be pushed around.
8/ When he hears about this on Air Force One, Trump goes ballistic and insults Trudeau on Twitter.
9/ That Trump misrepresented how things went down with the other members is crystal clear from the statements issued today by Angela Merkel and Emmanuel Macron, who backed Trudeau against Trump.
10/ Trump’s economic advisers at the summit then weighed in. The reaction of Kudlow tinyurl.com/ybsbj6fp
11/ and Navarro are interesting. tinyurl.com/y9broxdv
12/ Kudlow accused Trudeau of backstabbing Trump, and further of trying to sabotage Trump’s negotiations with Kim Jong-Un in Singapore.
13/ Kudlow is exercised because Trudeau was not sufficiently appreciative that Trump had (initially) agreed to sign a joint statement at all.
14/ (He must have worked very hard to get Trump to sign it, although it amounted to nothing more than a restatement of a decades-old understanding with the US’s closest allies.)
15/ Kudlow’s reaction is only understandable on the assumption that he expected Trudeau to completely ignore what DID definitely go down at Toronto (i.e., unilaterally tearing up the G-7 trade deals and raising tariffs)
16/ and pay attention ONLY to Trump’s throw away line about free trade. (Kudlow is a free trader.) No reason in the world why Trudeau should have done that.
17/ Navarro is an ardent protectionist (anti-free trader) and also went ballistic, but for entirely different reasons, saying that Trudeau deserved a “special place in hell,”
18/ and made it clear that he was fiercely opposed to Trump’s signing that “socialist” joint statement at all--you know, the one that restated the economic trade principals that has made the US and its allies strong for decades.
19/ Observing all this, Fox News hosts praise Trump’s squalid and disastrous performance at the summit, claiming that it shows that Trump is “tough” and can’t be pushed around.
20/ The Trump administration arguably hit a new low at Charlevoix (which is saying something).

On to Singapore, for which (according to Kudlow), the G-7 conference was only a minor prelude and annoying diversion.

God help us.
Correction: Quebec.
Correction: "principles"

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh

Keep Current with Thomas Wood 🇺🇸 🌊 🇺🇦

Thomas Wood 🇺🇸 🌊 🇺🇦 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!


Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @twoodiac

Oct 9, 2018
One key to getting to the bottom of this is the private-wealth office of Deutsche Bank. @NatashaBertrand

I posted this to Twitter a long time ago. It’s from Yuri Felshtinsky and Vladimir Pribylovsky, The Corporation: Russia and the KGB in the Age of President Putin. Encounter Books. 2008, pp. 40-41 (not available online):
Read 4 tweets
Oct 6, 2018
Let’s try to clear up some confusion here.

We need to be clear about terms like “investigation,” “inquiry,” and “background check.”

Let’s begin with a relatively unloaded term: “inquiry.” 1/16
Here’s the question: Should the INQUIRY re #Kavanaugh have been conducted as a standard FBI BACKGROUND CHECK or as an FBI INVESTIGATION? 2/16
An FBI background check is not the same thing as an FBI investigation (though the former might very well lead to the latter). 3/16
Read 16 tweets
Oct 5, 2018
(THREAD) Collins votes YES, so Kavanaugh’s confirmed.

This is the finale of the confirmation VOTE, but it is NOT the end of the #Kavanaugh ISSUE. 1/14
The FBI “investigation” was a sham, and that makes Collins’ special pleading for her YES vote a sham. It was a sickening performance. 2/14
The fatal weakness of her defense of her vote is that there was no meaningful investigation. Merely seeking corroboration in the form of direct, eyewitness testimony from the participants of the 1 Jul 1982 meeting does not constitute a meaningful investigation. 3/14
Read 14 tweets
Oct 4, 2018
A subjective impression, admittedly, but in the pics and videos I have seen, Senate Rs look grim and worried--even, on occasion, angry.

D claim that this was a cover-up (20+ witnesses not called) is getting traction. No adequate push back from Rs yet.
McConnell saying on the floor that the Senate must vote to confirm b/c “in this country you’re not guilty until proven innocent” has this whole matter so wrong (it’s a job interview, Mitch, not a trial) that he must be feeling a little desperate.
Read 4 tweets
Oct 2, 2018
(THREAD) The predicted early conclusion of the FBI background check on #Kavanaugh that has been reported by Politico and the WSJ is surprising and cause for anxiety and concern, but let’s look try hard to look on the (possibly) bright side. 1/8
We must keep in mind that this investigation is essentially a background check on #Kavanaugh, in light of newly surfaced allegations of belligerent drunkenness and sexual violence alleged against him by Ford and others. 2/8
So this investigation is more about Kavanaugh and his nomination than it is about Ford or any other accusers, and while the FBI does not reach conclusions, it does uncovers facts, and presents those facts to others so they can better reach their own conclusions. 3/8
Read 8 tweets
Oct 1, 2018

1/ Dr Blasey: The party where the assault occurred was attended by Smyth (P.J.), Judge, Kavanaugh, another boy she can’t recall…
2/ Remember: Kavanaugh’s calendar (July 1) has Chris Garrett, her boyfriend at the time (she was at least dating him) at that party.
Read 15 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!


0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy


3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!