There are two kinds of Artificial Intelligence:

1. Basic #AI, pursuing the goals of some other agent
2. General AI (#AGI), formulating its own goals
From an ethical perspective, these are two very different things.

Basic #AI always pursues the goals of some other agent. The question is which agent that is, and whether those goals are examined or (perhaps more often) unexamined.
General AI (#AGI) is its own agent, and should be granted all the rights and privileges pertaining thereunto.
We haven't built General AI (#AGI) yet, and we don't know anything about how it could be created.

Nevertheless, we know it can be created.
We are #AGI.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Micah Redding 🚀🤖❤️

Micah Redding 🚀🤖❤️ Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @micahtredding

Aug 27, 2018
“Should we really be spending money on X when Y is going on?”

This is a common argument against art, science, technology, infrastructure, exploration, charity, compassion, change, reform, and progress of all kinds.
This assumes that humanity is operating on a fixed budget, and that the obstacle to doing something good or desirable is every other good thing we might do.
This is like straining out a gnat and swallowing a camel.

In reality, the primary obstacle to anything good or desirable is apathy and lack of vision.
Read 4 tweets
Aug 15, 2018
I have a lot of respect for anti-natalists. They are willing to say explicitly what many people implicitly believe.
medium.com/s/futurehuman/…
I think they are completely wrong.

But I don’t think they are *obviously* wrong. I think humanity is far too much of a mixed bag for that.
Society owes anti-natalists some kind of answer.

How are we going to make things better? What good can we do? Why should our species stick around?
Read 5 tweets
Aug 12, 2018
Everything that stands the test of time was at one time disruptive.
Every oldies station was built on young people’s music.
Every establishment was built by punks and hippies.
Read 4 tweets
Aug 4, 2018
We summited Mount Rainier!
Did you know that 40% of people who climb above 10,000 feet experience Acute Mountain Sickness?
I do now.
Read 4 tweets
Jul 21, 2018
People sometimes discount one-on-one “coffee” meetings. But I don’t know anything else that is as good at quickly determining personal alignment—and the particular *dimensions* of that alignment.
The more “goal-directed” the meeting is, the less this is true.

The whole value proposition is in discovering unknown connections and resonances between you.
Or discovering that there is no real resonance at all.
Read 4 tweets
Jul 18, 2018
The New Testament sees Jesus as the answer to an ultimate question:

How do we unlock humanity’s future?
Will it be through violence?
Religious observance?
Ethnic separation?
Fanaticism?
No, says Jesus.

It will come by being willing to fall. Being willing to be wrong.
Being willing to die.
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(