This take and others like it keep popping up on my feed.
The vast majority of them were written by white people and then shared by other white ppl.
Us white folks are not the primary target or victims here - and we're telegraphing our obliviousness to that with these takes.
1/
External Tweet loading...
If nothing shows, it may have been deleted
by @matthewjdowd view original on Twitter
If your first reaction is to fire off a #notallwhitepeople reply, don't.
If it ain't about you, don't make it about u.
There is nothing more off-putting than when someone personalizes something not about them and then insists on proving they're an Above-Average White Person™.
These takes are well-intended. They're worthy of discussion. They're understandable.
But when it comes to matters of oppression, persecution, violence and abuse, the most threatened and vulnerable get to lead.
Their voices should carry furthest.
An alliance where the least vulnerable largely ignore or diminish the rising fears of the most vulnerable isn't an alliance at all.
It conveniences the least affected at the potentially catastrophic expense of the people most at risk.
That ain't an alliance.
So, my fellow ppl of good heart, I'm asking ya:
No matter how much it may seem to you that civility and leading with love and going high are the right answers, don't talk over the people yelling that the risk is too great, the costs too high and the urgency too severe for that.
I have been palpably uncomfortable reading many of the takes from White Left Twitter these past couple days.
Our allies are sounding the alarm but we're too busy telegraphing our privilege to hear it.
Alliances protect the members most at risk - that starts with hearing them.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Behind the public facade of McConnell being all in on Kav, Treason Turtle knows that R voters tend to vote best when they're voting angry.
Repubs got their best polling news in two years this week. The potential for a Kav loss woke the base.
1/
While a highly public defeat would seem like just that - a defeat - McConnell inevitably knows that it could be just the ticket to saving control of the Senate in November.
In ordinary times, I'd see the push to vote on Kav as a dire sign.
Today though, not so fast...
2/
A Kavanaugh defeat at the hands of Murkowski, Collins and Manchin wouldn't hurt Murkowski or Collins much (if at all) but would hurt Manchin - and more importantly, would probably swing the generic ballot 3-5 points nationwide.
The NYT’s sprawling exposé on the fraudulent myth of a successful Donald J. Trump is just everything journalism is supposed to be.
It’s a soaring journalistic achievement of legwork and research. It’s a careful unraveling. A distillation.
1/
It’s the kind of comprehensive investigative reporting that topples tyrants and preserves democracies.
It is a masterwork.
A Pulitzer is due and all but assured.
2/
Yet, at the same time it is also an accidental confessional and partially indicting of the Times’ itself.
Tucked among the 13,000 words is a single paragraph about the Times’ role in erecting the false edifice of the swaggering, young impresario who never was.
2/
Y’all will invariably fill my mentions with endless chides about my fact-based dislike of Avenatti but here’s something that ought to be processed regardless:
The right LOVES Avenatti’s grandstanding. It’s the only good thing that happened for them this week.
1/
The right wants to spin all of the accusations against Kavanaugh as a political hitjob.
They want to turn attention from the actual accusers to the Dems attached to them. Avenatti, Feinstein, etc.
2/
The more political these victims, their coming forward, and their stories can be made to seem, the easier it is for the right to dismiss them as just a political assassination.
The WH has allegedly opted to prevent the FBI from interviewing Avenatti’s client, Julie Swetnick.
3/
Yesterday, in the hall of the Senate, these two women found themselves facing Senator Jeff Flake with only a moment to change his mind.
The woman on the left, Ana Maria Achila, spoke first.
1/
Then, with the elevator doors closing, choked with emotion, desperate to be heard, desperate for all survivors of sexual assault to be heard, Maria Gallagher spoke.
“I was sexually assaulted.”
2/
Until that moment... with all the world watching... with cameras snapping... with the elevator doors about to close... she had told no one.
Maria Gallagher’s mother learned her daughter had been sexually assaulted the moment we did.
3/