Now over to Canadian parliament from British parliament to see how the AggregateIQ investigations are going after brexitbros ditch the end for a lunch appointment. And…we have a no-show.
External Tweet loading...
If nothing shows, it may have been deleted
by @bryson_m view original on Twitter
Appreciate this #ETHI committee’s probing on specific uses of Facebook Custom Audiences. AIQ claims it does no voter suppression and claims “disengagement targets” are to exclude them for list matching. Claims they don’t do psychographics, just use SCL’s scores from their data.
AIQ’s Silvester asked about his ethical position on using psychological profiling for politics. Dodges that it was “new” but didn’t take a clear moral stand. Tech engineers thinking they are somehow amoral is at the heart of this crisis.
Dispute continues over whether AIQ was “franchise” of SCL and Wylie’s statements under oath. Asked if he has been “entirely cooperative” as he claimed, including with ICO, yet they asserted they are not subject to their jurisdiction and refused to answer Denham’s questions.
AIQ asked about Wylie’s “canary in the coalmine” statement on how digital exposes vulnerabilities in electoral processes. Silvester punts to Facebook and updating laws. Asked about data traversing across territorialities and if GDPR requires changing his biz practices.
AIQ asked if they new they might have been dealing “stolen goods” and he deflects that it’s responsibility if his clients to be lawful. Again, political adtech’s failure to adopt KYC Know Your Customer protocols like banking is ripe for abuse.
Silvester asked about Massingham (the no show) “grab the money” from Grimes of BeLeave to run a huge ad spend of £300K in a single day. Questions on illegal coordination and allegations of money laundering for Vote Leave thru AIQ.
Silvester getting hammered about whether he serves as a means to help evade data privacy jurisdictions. I mean if you’re going to work across democracies, you’re gonna have to field that concern.
AIQ asked how they determine the nuances between negative attack ads and misinformation/disinfo. Silvester dodges that it’s his client’s responsibility.
Silvester asked if he believes misappropriated data was used to create psychographic scores fed into RIPON. In hindsight, yes it seems likely.
In retrospect knowing what we know now, does he think he should’ve done more due diligence. Would he reconsider working with SCL given fallout? “Wouldn’t wish it on his enemies.” LOL
Asked if he knows caller ID spoofing is illegal in the US and data harvesting is illegal in the UK. Does he realize he’s aided and abetting a crime? “OK.” He admitted he did spoofing and harvesting. Reminded that he wrote to ICO that they not subject to her jurisdiction.
Silvester then equivocates about they don’t do harvesting…just build the tools. Keeps getting hammered about why he told Information Commissioner that her office has no jurisdiction.
Silvester urged to use his parliament privilege to come clean about illegal coordination. Jeff demurs and denies.
Asked about Breitbart/Orion tool for SCL for a pitch to Breitbart. Claims they didn’t move forward with the project. A client in US has two clients in US and one in Ukraine. (I think I may know they’re referring to.)
Stands to reason, what we know now…
External Tweet loading...
If nothing shows, it may have been deleted
by @vickerysec view original on Twitter
In closing, chair impresses upon the failure of Massingham to attend today which moves committee closer to assessing holding him contempt and inadequate responses. Chair traces purloined data thru RIPON from Cruz to Bolton to Trump. /FIN
Stunning conclusion of #EHTI committee's hearing w/AIQ's chief Jeff Silvester. Facebook let SCL purloin data aided & abetted by AIQ's tools against UK DPA for Cruz, Bolton, Trump, (presumably back into Facebook w/Custom Audiences.) Bannon/Mercer are perps.
External Tweet loading...
If nothing shows, it may have been deleted
by @VickerySec view original on Twitter
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The election of 2016 was a PSYOP. No, really. nyti.ms/2E6xgmD
Cambridge Analytica and Psy Group had a memorandum of understanding, reported in May. wsj.com/articles/israe…
Fact that Cruz’s Cambridge Analytica appears to have sought to team up with Psy Group, which sought to run a social media PSYOP against Cruz is…awkward.
So many simultaneous Kavanaugh scandals, overloaded the system.
- sexual (how can he deny blackouts?)
- financial (how did he pay off debt?)
- hacking (how can he deny knowing about pilfered docs)
- surveillance (how can he deny his role?)
- perjury (how can he lie about it all?)
- financial scandal: the unexplained mystery of the impossible Kavanaugh family finances is nicely documented and explained here (although I do bristle at how it downplays the sexual scandal; again see above on scandal overload) medium.com/@gregolear/sup…
- hacking and surveillance scandal: this piece by @nycsouthpaw is a twofor in that you get deep coverage on both the surveillance FOIA revelation and the senate hacking scandal context yahoo.com/news/lawsuits-…
Kavanaugh’s toxicity poisons an already reeling Facebook, enraging employees and flummoxing executives. nyti.ms/2CpoSwI
Facebook’s behavioral microtargeting political ad business unit is a moneymaker. They all shouldn’t be surprised when the chickens they hatched come home to roost.
Joel Kaplan was sitting behind Zuckerberg for his Congressional hearings. That too was a rather perjurious affair. (Zuck remains in contempt of UK parliament committee for failing to appear.)
It’s a criminal act in the UK to defy the Information Commissioner’s specific order to comply with data protection law. This order is from May 2018 and now we can confirm it will go to trial in the UK next year. wired.com/story/uk-regul…
A “defunct” company sure seems willing to spend its allegedly sparse resources going to trial against the data cops for refusing to hand over all the personal data it collected about me. What are they hiding? Will their creditors tolerate this?
If you’re up for SCOTUS then yeah all your shit is gonna get dredged up. Welcome to the future.
Kavanaugh stands to be the most anti-privacy justice on the bench. His view of the 4th is as warped as his view of the 1st. He’s most likely to rule in favor of a Citizens United-type decision for Silicon Valley, ruling that business surveillance is protected commercial speech.
It’s hard to imagine a future where Kavanaugh is confirmed and we don’t find ourselves, a decade later, in some fucked up dystopia.
I suspect one reason this mega-breach isn’t causing a bigger reaction is that it has no name. Usually hacks and breaches are quickly dubbed something catchy which catapults them thru the coverage and watercooler debates.
Cleverest I can come up is #ChuckE in reference to Chuck E Cheese’s where you get tokens for your birthday parties, in reference to how access tokens were hacked thru exploits in birthday video upload tool. But that’s quite a US-centric reference.