Esther Choo, MD MPH Profile picture
Jul 8, 2018 13 tweets 4 min read Twitter logo Read on Twitter
Interesting question that gets at my central concern about declaring a major interest in advancing careers of #WomeninMedicine or #MinoritiesinMedicine, particularly as a research interest - cc @NarjustDuma
The last time I gave a talk on gender bias in medicine, a faculty member asked me if it had hurt my career to speak on this topic. I was taken aback, but then realized it was a smart question.
It’s a high risk topic for a number of reasons:
1. Speaking on the negative biases & inequities women in medicine face evokes skepticism and defensiveness, and the tendency to mentally (or even verbally) undermine the speaker higher than usual.
2. As a researcher, I risk aligning myself with what could be considered a “soft” topic. Unpacking that, I think it comes down to a) not a clinical topic b) rarely fundable as a line of research and c) even when funded, for small $$ (with rare exceptions).
3. Beyond the implications to a researcher, presenting these topics can misfire if:
- it lacks hard data
- there is zero audience buy-in
- it is seen as only benefitting women, rather than the whole workplace
- it focuses only on the challenges & needs of mothers ...
- there’s a “we got this covered” attitude in the institution, rather than “how can we be (even) better?”
- it’s perceived as being scolding or even punitive

Overall, many landmines & ways it can be poorly received by the very people you are hoping to impress / align with
So I’m not certain that the biggest barrier is overcoming one’s own fears about speaking up; I think the risk of being devalued is REAL.
So does that mean I think we can’t give these talks or declare our interest in promoting careers of women / minorities in med? Of course not. We need to open this dialogue, even routinize it. We need research & education & advocacy.
But thinking in terms of being effective AND protecting you all from the potential career harms, I’d advise a few measures, most alluded to above.
- be as rigorous on this topic as you are for any clinical or research topic; pair narrative w data
- do not hinge arguments for change on fairness
- find male champions, as this message can’t come from women alone
- don’t frame this as a women’s problem: it is everyone’s problem
- before going into a talk, gauge the receptiveness of the chair & audience. A talk to a precontemplative audience is different than a talk to one activated for culture change
- for most people (not all): have a “hard” area of expertise that gets you in the door
IMHO (perhaps a too-skeptical one?), addressing the inequities faced by #WomeninMedicine and #minoritiesInMedicine are things we can talk about once we have buy-in, rather than the things that will earn us the buy-in. At least for now.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Esther Choo, MD MPH

Esther Choo, MD MPH Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @choo_ek

Sep 30, 2018
"What does it say about this country that this is the state of our discourse? That Kavanaugh even stands any chance of being made one of the most powerful figures in the American government, with control over life and liberty?" currentaffairs.org/2018/09/how-we…
"He went before the United States Senate and showed total contempt for his vow to tell the truth. He attempted to portray a highly esteemed doctor as a crazy person, by consistently misrepresenting the evidence. He treated the public like we were idiots..."
"... like we wouldn’t notice as he pretended he was ralphing during Beach Week from too many jalapeños, as he feigned ignorance about sex slang, as he misread his own meticulously-kept 1982 summer calendar, as he replied to questions about his drinking habits ..."
Read 7 tweets
Sep 27, 2018
One of the most emotional, awful parts of today for me: 1/2 thru Dr. Ford's opening statement, I became attuned to a sense of relief. It took me a second, then I realized I was reacting to:
-Her whiteness
-Her country club background
-Her level of education & sophistication
1/
Because surely *this* woman could be believed. A woman of color, a poor woman, an uneducated woman - these women would be dismissed, torn apart, stripped of credibility and humiliated well before the hearing today and utterly destroyed within it. 2/
And I realized the only reason I had a smidgen of hope that she would come out intact was that she was about as dominant culture as she could be, save for her gender. 3/
Read 6 tweets
Sep 7, 2018
Yale continues to elevate a School of Medicine faculty member known to have committed sexual harassment. This is how academic institutions foster a toxic culture for women yaledailynews.com/blog/2018/09/0…

This is my beloved alma mater, and I know we can do better @TIMESUPNOW @nytimes
Over 650 students, residents, faculty, and alumni have signed a letter to Yale President Salovey protesting this decision as well as Dean Alpern’s role in addressing harassment over the years, which included a reluctance to penalize Simons in any meaningful way.
In a painfully painful statement, Yale clarified that Simons had not been honored but rather removed from one highly prestigious endowed chair (only after protest from the family sponsoring the endowment) to another one: news.yale.edu/2018/09/06/uni…
Read 5 tweets
Aug 23, 2018
Apropos of nothing, I thought I'd muse a little on what pathological narcissists do when backed into a corner.
Narcissists are self-focused, have an inflated, grandiose sense of self, and rarely cede personal goals to other ideals.
They are not oblivious to threat to self: they simply have abnormal, extreme responses to it. On the one hand, they demonstrate deficient fear processing and can be oblivious to the potentially devastating consequences of pursuing their self-serving goals.
Read 7 tweets
Aug 16, 2018
Obama’s description of Aretha Franklin, and why she moved him, is just perfection:

newyorker.com/magazine/2016/…

“Nobody embodies more fully the connection between the African-American spiritual, the blues, R. & B., rock and roll—the way that hardship and sorrow were transformed ...
... into something full of beauty and vitality and hope. American history wells up when Aretha sings. That’s why, when she sits down at a piano and sings ‘A Natural Woman,’ she can move me to tears—...
...the same way that Ray Charles’s version of ‘America the Beautiful’ will always be in my view the most patriotic piece of music ever performed—because it captures the fullness of the American experience...
Read 4 tweets
Aug 8, 2018
Thrilled to work with @DGlaucomflecken to develop an infographic about correct nomenclature when discussing gender bias in academia. Follow along.
(By "work with" I mean I ranted for a while and he put together this whole infographic from it)
You all know this one... The Manel!
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(