@sev@ap.sevvie.ltd 🈲 Profile picture
Jun 27, 2018 18 tweets 6 min read Twitter logo Read on Twitter
(1) The #California Legislature is panicking tonight. They're currently presented with a watered-down #ConsumerProtection bill that would require tech companies to disclose the data collected on users, and delete the data collected on them at request. leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavC…
(2) This bill poses a huge threat to the profits of FAANG corporations, and it poses a threat to the companies who rely on this data to sell advertisers and political groups analytics on prospective consumers/voters.

Why is it such a problem, though?
(3) The #CCPA is actually quite milquetoast, as it's written now. But if they don't pass this bill, California has a much bigger problem coming for them in November: the will of the people.
(4) As it stands right now, #CCPA is passive. It gives consumers the right to REQUEST disclosure of the data held on them, and request that that data be deleted. Companies like #Facebook, who thrive off collecting and analyzing user data, will still be allowed to do this.
(5) Sure, it will lead to many people filing requests to find out what data is held by these companies, and to delete that data, but it puts the onus on the consumer to protect themselves.

That's not what the bill that will inevitably replace it will look like, if this fails.
(6) If the California Legislature doesn't pass this, and Governor Jerry Brown doesn't sign it, though, the man who funded this bill in the first place will be coming back with another come voting season, this November. And with it, public debates on the subject.
(7) A public debate on the subject of consumer privacy, and the collection of user data to be sold to politicians, advertisers, etc., would be a nightmare for #FAANG and related companies. No longer would they get to present themselves as the good guys.
(8) How did California get itself into this catch-22 for its most profitable sector?

It's all thanks to a real-estate developer from San Francisco, who happened to have the money necessary to hold companies like Facebook and Amazon to account: Alistair McTaggart.
Alistair McTaggart (@mcthoughtful) invested $3 million into a campaign that, up until this month, most people thought would be a complete failure, based on a very simple idea:

"I want to be able to go to Amazon and find out who they sold my information to."
(10) McTaggart, over the last year, collected 600,000 signatures demanding action be taken by the Legislature to protect consumer privacy -- lest the problem become a ballot initiative in November 2018. And it looks like it's working.
(11) California has until 28 Jun to pass this legislation into law. The media, who are complicit in the exploitation of consumer's data for profits, have remained quiet on this subject up until this point, but they won't be able to stay quiet if AB-375 doesn't pass.
(12) "If it doesn’t [pass], we will proceed to the November election We are content either way, as we feel that both the legislative solution, and our initiative, provide tremendously increased privacy rights to Californians.”

(13) That's McTaggart, in a statement regarding the political catch-22. He's not a dumb man in the slightest.

These tech companies can barely address the proposal directly, though. Instead, they've manipulatively tried to paint this as a threat to jobs in California.
(14) And the media companies which rely so heavily on Google, Facebook, etc., have thrown out all journalistic integrity on the subject, barely even writing about it unless they're publishing opposition statements verbatim:

(15) "This ballot measure disconnects California. It is unworkable, requiring the internet and businesses in California to operate differently than the rest of the world -- limiting our choices, hurting our businesses, and cutting our connection to the global economy."
(16) At this point, you should be familiar with this kind of hyperbole -- it's the exact same kind of hyperbole used with any political initiative which poses a risk to someone's unending source of ill-gotten wealth.
(17) #CCPA is one of the best things to happen for consumers regarding the Internet in a long time. And whether it passes now, or becomes a ballot issue in November, it exposes weaknesses in these #FAANG companies' armour of moral superiority.
(18) These oligopolists are going to be seeing a lot more legislation coming down on their heads in 2019 and 2020. No longer will the public see them as morally-righteous entities which can do no wrong.

Thank God.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh

Keep Current with @sev@ap.sevvie.ltd 🈲

@sev@ap.sevvie.ltd 🈲 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!


Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @sevvierose

Oct 6, 2018
I know I'm not the purest anarchist in the bunker.

My preference for obsolescence and deconstruction leaves me a passive follow-behind amidst the #collapsitarian and #btfsttg friends I have.

But there is one point on which I will inevitably be considered radical:
The governmental monopoly on violence.

Like all government-enabled trusts and monopolies, the few permitted to "provide for the common defense", often called the military-industrial complex but also including the intelligence community complexes, lock out competition.
In doing so, the individual's right to self defense is destroyed.

And make no mistake. You have the right to defend yourself. A right to bear arms is a right to assert oneself in equal force against tyrannical government using violence against you.
Read 10 tweets
Aug 22, 2018
(1) The story of #RubyRidge is nothing but heartbreaking.

Let's take a moment to discuss a story the Federal Government would rather be forgotten. A story of a family that only wanted to worship their God, raise their children, and be left alone.
(2) #StoryTime. Ruby Ridge is an outstretch of mountains in the northernmost part of Idaho, in a county named Boundary, as it rests right along the Canadian border, between the Washington and Montana borders.

When someone wants to be left alone, Ruby Ridge is one place they go.
(3) One person who wished nothing more than to be left alone was Randy Weaver. Weaver was a devout Christian & US Army vet who had become disillusioned with his government; in the early 1980's, he moved his family to a 20-acre plot of land on Ruby Ridge and built himself a home.
Read 27 tweets
Jul 17, 2018
(1) I find this to be a fascinating interview. Chris Wallace sits down with President Putin.

(2) Wallace is clearly trying to frame his questions to force the false pretense of Russians hacking into an e-mail account being tantamount to election interference.

But Putin isn't playing that game.
(3) Putin LAUGHS at Chris Wallace's attempts to sound smart.

He doesn't even look at the papers Wallace tries to hand over -- and why would he? He knows what Units #26165 and #74455 do. They're part of his government.
Read 23 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!


0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy


3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!