Share this page!

Enter URL or ID to Unroll

You can paste full URL like: https://x.com/threadreaderapp/status/1644127596119195649
or just the ID like: 1644127596119195649

How to get URL link on X (Twitter) App

  1. On the Twitter thread, click on or icon on the bottom
  2. Click again on or Share Via icon
  3. Click on Copy Link to Tweet
  4. Paste it above and click "Unroll Thread"!
  5. More info at Twitter Help
Brian Cates - Political Columnist & Pundit Profile picture
@drawandstrike
Jun 19, 2018 • 8 tweets • 2 min read • Read on X
So that's FOUR people unceremoniously stripped off of Mueller's team. Peter Strzok, Lisa Page, Sally Moyer, and one other person as yet unidentified.

Remember when I told you people were INVESTIGATING THE INVESTIGATORS the entire time Mueller was forming his team? 🤔
Mueller has not only found nothing he can use to hurt Trump with, he's had 4 people pulled off his team in the last year. And we now have a report that altered 302 interview forms are being investigated by the OIG.

#ClearFlynnNow
PEOPLE YOUR LOINS GIRD THEM. NOW.

Also people are misreading this statement from Strzok's lawyer. Strzok was escorted from the FBI building as part of the ongoing examination process that he is FULLY COOPERATING WITH.

People saying he's not cooperating/stopped cooperating = wrong.
Strzok and his lawyer are at least PRETENDING he's fighting to keep his job as an FBI agent. "I'm cooperating, whaddya mean I can't be an FBI agent any more?!"

If he was dumb enough to think he'd remain in the FBI when this was over, he knows better now.
When an FBI agent is stripped of credentials and terminated, for violating procedures as well as laws, there is a protocol that is followed. Right up until he had to follow it, maybe Strzok was fantasizing he'd somehow avoid this.
Remember the text messages with Page show this guy has the mental level of a teenager.

Maybe like McCabe, up until the VERY END he figured they'd never go through with actually FIRING him.

Could be the moment Stzrok realized he'd be fired he told his lawyer 'start talking'.
And of course there's the possibility that all the way through this Strzok has NEVER cooperated and I've been wrong, they've been having to isolate him and treat him as a hostile witness the entire time.

And when they were done with him started the OPR firing process.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
　

Keep Current with Brian Cates - Political Columnist & Pundit

Brian Cates - Political Columnist & Pundit Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @drawandstrike

Brian Cates - Political Columnist & Pundit Profile picture
Sep 18, 2020
You know how a jet fighter launches chaff to throw the enemy off the target?

I'm halfway convinced it was the **TRUMP TEAM ITSELF** in the White House sending out people to be anonymous sources spreading these "OMG Kushner is an IDIOT!" stories in the Fake News Media.
Trump is a master of information warfare.

If anybody started putting 2 and 2 together and snooping around what Kushner was up to, I can totally see the White House sending people out to anonymously seed the media with stories like...this:

spectator.us/jared-kushner-…
All the anonymous sources were in agreement: this Kushner guy is just benefiting from having married Trump's daughter, he's in way WAY over his head, has got no clue what he's doing.

cnn.com/2019/06/04/opi…
Read 34 tweets
Brian Cates - Political Columnist & Pundit Profile picture
Sep 17, 2020
Hi @seanmdav.

For a guy who calls out the Fake News Media an awful lot, you sure seem to trust what they tell you when it suits you.

Somebody who **actually** listened to Wray's testimony **instead of** getting their "Cliff Notes" from the Fake News Media:

My friend @Shem_Infinite:

There is no excuse for this. You're getting your "hot take" on what Wray actually testified from a Huffpost Reporter?

Do better.

Read 4 tweets
Brian Cates - Political Columnist & Pundit Profile picture
Sep 17, 2020
We already saw this movie.

Didn't we already see this movie?

I think we all already saw this movie.

The only thing **different** about how Comey won't answer the questions put to him by these Congressional commitees [other than the standard "I don't recall"] is he won't be saying:

"I can't comment on that because it's currently part of an ongoing federal investigation."
Instead Comey will be saying THIS:

"On the advice of my legal counsel, I invoke my Fifth amendment rights."

or

"My counsel has advised me not to discuss this, and so I won't."
Read 5 tweets
Brian Cates - Political Columnist & Pundit Profile picture
Sep 17, 2020
To people endlessly asking me if President Trump is aware of and taking steps to combat this whole "Color Revolution" playbook:

Yes, he is aware of it.

Yes, he is taking steps to deal with it.

No, he's not going to tell you what they are.
The biggest assumption people make is because Trump hasn't **publicly rolled out** his strategy for dealing with this threat that is all over the media & we're all talking about it is because....he's blind to it.

Utter nonsense.

Trump does not reveal things until HE'S READY TO DO THAT.

And he will only do that when there's nothing the enemy can do to sabotage his efforts.

Look at what just happened YESTERDAY.

Remember YESTERDAY?
Read 13 tweets
Brian Cates - Political Columnist & Pundit Profile picture
Sep 16, 2020
Yeah. Durham's wrapped.

That's why they are issuing the subpoenas now.

foxnews.com/politics/senat…
I've had to endlessly explain this for going on 2 years now:

While the investigation is ongoing, you wouldn't learn anything from subpoenaing these goons because they'd do what COMEY & STRZOK & Mueller & everybody else did when they testified before Congress.

Right?
How many times did you want to hear over and over

"I'm sorry I cannot answer that question because the matter is currently under investigation by the Dept. of Justice" or the dozen of variations to that?

Because THAT'S what you would have heard before now.

You know I'm right.
Read 13 tweets
Brian Cates - Political Columnist & Pundit Profile picture
Sep 16, 2020
A whole lot of people get SpyGate stuff wrong because they don't know the timeline of the actual events.

So here's a handy reference you can use:

theepochtimes.com/mkt_app/infogr…
Given to what's coming, I want to draw your attention to THESE two events that occurred in early March, 2016. Image
THIS got memory-holed. But pay attention. There will be a quiz later. Image
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

Send Email!

:(