Canadian Parliament committee investigating Cambridge Analytica/SCL/AggregateIQ releases first report. See I told you. wired.com/story/david-ca…
External Tweet loading...
If nothing shows, it may have been deleted
by @lryck view original on Twitter
AggregateIQ head Zach Massingham’s decision to blow off his second parliamentary appearance in Ottawa may have consequences. The pattern of evasion is consistent with the SCL network of operators, that’s for sure.
External Tweet loading...
If nothing shows, it may have been deleted
by @lryck view original on Twitter
Still so much to uncover in the AggregateIQ story. You can see why these guys aren’t fully cooperating with the authorities.
External Tweet loading...
If nothing shows, it may have been deleted
by @vickerysec view original on Twitter
Here is the full report from House of Commons, Canada
ADDRESSING DIGITAL PRIVACY VULNERABILITIES AND POTENTIAL THREATS TO CANADA’S DEMOCRATIC ELECTORAL PROCESS
Report of the Standing Committee on Access to Information,
Privacy and Ethics #ETHI#cdnpoliourcommons.ca/content/Commit…
Remember: Canada's privacy watchdog warned Facebook about third-party developers and personality quizzes leaking data all over the place in 2009. 2009. Yes. 2009. priv.gc.ca/en/opc-news/ne…
See. The internationalization of the Republican's data machine is unprecedented and contending with cross-jurisdictional investigations and semi-cooperative monopoly platforms is a new threat to electoral integrity. Also, they call it a "breach" per their privacy regime.
Here's the part where #ETHI declares its dissatisfaction with Silvester and Massingham of AIQ's responses and do not consider that they have fully cooperated with @ICOnews and their investigation into possible data crimes. Heavy stuff folks.
Here's @DamianCollins on the necessity of a muscular data protection regulator equipped with the tools to seize rogue actor equipment so that citizens can express their data rights. This applies to US citizens. It's just that most don't even realize it. It's why I keep fighting.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The election of 2016 was a PSYOP. No, really. nyti.ms/2E6xgmD
Cambridge Analytica and Psy Group had a memorandum of understanding, reported in May. wsj.com/articles/israe…
Fact that Cruz’s Cambridge Analytica appears to have sought to team up with Psy Group, which sought to run a social media PSYOP against Cruz is…awkward.
So many simultaneous Kavanaugh scandals, overloaded the system.
- sexual (how can he deny blackouts?)
- financial (how did he pay off debt?)
- hacking (how can he deny knowing about pilfered docs)
- surveillance (how can he deny his role?)
- perjury (how can he lie about it all?)
- financial scandal: the unexplained mystery of the impossible Kavanaugh family finances is nicely documented and explained here (although I do bristle at how it downplays the sexual scandal; again see above on scandal overload) medium.com/@gregolear/sup…
- hacking and surveillance scandal: this piece by @nycsouthpaw is a twofor in that you get deep coverage on both the surveillance FOIA revelation and the senate hacking scandal context yahoo.com/news/lawsuits-…
Kavanaugh’s toxicity poisons an already reeling Facebook, enraging employees and flummoxing executives. nyti.ms/2CpoSwI
Facebook’s behavioral microtargeting political ad business unit is a moneymaker. They all shouldn’t be surprised when the chickens they hatched come home to roost.
Joel Kaplan was sitting behind Zuckerberg for his Congressional hearings. That too was a rather perjurious affair. (Zuck remains in contempt of UK parliament committee for failing to appear.)
It’s a criminal act in the UK to defy the Information Commissioner’s specific order to comply with data protection law. This order is from May 2018 and now we can confirm it will go to trial in the UK next year. wired.com/story/uk-regul…
A “defunct” company sure seems willing to spend its allegedly sparse resources going to trial against the data cops for refusing to hand over all the personal data it collected about me. What are they hiding? Will their creditors tolerate this?
If you’re up for SCOTUS then yeah all your shit is gonna get dredged up. Welcome to the future.
Kavanaugh stands to be the most anti-privacy justice on the bench. His view of the 4th is as warped as his view of the 1st. He’s most likely to rule in favor of a Citizens United-type decision for Silicon Valley, ruling that business surveillance is protected commercial speech.
It’s hard to imagine a future where Kavanaugh is confirmed and we don’t find ourselves, a decade later, in some fucked up dystopia.
I suspect one reason this mega-breach isn’t causing a bigger reaction is that it has no name. Usually hacks and breaches are quickly dubbed something catchy which catapults them thru the coverage and watercooler debates.
Cleverest I can come up is #ChuckE in reference to Chuck E Cheese’s where you get tokens for your birthday parties, in reference to how access tokens were hacked thru exploits in birthday video upload tool. But that’s quite a US-centric reference.