John Bull Profile picture
Jul 4, 2018 27 tweets 8 min read Twitter logo Read on Twitter
Okay people. Repeat after me:

STRIPPING GTR OF ITS FRANCHISE IS NOT A VIABLE THREAT.

Why? Because the DfT tried to be clever back in 2017 and shot themselves in the foot. 🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️

Read on... #rail #london #thameslinkfail /1
So. Important thing to remember: The GTR Franchise ISN'T just Thameslink. It's Southern (and bits) as well, all coming together in what was meant to be a super-franchise. /2
Now - if y'all remember - that Southern (and to a lesser extent Thameslink) parts of the network were ALSO a massive clusterf*ck shortly after GTR took over - because of the issue of Driver Only Operation. /3
You can argue about the merits of DOO onto that part of the network (we wrote about it a lot on @lonrec at the time: ) but what was pretty obvious was that DfT wanted it there. And they were going to use the new franchise to enforce that change /4
Now in part they did that by writing the franchise specification in a way that meant GTR sort of had no choice but to push that out. But both they, and GTR, also knew that would make things a bit... well... strikey. /5
Now reading between the lines, it's pretty clear that - officially or not - DfT knew that if they wanted to use GTR as a blunt instrument on DOO, they were going to have to be VERY NICE to GTR in return. /6
So while lots of politicians were grandstanding back then about revoking the franchise (deja-vu!), behind the scenes DfT were doing everything possible NOT to enforce the full penalty clauses on performance, so as to scratch GTR's back. /7
This isn't just my opinion. The performance (and DfT's reaction) was so bad that it triggered a bunch of parliamentary investigations (again, Deja vu! yay!) /8
Indeed one of those resulted in one of my favourite committee reports of recent years:

"The House of Commons Committee of Public Accounts report on Rail franchising in the UK"

(Yes I have favourite committee reports. You mean you don't?! WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU PEOPLE? 🤓) /9
It was published in April 2018, and if you want an absolute snapshot of just how much the DfT has forgotten about how to scope and run railways then look no further. You can find it here, but don't worry - I'm gonna pick out the pertinent bits below publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201719/cm… /10
Ya see, one of the things it covers is how the DfT approached penalising GTR for the performance issues after the driver debacle. Or, more specifically, how they didn't. /11
This is because the GTR franchise penalty clauses included the standard definition of strikes as a 'force majeure' event - i.e. one GTR COULDN'T be penalised for. Wanna guess what happened next? /12
Yes you got it. GTR started booking pretty much ANY DISRUPTION they could loosely connect to strikes as being 'force majeure'. which, well fair play. It's their right to try. Luckily, the taxpayer is protected because the DfT get to decide whether they're bullshitting and... /13
...oh. Shit. /14
"WHY WOULD THEY DO THAT?" you shout.

Welll, because they pretty much knew GTR had them by the cylinder pistons because of the whole strike-busting thing. Which also meant they couldn't cancel the contract despite lots of statements saying they were considering it (deja vu!) /15
Don't worry though! The DfT told the Committee, they had a cunning plan to prevent this happening again. Cunning like a fox who has been to cunning school and then cunning university:

They'd done a deal with GTR. GTR would pay UP FRONT for ALL future disruption thru 2018 /16
Of course the committee are all "you what? you've let them PRE-PAY just £5m for delays you don't know about yet?! WHY WOULD YOU DO THAT YOU MAD PEOPLE.

DfT: "Meh. Couldn't be arsed to manage them, bro. It'll probably be fine." /17
Which (finally) brings us to the key thing here: unbelievably, the lowballed, pre-pay part of that deal ISN'T THE WORST THING about it. It's that in making that deal, the DfT pretty much demonstrated that the penalty regime in the franchise wasn't fit for purpose /18
Which has left a MASSIVE contractual elephant in the room - which the committee instantly spotted and no doubt GTR's legal department have too - if they weren't prepared to enforce it before, then they can't really enforce it at all: /19
So when you hear Theresa May or Chris Grayling throwing shade about how they're going to slap down GTR remember 2 things:

- GTR have ALREADY PAID for this disruption
- In asking them to do so, the DfT have (probably) fucked up their ability to enforce the contract penalties /20
So either May or Grayling have somehow managed to hide under a rock and avoid learning that, or they're utterly bullshitting passengers, the press and MPs in the hope everything will blow over and y'all go away.

I know which my money is on. /21
Even if they - or the DfT's lawyers - think they can revoke the franchise, then that recent Nick Brown email shows that GTR's lawyers sure as hell think they can't. Not without a bloody fight for compensation.

And sorry, but I know which group of lawyers I'd rather trust /21
As usual, you can find our detailed coverage of this whole debacle on our website. Key bits here:

londonreconnections.com/2018/holy-grai…
londonreconnections.com/2018/the-cicad…

If you like what we do (we're volunteers!) you can help us pay the bills on Patreon here:

patreon.com/lonrec/ /end
ADDENDUM: By request, here's a breakdown of Grayling's weird (and hard to justify) comment about revoking the franchise based on 'incompetence'
SECOND ADDENDUM: As usual, @LilianGreenwood attempted to hold their feet to the fire at Transport Quesitons this morning.

You can see her ask about THIS VERY ISSUE here: parliamentlive.tv/Event/Index/c0…
The non-answer reply by @JoJohnsonUK probably tells us MORE than an actual answer would have done:

Because if it WASN'T an issue, then it would have been in both his and Grayling's interest to say so,
The fact that he couldn't tells us that AT THE VERY LEAST this has added unnecessary complexity to the process, which then in turn raises the bar before it becomes worthwhile (to the DfT) to try and withdraw the franchise.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with John Bull

John Bull Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @garius

Oct 5, 2018
Okay. History time!

You've probably seen photos of Commonwealth war cemeteries, with rows of white graves. They're heartbreaking images.

What you DON'T see are the thousands of small, tragic stories on each gravestone.

So I'm going to share some with you here. /1 #history #WW1
These stories exist because although every stone is similar, family members were able to pay to have a small, custom inscription made on each stone.

Which is why on Pvt J Low's grave you'll find this desperately sad inscription:

"Until we meet again. Mother." /2
Of course, the ABSENCE of anything is even sadder. Too often you'll see the nine saddest words in the English language:

"A soldier of the Great War. Known only unto God"

Those words appear when we know a body is there but not who. It was Rudyard Kipling who came up with them /3
Read 23 tweets
Sep 18, 2018
Nah. Because there's something ELSE the original Predator got right and which pretty much every sequel has screwed up.

HUMAN DRAMA isn't the core plot of original Predator. THE HUNT is. /1
Predator is very cleverly written to SUGGEST that human drama is the plot (the rescue, Dillon's actions, Anna's capture) but actually they're all micro-plots.

That is, they're narrative devices that combine to further the ACTUAL plot - which is 'the Predator is on a hunt'/2
That adds to the horror and tension, because not only are the characters not able to beat the Predator, but they also AREN'T in control of the plot. They're passengers. /3
Read 22 tweets
Aug 31, 2018
So continuing last night's brief historical diversion, let's talk Admiral Bertram Ramsay. Logistical genius, Naval commander of both Dunkirk and Normandy and the most important British naval hero you've probably never heard of /1
Ramsay was a Londoner (paging @LondonHistorian) who had been a solid destroyer captain in the Dover patrol in WW1. By 1938 he'd retired, but the rapid expansion of the Admiralty in 1938 meant they needed (command) bums on seats, so they started asking old officers to help out /2
It was Churchill himself who persuaded Ramsay to put on his uniform again, and he was given a temporary commission as a Vice-Admiral. Not because anyone thought he was OMG AMAZEBALLS (although he was well regarded), but because they needed someone to run stuff at Dover. /3
Read 18 tweets
Aug 15, 2018
GRAYLING BINGO TIME!

Drink if you have "set up an enquiry" on your card.
Drink if you have "it was only a small amount of routes"
Drink if you have "unions are the problem"
Read 4 tweets
Jul 22, 2018
Okay kids, it's time! The Conservative prospects have ALL done their ConHome interviews. So our last chance to see their (often) weird views on transport before the party spin machine tells them to focus on dogwhistle racism.

SO LETS GO ON A MONORAIL HUNT! /1
Now I know it's not yet 11am, but that DOESN'T mean this isn't a drinking game. So the normal rules apply. Even if all you have to hand is tea, you have to drink when someone says:

1) financial blackhole
2) driverless
3) strikes
4) something about how they love driving /2
Ready? Cool beans. So lets start with Andrew Rosindell, current MP for Romford.

Things you should know about Andy for context:

- Loves Brexit
- Loves the Union Jack
- Wants the BBC to play the national anthem each day
- Not a big fan of equality and/or gay marriage /3
Read 51 tweets
Jul 5, 2018
Okay. Scanning through mentions. Lots of questions about the "15th July Timetable"

So let's take a look at what that really means (vs how it's being 'sold' in some quarters) #thameslink #rail #london /1
So let's get one thing straight up front:

The July timetable ISN'T about providing more services overall.

It's about formalising one that frees up GTR to resume driver training again, with the LEAST risk of disruption. /2
So if you think (or have been told) that it means you're getting YOUR train back: well... sorry. probably not.

If it's not in the timetable already (even if it's always showing 'CANCELLED') then you probably ain't getting it back /3
Read 15 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(