EFF Profile picture
Jun 18, 2018 24 tweets 15 min read
Everyone needs to know just how wildly dangerous the European Union’s vote this week could be for the global Internet, and the undecided members of the European Parliament must consider the massive worldwide ramifications of their votes. (1/24)
First, some EU lawmakers want to create a #LinkTax (#Article11)—a ham-fisted proposal that would punish those who use the Internet as an open platform for sharing. /2 publicknowledge.org/news-blog/blog…
Second, they also want to force sites to filter nearly all of their users' submissions against a database of copyrighted works. #Article13 would create a #CensorshipMachine so big it threatens to wreck the Internet itself. /3 motherboard.vice.com/en_us/article/…
The vote is close. Undecided members of the European Parliament’s JURI committee are deciding now on #Article11 and #Article13: Will they vote on Wednesday to break the Net? Or reject both articles, and stand up for free expression, creativity, and privacy? /4
Open science advocates and major organisations from the library, research, education, and digital rights community have warned that Article 11 “poses a significant threat to an informed and literate society.” /5 creativecommons.org/2017/09/07/eur…
@mady_delvaux, will you vote to protect open access and open science, and reject #Article11’s ancillary right? /6
The EU Commission insists #Article11 isn’t a #LinkTax. But what else would you call it when a publisher controls even the use of small snippets of news text surrounding a hyperlink to the original article? /7
Small publishers have said that #Article11 will have a negative impact on authors and journalists, consumers and citizens, as well as small news publishers. /8
edima-eu.org/wp-content/upl…
@1PavelSvoboda, will you vote to protect the fundamental nature of the European (and global) Internet by voting against #Article11? Let everyone continue linking to and discussing the news online! /9
The practical effect of #Article11 would be to make it impossible for a news publisher to publish their stories for free use, for example by using a @creativecommons license—and to prevent the online reuse of news content. /10 eff.org/deeplinks/2018…
@Jbergeronmep, when a similar proposal was passed in Spain, it resulted in the closure of online news portals, and a reduction in traffic to news publishers. Will you vote to stop a new link tax that’s both unnecessary and harmful? /11 nera.com/publications/a…
If it’s even possible, #Article13 would have an even greater impact on the global Internet. Over 70 Internet and computing luminaries have told the EU: "For the sake of the Internet’s future, we urge you to vote for the deletion of this proposal." /12 gizmodo.com/the-founding-f…
@Emil_Radev last week we sent you a letter containing that important message from these leaders of the Internet, warning about #Article13. Will you heed their advice and vote against #Article13? /13
The inventor of the World Wide Web, the co-founder of Wikipedia, and the founder of the Internet Archive agree: "Article 13 takes an unprecedented step towards the transformation of the Internet...into a tool for the automated surveillance and control of its users." /14
@MCBoutonnetFN, will you vote to protect the speech of French internet users from corporate surveillance and censorship, by voting against #Article13 ? /15
The UN's senior expert on free expression, @davidakaye, warns the EU that the copyright censorship provisions of #Article13 violate international law. /16 techdirt.com/articles/20180…
@rohde_jens, will you vote against a potential violation of international law—a censorship provision that endangers free expression, according to the UN’s expert? #Article13 /17
@EDRI agreed that upload filters like these endanger freedom of expression. @Franciszd, will you vote to protect freedom of expression? /18 edri.org/upload-filters…
#Article13 is fundamentally incompatible with projects that present & preserve records of noteworthy controversies—from Wikipedia to the Internet Archive—who agree that #Article13’s #CensorshipMachine would impair free knowledge on the Internet. /19 eff.org/deeplinks/2018…
@KaufmannSylvia, will you vote to protect knowledge and innovation, by voting against #Article13? /20 blog.wikimedia.org/2017/06/06/eur…
Reddit and other online platforms have come out against #Article13, warning that it will likely lead to “the effective shutdown of user-generated content platforms in Europe.” /21 reddit.com/r/announcement…
@SHKMEP, will you vote to protect the free and open Internet, and vote against #Article13 and #Article11? /22
Other Articles in this proposal help promote competition and innovation online. But #Article11 and #Article13 are poorly drafted, unworkable—and dangerous. The collateral damage they will impose on every realm of public life can't be overstated. /23
MEPs—as you consider proposals that could break the Internet for the entire globe—how do you plan to vote on #Article11 and #Article13? @SHKMEP @Jbergeronmep @MCBoutonnetFN @Emil_Radev @Franciszd @mady_delvaux @KaufmannSylvia @rohde_jens /24

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with EFF

EFF Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @EFF

Oct 3, 2018
A whopping 800,000 people registered to vote for National Voter Registration Day.

But Congress and state governments still have not taken the recommended measures to increase security in the midterm elections. <thread> eff.org/deeplinks/2018…
At this year’s @defcon, researchers evaluated a voting machine that’s used in 18 different states. They demonstrated how easy it is to gain admin access, which lets someone change settings—or even the ballot—in under two minutes. defcon.org/images/defcon-…
A Congressional working group concluded that election infrastructure is largely insecure across the country, with 42 states using machines susceptible to vote flipping, and at least ten states using machines that provide no paper record or receipt. documentcloud.org/documents/4379…
Read 8 tweets
Oct 2, 2018
When @mcsweeneys editors approached EFF earlier this year about collaborating on a surveillance & privacy-themed essay collection, we jumped at the opportunity.

The first all non-fiction issue of Timothy McSweeney’s Quarterly Concern debuts this November: eff.org/deeplinks/2018…
“The End of Trust” features writing by EFF’s team, including Executive Director Cindy Cohn, @maassive, Soraya Okuda, @doctorow, and board member @schneierblog, exploring issues related to surveillance, freedom of information, and encryption. eff.org/deeplinks/2018…
You’ll be able to read contributions from Pioneer Award winners @trevorpaglen and @culturejedi, as well as @biellacoleman, @snowden, @kmontenegro, @mykecole, @camfassett, @benwizner, @alvarombedoya, @dalitdiva, @rushkoff, and many more.
store.mcsweeneys.net/products/mcswe…
Read 5 tweets
Oct 1, 2018
A group of organizations, advocates, and academics—including @EFF—came together in February to create the Santa Clara Principles on Transparency and Accountability in Content Moderation. We're happy to announce that the Principles now have a permanent home:santaclaraprinciples.org
The Principles set a minimum standard for transparency and accountability for communications platforms, and should serve as a basis for more in-depth dialogue and activism going forward. santaclaraprinciples.org
The Principles ask that companies be transparent to the public and their users about content takedowns and account suspensions, and provide opportunity for timely, meaningful appeals to their users. santaclaraprinciples.org
Read 4 tweets
Sep 27, 2018
Anyone looking to make changes to how online platforms police speech should learn lessons from the failures of using copyright to do the same. Here are five major takeaways from the copyright wars: eff.org/deeplinks/2018…
1. Mistakes will be made. The law gives huge incentives to platforms to take things down after getting a complaint, leading people seeing their work disappear due to fraudulent takedown notices. Content moderation policies have and will make similar errors.eff.org/takedowns
2. Robots are not the answer. We've seen the mess that automated filters like YouTube's cause.

No law should mandate the use of this kind of technology. eff.org/deeplinks/2018…
Read 6 tweets
Sep 26, 2018
On Monday, a federal court dismissed our lawsuit against the Justice Department to block enforcement of #FOSTA. (1/5) eff.org/deeplinks/2018…
The case was filed on behalf of two human rights organizations, a digital library, an activist for sex workers, and a certified massage therapist. The court did not reach the merits of any of the constitutional issues, but instead found the plaintiffs did not have standing. (2/5)
We’re disappointed & believe the decision is wrong. For example, the court failed to apply the standing principles that are usually applied in 1st Amendment cases in which the plaintiffs’ speech is chilled. The plaintiffs are considering their options for their next steps. (3/5)
Read 5 tweets
Sep 25, 2018
In 2014, we launched Onlinecensorship.org (@censored) to collect reports from users who had experienced content takedowns on social media, in an effort to encourage companies to operate with greater transparency and accountability as they make decisions that regulate speech.
Today, we're relaunching the site with a fresh new look! We're still collecting reports from users, but going forward, @censored will be home to more resources for users, journalists reporting on content moderation, and companies.
Our journalist toolkit offers insight into a set of diverse issues and is a one-stop resource for information related to content moderation policies: onlinecensorship.org/content/a-reso…
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(