Tweet

April 11th, 2023: Unroll (web method) is now working for Premium users! Log in to your account page and click on the "Unroll Thread" button.

Natasha Bertrand

@NatashaBertrand

Jul 19, 2018 • 3 tweets • 1 min read Twitter logo

Read on Twitter

Asked why he issued that statement in response to Trump's siding with Putin in Helsinki, DNI Dan Coats says: "I was just doing my job...I believed I needed to correct the record...I wish he had made a different statement but I think that, now, has been clarified." #AspenSecurity

More Coats: "The very pillar of democracy is the ability to have confidence that your leaders were elected legitimately." #AspenSecurity

Coats on Trump/Putin private meeting: "I don't know what happened in that meeting...I would've suggested [it be done] a different way, but that's not my call." Coats adds that "that risk is always there," when asked whether the Russians may have recorded the meeting.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

More from @NatashaBertrand

Natasha Bertrand

@NatashaBertrand

Jan 24, 2018

@DevinNunes

JUST IN: DOJ's Stephen Boyd has sent a letter to @DevinNunes saying release of *the memo* without review by DOJ/FBI would be "extraordinarily reckless." Says the memo purports to be based on "classified source materials that neither you nor most of" the committee "have seen."

Boyd also says in the letter that the release of the memo could violate an agreement that DOJ/FBI struck with Paul Ryan to share classified material with the House Intel committee

More DOJ: "We do not understand why the Committee would possibly seek to disclose classified and law enforcement sensitive information without first consulting with the relevant members of the intelligence community."

Read 4 tweets