1/ I don’t think there is any type of scam or fraud behind @bitfinex, #Tether, and $USDT reserves. Today’s report gave the market the most important information they needed (reserves are there), yet doubters want more. Here is why I don’t think there is fraud with #Tether:
2/ The hit on Bitfinex is that they are printing $USDT with no backing. This would mean that Bitfinex is knowingly committing fraud and market manipulation for in the crypto space, all while the biggest spotlight is on them. This seems extremely unlikely to me for many reasons.
3/ First let’s take a look at Occum’s Razor: “a problem-solving principle that, when presented with competing hypothetical answers to a problem, one should select the answer that makes the fewest assumptions.” Let’s take facts and not assumptions.
4/ Bitfinex is a highly profitable company (and was well before Tether existed). Bloomberg estimates that Bitfinex is making around $500mn a year in exchange fees alone. Why commit a complex, unnecessary fraud when you’re company is already making insane amounts of money?
5/ Bitfinex was founded in 2012 when Bitcoin prices were $100. We can assume the founders held and do hold very large amount of Bitcoin. Again, if you are already holding personal extreme wealth, why commit a complex, unnecessary fraud?
6/ Crypto trading volume, despite price being on a 60-90% dip across the board, is still near an all time high. While ideally price would be on the rise, exchanges are rather indifferent to the daily up and down swings in prices, they still make money in both directions.
7/ Bitfinex employees nearly 100 employees according to LinkedIn. In the proposed #USDT scam, Bitfinex would have to be masking the scam to employees. Any feud or unhappy employee would expose it. If not, we’re assuming nearly all employees are in on it…again, very unlikely.
8/ The most likely answer to the criticism of no full audit is that Bitfinex wants to hide their bank connections. They fear governments will try to shut them down. If the banks are exposed, that will happen. This is the risk in holding $USDT, not that there are false reserves.
9/ Smaller, unnknown banks are taking in these large deposits because they can earn a lot off them. At the same time, $USDT is providing a nice fiat onramp for some crypto customers.
10/ The burden of proof when it comes to claiming scam is on the people claiming scam. There has been no direct evidence to date that reserves don’t exist and Occum’s Razor would lead us the fact that the reserves are fine and there isn’t some grand scheme taking place.
Damn, if only I knew how to spell Occam.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/ After last weeks Ethereum Core Dev Call on issuance, I wanted to post a tweet thread follow up to my blog. I've pulled updated data, laid out my argument again, and compared the 3 EIPs below. I still strongly stand behind EIP-1234 and am very against EIP-1295.
2/ First let's revisit my post. I theorize that since network participants are paying for network security, you can create a baseline against another chain to analyze if you are overpaying or underpaying versus said chain. For my Ethereum comparison I take Bitcoin.
3/ Taking a quick look at the ETH:BTC market cap ratio vs. ETH:BTC daily miner incentive ratio (blocks+uncles+fees), we see that Ethereum has historically overpaid when compared to Bitcoin. We can also compare those ratios directly to see the current overpayment range is 1.5x-2x.
1/ Quick thread on crypto valuations and gain multiples. I’m tired of seeing bubble graphs that point out BTC and ETH’s >1000x multiples and saying it’s not sustainable. Crypto allows anyone to participate in early “funding rounds” unlike private rounds of traditional companies.
2/ Let’s use Facebook, which is currently valued at $600bn. If you look at the graph of $FB stock since IPO, then you’d be led to believe that FB has only risen ~5.5x since IPO. This is not a fair comparison to crypto, we need to look at the early funding rounds for FB.
3/ Here’s a schedule of $FB funding rounds before IPO. In total they raised around $2.5bn. In looking at their original Series A, the company was valued at $85.3mn. So, early investors of Facebook are up 7033x. Sound familiar now?