Trump (surprise) has his facts wrong about our suit, but what's worse: The plaintiffs @protctdemocracy represents are 3 Americans (not crazies) who had private lives hacked & dumped on web. His job is to protect not attack them. Also: This case isn't over protectdemocracy.org
So for example, a few things @realDonaldTrump is misleading about. First, the case was not brought by @DNC. It was brought by @protctdemocracy on behalf of American voters who were injured when their private info like SS#s were hacked and dumped to the world. /2
These voters sued the Trump Campaign for conspiring with Russia to dump their private data online in violation of their privacy rights and civil rights. See more here: protectdemocracy.org/privacylawsuit/ /3
Second, Trump did not "win" the case as he claims. As is being reported by many in the media in response to his tweet, the Judge ruled only that the case was in the wrong court. newsweek.com/donald-trump-r… /4
We disagree with that ruling and think it gets the law wrong but, unlike how Trump reacts to court decisions he dislikes (more on that here protectdemocracy.org/update/trump-a…), we respect the Judge and the Court's decision. /5
But in making that decision, the Judge went out of her way to state that “it bears emphasizing that this Court’s ruling is not based on a finding that there was no collusion between defendants and Russia during the 2016 presidential election.” /6 protectdemocracy.org/update/cockrum…
Far from "winning" this case or being absolved of conspiring with Russia, this case could very likely proceed in a different court. The conspiracy claims are very alive and real. /7
Third, the only one making excuses about elections is Trump himself, who keeps denying reality and endangering our national security in order to pretend he won the popular vote. /9
We @protctdemocracy are instead bringing people from left & right together around agenda for protecting democracy. This week we rolled out our #RoadmapForRenewal - A Legislative Blueprint for the next Congress. We shared it w @realDonaldTrump today:
If you want to join our movement to @protctdemocracy and follow progress on the lawsuit Trump is clearly concerned about - and our countless other actions in defense of our great country's highest aspirations, follow us here: protectdemocracy.org/signup Happy 4th of July Week! /end
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
A short THREAD on a huge issue: A major thing missing to me so far in the #KennedyRetirement coverage is this: all Presidents who appoint justices might have those justices rule on their official acts, like policy initiatives or legislation. /1
But I cannot think of a prior example of a President appointing a justice who could rule on that President's personal exposure to serious criminal or civil liability. /2
Yet that's exactly what might happen here. Trump is currently under investigation on a range of fronts, from whether he obstructed justice to whether he colluded with Russia to whether his pre-presidency business dealings were on the up and up. /3
THREAD: Here’s one way to understand what’s going on with the Trump team legal memo, why they put it out, why it’s wrong, and why even if anyone buys it it doesn't help Trump. /1
External Tweet loading...
If nothing shows, it may have been deleted
by @juliehdavis view original on Twitter
The Trump lawyers are trying to pull a fast one in a few ways. First, they’re trying to say Trump can’t commit the crime of obstruction of justice because he runs the justice department and can do whatever he wants with it. /2
Trump floated this theory himself a few months back when he claimed to have “an absolute right” to do whatever he wants with the Justice Dept. /3