The Gender Recognition Act Consultation is now open:
"We want to be absolutely clear – we are not proposing to amend the existing
equality exceptions relating to single- and separate- sex services in the Equality
Act."
It starts with this, which is repeated throughout the documentation:
"The consultation focuses on the Gender Recognition Act 2004.
We are not proposing any amendments to the Equality Act 2010."
It goes on, quite forcefully to say:
"This consultation does not consider the question of whether trans people exist, whether they have the right to legally change their gender, or whether it is right for a person of any age to identify with another gender, or with no gender."
"Trans and non-binary people are members of our society and should be treated with respect. Trans people already have the right to legally change their gender, and there is no suggestion of this right being removed."
"This consultation simply asks how best government might make the existing process under the Gender Recognition Act a better service for those trans and non-binary people who wish to use it."
The Equality Impact Assessment also states:
"The consultation is not expected to have an impact on the need to eliminate
discrimination and other prohibited conduct on grounds of sex."
But does say:
"The fact that the Government has no intention to change the Equality Act 2010 should help to reduce concerns."
Also surprising, but sensible, is this:
"The Government has decided not to consult on reducing the age limit at this
time."
No age change for GRCs, for now.
The consultation even talks about the impact on lesbians.
IT TALKS ABOUT LESBIANS!
"Some lesbian groups are opposed to any relaxation of the requirements and the proposals may impact negatively on the need to foster good relations between trans people and these groups..." 1/2
"...This impact can be mitigated by the consultation itself, which permits these concerns to be discussed and taken into account, and by maintaining the exceptions in the Equality Act." 2/2
This consultation has legal input written all over it and I am a little bit DELIGHTED.
There are good questions in the consultation that they seek input on:
"Do you think that the operation of the single-sex and separate-sex service
exceptions in relation to gender reassignment in the Equality Act 2010 will be
affected by changing the Gender Recognition Act?"
"(B) If you provide a single or separate sex service, do you feel confident in
interpreting the Equality Act 2010 with regard to these exemptions?"
Something I hoped they would look at is s.22 GRA, which they do in this question:
"Do you think the privacy and disclosure of information provisions in section 22 of the Gender Recognition Act are adequate?"
Lots to say here in response to all these questions. I'm sure there will be much debate over the next few days and weeks.
The GRA can be a whole lot clearer. It needs to use the terms sex and gender more appropriately at the very least. Opportunity for that clarity is now here.
In relation to the Equality Act:
"The Government does not intend to make any amendments to the existing exceptions in the EA 2010 associated with the ‘gender reassignment’ protected characteristic."
"However, the Government recognises that concerns have been raised about the potential implications of reforming the GRA on the operation of these."
As such, the Government is keen to collect evidence and opinion from all voices about the potential implications of GRA reform on the EA in order to inform its decision making. In particular, the Government is interested on what having a GRC might mean for the [EA] exceptions."
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
This has crept in to interpretations of the Equality Act, relating to single-sex services. It misrepresents the test.
If you are providing a service you can provide it for women only under para 27 of Schedule 3 of the Equality Act.
If the targeted provision is a proportionate (not over the top) means of meeting a legitimate aim (a good reason) and meets one of the conditions in 27(2-7) (e.g. need) it is it lawful to provide it to women only.
(1) How easy it is for people to understand and enforce their rights under the Equality Act?
@NameofWoman@MaryDal78252417 (2) How well enforcement action under the Equality Act works as a mechanism for achieving widescale change?
@NameofWoman@MaryDal78252417 (3) How effective and accessible tribunals and other legal means of redress under the Equality Act are, and what changes would improve those processes?
Please don't forget to respond to the other inquiry into the Equality Act 2010, which closes tomorrow.
If you can highlight one thing, let it be that ambiguity in the terms male, female, man, woman, gender reassignment, and so on must be reviewed: #EA2010 parliament.uk/business/commi…
The key question is this:
“How easy it is for people to understand and enforce their rights under the Equality Act?”
I think it is really important that non-lawyers answer this. Is the Equality Act accessible to you? Would you know how to make a claim that your rights had been infringed? Would you know how to access funding to bring a claim? Are the costs of bringing a claim a barrier?
“Any criminal offence which is perceived by the victim or any other person, to be motivated by hostility or prejudice, based on a ...”
“...person's disability or perceived disability; race or perceived race; or religion or perceived religion; or sexual orientation or perceived sexual orientation or transgender identity or perceived transgender identity."
On the other sides of this multifaceted debate are rational groups like @ManFRIDAY_@Womans_Place_UK and @fairplaywomen who seek, as a minimum, preservation of the rights of women and girls. Worth following.