The Hoarse Whisperer Profile picture
Jun 27, 2018 6 tweets 2 min read Read on X
This take and others like it keep popping up on my feed.

The vast majority of them were written by white people and then shared by other white ppl.

Us white folks are not the primary target or victims here - and we're telegraphing our obliviousness to that with these takes.

1/
If your first reaction is to fire off a #notallwhitepeople reply, don't.

If it ain't about you, don't make it about u.

There is nothing more off-putting than when someone personalizes something not about them and then insists on proving they're an Above-Average White Person™.
These takes are well-intended. They're worthy of discussion. They're understandable.

But when it comes to matters of oppression, persecution, violence and abuse, the most threatened and vulnerable get to lead.

Their voices should carry furthest.
An alliance where the least vulnerable largely ignore or diminish the rising fears of the most vulnerable isn't an alliance at all.

It conveniences the least affected at the potentially catastrophic expense of the people most at risk.

That ain't an alliance.
So, my fellow ppl of good heart, I'm asking ya:

No matter how much it may seem to you that civility and leading with love and going high are the right answers, don't talk over the people yelling that the risk is too great, the costs too high and the urgency too severe for that.
I have been palpably uncomfortable reading many of the takes from White Left Twitter these past couple days.

Our allies are sounding the alarm but we're too busy telegraphing our privilege to hear it.

Alliances protect the members most at risk - that starts with hearing them.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with The Hoarse Whisperer

The Hoarse Whisperer Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @TheRealHoarse

Oct 5, 2018
Ok, hear me out here for a second.

We have a weekly tradition on my timeline.

Every Friday, I ask people for one good thing that happened in their lives that week.

I’m sure none of us feel much like doing that today...

1/
However, this tradition matters to me.

It goes back a lot further than my Twitter tenure.

I went through some serious sh** a few years back when everything in my life burned down.

One of the things that got me through it was always looking for at least SOMETHING good.

2/
It wasn’t even the FINDING IT that mattered. It was the act of looking.

It takes your eyes off of the wreckage and reminds you that even when it seems all bad, there is at least some good.

So, even if it’s forced, it matters this week. Probably more than most.

3/
Read 4 tweets
Oct 5, 2018
Just gonna lay this down here...

Behind the public facade of McConnell being all in on Kav, Treason Turtle knows that R voters tend to vote best when they're voting angry.

Repubs got their best polling news in two years this week. The potential for a Kav loss woke the base.

1/
While a highly public defeat would seem like just that - a defeat - McConnell inevitably knows that it could be just the ticket to saving control of the Senate in November.

In ordinary times, I'd see the push to vote on Kav as a dire sign.

Today though, not so fast...

2/
A Kavanaugh defeat at the hands of Murkowski, Collins and Manchin wouldn't hurt Murkowski or Collins much (if at all) but would hurt Manchin - and more importantly, would probably swing the generic ballot 3-5 points nationwide.

A loss here would be a win in 30 days.

3/
Read 5 tweets
Oct 3, 2018
I’m just going to gush for a second.

The NYT’s sprawling exposé on the fraudulent myth of a successful Donald J. Trump is just everything journalism is supposed to be.

It’s a soaring journalistic achievement of legwork and research. It’s a careful unraveling. A distillation.
1/
It’s the kind of comprehensive investigative reporting that topples tyrants and preserves democracies.

It is a masterwork.

A Pulitzer is due and all but assured.

2/
Yet, at the same time it is also an accidental confessional and partially indicting of the Times’ itself.

Tucked among the 13,000 words is a single paragraph about the Times’ role in erecting the false edifice of the swaggering, young impresario who never was.

2/
Read 6 tweets
Oct 3, 2018
Folks who have survived narcissists will get this one...

When you’re close to a narc, you develop an internal, subconscious weatherman.

You can read the room. You can feel the narc’s temperature like it’s air temp.

You can viscerally feel the volatility level. The danger.

1/
You can read their emotional state but more importantly, you can read what it means for YOUR emotional state.

It’s an “external locus of control”.

You pick up cues others wholly miss. You process shit you can’t explain.

It’s helpful and exhausting. Hypervigilance is both.

2/
With Trump, all of that is both helpful and not. It’s unfun but makes it all familiar.

Others with narc experience, weigh in here...

I can feel the Trump temp with not a whole lotta exposure. Just a glimpse is enough usually.

3/
Read 8 tweets
Sep 29, 2018
Y’all will invariably fill my mentions with endless chides about my fact-based dislike of Avenatti but here’s something that ought to be processed regardless:

The right LOVES Avenatti’s grandstanding. It’s the only good thing that happened for them this week.

1/
The right wants to spin all of the accusations against Kavanaugh as a political hitjob.

They want to turn attention from the actual accusers to the Dems attached to them. Avenatti, Feinstein, etc.

2/
The more political these victims, their coming forward, and their stories can be made to seem, the easier it is for the right to dismiss them as just a political assassination.

The WH has allegedly opted to prevent the FBI from interviewing Avenatti’s client, Julie Swetnick.

3/
Read 7 tweets
Sep 29, 2018
Tissue warning.

Yesterday, in the hall of the Senate, these two women found themselves facing Senator Jeff Flake with only a moment to change his mind.

The woman on the left, Ana Maria Achila, spoke first.

1/
Then, with the elevator doors closing, choked with emotion, desperate to be heard, desperate for all survivors of sexual assault to be heard, Maria Gallagher spoke.

“I was sexually assaulted.”

2/
Until that moment... with all the world watching... with cameras snapping... with the elevator doors about to close... she had told no one.

Maria Gallagher’s mother learned her daughter had been sexually assaulted the moment we did.

3/
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(