Read on Twitter
Pennsylvania and Michigan are mentioned in the article.
"[A computer scientist] notes that election officials who purchased the systems likely were not aware of the potential risks they were taking...and didn’t understand the threat landscape to make intelligent decisions."
"[A computer scientist] notes that election officials who purchased the systems likely were not aware of the potential risks they were taking...and didn’t understand the threat landscape to make intelligent decisions."
"All of this raises questions about how many counties across the US had remote-access software installed—in addition to ES&S customers—and whether intruders had ever leveraged it to subvert elections."
Wyden: “ES&S needs to stop stonewalling & provide a full, honest accounting of equipment that could be vulnerable to remote attacks. When a corporation that makes half of America’s voting machines refuses to answer...basic cybersecurity questions, you have to ask what it's hiding
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
