🚨#60SecondCTA!
Please RT & fill out the form in the thread below⤵
This #Pride month, 45 admin wants to roll back protections for some of the most vulnerable in the #LGBTQ community: foster youth, & foster/adoptive parents. You can help—it'll only take a minute. Continued⤵
Studies show that roughly 19% of foster youth identify as #LGBTQ. They experience worse safety, well-being & outcomes than non-LGBTQ youth. For states to improve these outcomes & identify best practices, data collection national data collection level is vitally important.
It is an unfortunate fact about our society, that parents sometimes reject their children for being #LGBTQ. LGBTQ children are disproportionately in foster care (1/5 foster youth) and homeless (2/5 homeless youth). huffingtonpost.com/entry/why-do-p…
To protect rights of #LGBTQ youth & deliver needed services, the Department of Health & Human Services (HHS) asks if children left home because of “family conflict related to child's sexual orientation, gender identity, or gender expression”—45’s HHS wants to take this Q away.
Additionally, there is a critical shortage of adoptive and foster parents in the US. Same-sex couples foster at six times the rate of their opposite-sex counterparts, and can provide loving, supportive homes for America’s 400,000+ foster youth. aclu.org/fact-sheet/ove…
The Department of Health & Human Services currently asks (voluntary) sexual orientation questions for foster youth, as well as foster and adoptive parents/guardians, to help collect data on where #LGBTQ rights might be violated—45’s HHS wants to end this as well.
Good news—you can help stop it! 45's HHS must accept public comment on their proposal to remove Qs protecting the rights of #LGBTQ foster children & parents. I've been on Twitter long enough to know there's a lot we have to say on protecting rights—need it on the official record.
The more comments that we file, the easier it will be to prove to HHS & in any potential court case that the public broadly opposes this proposed change that removes protections for #LGBTQ foster children and parents.
...But we need a lot more comments, and fast.
At the time of drafting this thread, there are only 45 public comments filed. In a previous #60SecondCTA public comment thread I posted, together #TheResistance filed 554 comments. Let’s see if we can break that record to protect the rights of #LGBTQ foster children & parents.
Follow this link: regulations.gov/docket?D=ACF-2…
Click “comment now”
Tell 45's HHS how you feel about them taking away questions that protect the rights of #LGBTQ foster children & parents. Or you can copy and paste a model comment from the next tweet—be sure to add your perspective.
I urge HHS to keep asking if children were removed from their home due to family conflict related to child's sexual orientation, gender identity, or gender expression. I also urge HHS to retain voluntary sexual orientation questions for foster youth & foster or adoptive parents.
The deadline to oppose HHS’s removing questions protecting the rights of #LGBTQ foster children & parents is Wed 6/13, at 11:59pm EST. Let’s share this message far & wide, and show them the mistake of having this public comment open during #Pride month.
External Tweet loading...
If nothing shows, it may have been deleted
by @AdamaEsq view original on Twitter
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/
Lie: Kavanaugh said “When this allegation first arose, I welcomed any kind of investigation."
Fact: “Kavanaugh did not publicly welcome an investigation in two public statements denying the allegations and an in-depth interview with Fox News." nbcnews.com/card/fact-chec…
2/ Lie: Kavanaugh said he “never attended a gathering like the one Dr. Ford describes in her allegation.”
Fact: Kavanaugh admitted that his calendars “show a few weekday gatherings at friends’ houses after a workout or just to meet up and have some beers. washingtonpost.com/politics/2018/…
I’m an attorney & have followed the Kavanaugh nomination closely. I want to discuss why I think it's important to use the word perjury to discuss some of #Kavanaugh's dishonesty. Continued ⤵ salon.com/2018/09/14/bre…
A major problem with news coverage of Kavanaugh's deception is that the news relies on experts for its stories & that many of the legal experts including #NeverTrump conservatives & anti-trump progressives know #Kavanaugh to be a thoughtful lawyer. (Cartoon via @tomtomorrow)
A good example of this came from 1 of my favorite podcasts, @NSLpodcast. Hosts are 2 attorneys—1conservative/1progressive—both critical of Trump. Both set aside evidence of #Kavanaugh's dishonesty bc they believe him to be honest. They know him personally
Thought someone should do a thread of all controversies during that time that they might be hiding. Continued⤵ slate.com/news-and-polit…
This thread ended up being longer than I anticipated, turns out the George W. Bush admin had more than a few controversies—I expect I missed a few things.
If you notice something big I missed, comment with reputable news article, and I’ll quote tweet your comment onto the thread
The 2000 FL Vote recount (Florida law required recount for a razor close election, Bush legal team argued to end it, eventually successfully before the #SCOTUS … he was on the Bush legal team). miamiherald.com/news/nation-wo…
At the direction of the White House, Secretary of Commerce Wilbur Ross, in coordination with AG Jeff Sessions’ anti-immigrant DOJ, announced that he directed the Census Bureau to add a citizenship question to the 2020 Census. nytimes.com/2018/07/24/us/…
45's attempt is blatantly political & would lead to an undercount that would lead to the taking of seats in the House of Representatives, electoral college votes, & federal funds from from big states with immigrants & give them to rural—mostly red—states. nytimes.com/2018/07/31/ups…
Since the #KennedyRetirement I've seen pessimism that Roe v Wade & the ACA are already lost. But we in #TheResistance aren't pundits.
WE. ARE. ACTIVISTS.
WE won on the ACA repeal.
Senate margin➡NARROWER.
There's a path to victory—just need to march there.
Details in thread⤵
ICYMI, in a debate in 2016, then candidate 45 vowed that he would "put[] pro-life justices on the court," and that if he could place multiple justices on SCOTS, that Roe v Wade would be overturned "automatically." npr.org/2018/06/28/624…
45 & SCOTUS may think that a woman’s right to choose is a close partisan decision, 5/4 with Kennedy as the deciding vote. But It’s not even close; only 18% of Americans believe abortion should be illegal in all circumstances—has stayed steady since Roe. news.gallup.com/poll/1576/abor…
External Tweet loading...
If nothing shows, it may have been deleted
by @jacobsoboroff view original on Twitter
If you've ever wondered what you would do if you lived in Nazi Germany, NOW is the time to stand for justice.
đź“žYour MoC now. Demand oversight.
Then join a family separation protest near you, later today: familiesbelong.org
I don't make the comparison to Nazi Germany lightly. I'm a #CivilRights lawyer, I have a Master's in IR w a focus on history, I attended FSU Holocaust institute.
Starts w dehumanizing words: "immigrants are animals" or immigrant children "aren't innocent" gq.com/story/trump-on…
Then there's deification and memorialization of the man saying those dehumanizing words. He can do no wrong, cannot be questioned.
External Tweet loading...
If nothing shows, it may have been deleted
by @jacobsoboroff view original on Twitter