1/ “Once Petrillo [Cohen’s new lawyer] fully assumes his role, a joint defense agreement Cohen shared with the president, which allowed their lawyers to share information and documents with each other, will come to an end, ABC News has learned.”
2/ “At that point, the legal interests of the president of the United States and his longtime personal attorney could quickly become adversarial.”
3/ “He has not been charged with any crime. But on the advice of his attorney, Cohen declined to address specific questions about matters currently under investigation.”
4/ Cohen believes Mueller will not FIND ANY EVIDENCE THAT HE HAD ANY ILLEGAL OR IMPROPER DEALINGS WITH THE RUSSIANS.
This is weaselly, and it’s probably what Cohen’s new attorney Petrillo has advised him to say.
5/ It’s weaselly because there is a difference between saying he had no illegal or improper dealings with the Russians and saying that he believes Mueller will not FIND any evidence that he had them.
6/ It is, at least implicitly, an admission that he had dealings with Russians that are under scrutiny; whether the feds will find that they were illegal or improper is unsettled, according to Cohen’s off the record remarks.
7/
8/ This, too, is significant, because it tells us that the Trump Tower meeting is under investigation, not by Mueller (or not just by Mueller), but by the DOJ office in SDNY.
9/ It’s an interesting question how long the SDNY US AG’s office has been involved in this part of the investigation. We do know that the REFERRAL for the RAID came from MUELLER’s office in Wash DC. #michaelcohen#mueller
10/ So the question arises: what did Mueller come across in his investigation that prompted a referral and the extraordinary court warrant to raid Cohen, and what was the evidence about that the feds felt Cohen might be destroying? #michaelcohen#mueller
11/ Not likely that it was about taxi medallions or tax evasion. This increases the likelihood (but does not prove) that the raid was looking for evidence relevant to the RUSSIA investigation, not taxi medallions or run of the mill tax evasion stuff. #michaelcohen#mueller
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I posted this to Twitter a long time ago. It’s from Yuri Felshtinsky and Vladimir Pribylovsky, The Corporation: Russia and the KGB in the Age of President Putin. Encounter Books. 2008, pp. 40-41 (not available online):
(THREAD) Collins votes YES, so Kavanaugh’s confirmed.
This is the finale of the confirmation VOTE, but it is NOT the end of the #Kavanaugh ISSUE. 1/14
The FBI “investigation” was a sham, and that makes Collins’ special pleading for her YES vote a sham. It was a sickening performance. 2/14
The fatal weakness of her defense of her vote is that there was no meaningful investigation. Merely seeking corroboration in the form of direct, eyewitness testimony from the participants of the 1 Jul 1982 meeting does not constitute a meaningful investigation. 3/14
A subjective impression, admittedly, but in the pics and videos I have seen, Senate Rs look grim and worried--even, on occasion, angry.
D claim that this was a cover-up (20+ witnesses not called) is getting traction. No adequate push back from Rs yet.
McConnell saying on the floor that the Senate must vote to confirm b/c “in this country you’re not guilty until proven innocent” has this whole matter so wrong (it’s a job interview, Mitch, not a trial) that he must be feeling a little desperate.
(THREAD) The predicted early conclusion of the FBI background check on #Kavanaugh that has been reported by Politico and the WSJ is surprising and cause for anxiety and concern, but let’s look try hard to look on the (possibly) bright side. 1/8
We must keep in mind that this investigation is essentially a background check on #Kavanaugh, in light of newly surfaced allegations of belligerent drunkenness and sexual violence alleged against him by Ford and others. 2/8
So this investigation is more about Kavanaugh and his nomination than it is about Ford or any other accusers, and while the FBI does not reach conclusions, it does uncovers facts, and presents those facts to others so they can better reach their own conclusions. 3/8