0/ Exciting insights from chats with VCs at Blockchain Economic Forum #BEF2018:
1/ VCs want in on blockchain, but utility tokens/ cryptocurrencies offer no guarantee of rights. Blockchain startups raising traditional equity provide exposure to the growth of blockchain in a much more attractive format to VCs.
2) Very, very hard for "traditional" VC to have a wholesome crypto strategy unless it has a dedicated arm for crypto with full-time analysts. (VC) fund of (crypto) funds alternative is becoming more attractive.
3/ Some believe generalist funds will be rendered obsolete as ICOs with formalized equity rights emerge. Only VCs that provide specific know-how (e.g. subject matter expertise, cross-border connections) can survive.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Plenty of exciting stuff in crypto in Asia goes overlooked in the US.
Here are some updates this week from #Asia in #crypto amidst a bear market:
From the Philippines 🇵🇭:
SEC is looking to define all tokens as securities by default. Earlier, it also deemed crypto cloud mining contracts as securities. This increases false positives (non-securities deemed as securities).
A bike-sharing startup has sold its majority stake in exchange for crypto. It will use its tokens to reward renters and promote bike usage. Convincing HK users to use bikes AND set up crypto wallets...hmm 🤔
Using a different browser than your main one for eth transactions through an in-browser wallet (or using another browser profile) is a viable workaround. /2
"Providing exposure" alone is not a defensible strategy for funds.
Fund managers have to take care of events with no public market analogues for traditional investors (e.g. custodianship, airdrops, staking, hard forks) too.
Investors need to bet on assets with local maxima of value and evaluate trade offs between censorship resistance, expressivity, throughput, latency, scalability, governance, privacy etc.
Privacy is a not a good selling point for cryptocurrencies (compared to speed, low fees, security, decentralization etc), because:
1) Most people seem to value convenience over privacy
2) Public tolerance for forfeiting some privacy is high
/0
Payment solutions are sticky.
As long as existing alternatives provide easier user experience (e.g. Venmo, Paypal), educating the public about the importance of fungibility and privacy in crypto won't be enough to promote mass adoption of privacy coins
/1
Privacy is not binary.
Most people understand the value of day-to-day financial privacy from unknown parties (creepy stalkers), but are ok with a recognized company knowing their transaction histories (e.g. private transactions on Venmo). For most, Monero is an overkill.
/2