Derivatives for relatively illiquid cryptoassets are a bad idea.
2/ On accreditation:
It is “silly” but will likely stay as a way to tier investor protection.
3/ On decentralized exchanges:
As more AML/KYC and anti-front running laws get set in place, and as centralized exchanges increase rent, dex’s will start to catch volume.
Regulators will likely then target on-ramps.
4/ On tokenizing liquid assets:
If asset is liquid (e.g. stocks and bonds), tokenization will likely be unnecessary except for global tax arbitrage.
For Gold, silver - probably will happen due to capital markets interest.
5/ On tokenizing illiquid assets:
For illiquid assets, tokenization may bring unknown risks (e.g. as seen in the securitization of commercial loans and mortgage backed securities in 08)
If crypto stabilizes in public policy (projected timeline 2-3 years) and the asset class scales significantly, hedge funds and investment banks will come in en masse, but might be slower due to reputational and compliance risks.
7/ On securities law:
Most ICOs are probably security offerings but can become decentralized over time.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Plenty of exciting stuff in crypto in Asia goes overlooked in the US.
Here are some updates this week from #Asia in #crypto amidst a bear market:
From the Philippines 🇵🇭:
SEC is looking to define all tokens as securities by default. Earlier, it also deemed crypto cloud mining contracts as securities. This increases false positives (non-securities deemed as securities).
A bike-sharing startup has sold its majority stake in exchange for crypto. It will use its tokens to reward renters and promote bike usage. Convincing HK users to use bikes AND set up crypto wallets...hmm 🤔
Using a different browser than your main one for eth transactions through an in-browser wallet (or using another browser profile) is a viable workaround. /2
"Providing exposure" alone is not a defensible strategy for funds.
Fund managers have to take care of events with no public market analogues for traditional investors (e.g. custodianship, airdrops, staking, hard forks) too.
Investors need to bet on assets with local maxima of value and evaluate trade offs between censorship resistance, expressivity, throughput, latency, scalability, governance, privacy etc.
Privacy is a not a good selling point for cryptocurrencies (compared to speed, low fees, security, decentralization etc), because:
1) Most people seem to value convenience over privacy
2) Public tolerance for forfeiting some privacy is high
/0
Payment solutions are sticky.
As long as existing alternatives provide easier user experience (e.g. Venmo, Paypal), educating the public about the importance of fungibility and privacy in crypto won't be enough to promote mass adoption of privacy coins
/1
Privacy is not binary.
Most people understand the value of day-to-day financial privacy from unknown parties (creepy stalkers), but are ok with a recognized company knowing their transaction histories (e.g. private transactions on Venmo). For most, Monero is an overkill.
/2