We are now a coalition of 40+ large law firms and non-profit organizations, 6,000+ volunteer lawyers across the country, 2,000+ translators, social services providers, and others, all working together to address not only the immediate family separation crisis and asylum issues.
Last week, we launched our remote legal services project, drafting five "Request for Reinterview" briefs in under 12 hours for mothers who are separated and detained. This week, we are working to help drafting of as many as 350 Motions for Reconsideration for separated parents.
@lawyers4goodgov E.D @tracilove is currently on the ground in El Paso, Texas, building relationships with organizations providing front-line legal services to immigrant families, to determine the best ways for Project Corazon to structure and deliver remote legal services.
There are many organizations, including nonprofits and pro bono immigration attorneys who don’t get the press attention being paid to some other groups, but who are working 18-20 hour days to serve families. We continue to build relationships with them so we can work together.
Project Corazon also continues to coordinate groups of volunteer lawyers who work for a week at a time at family detention centers like Karnes and Dilley. In addition, we are also working to develop new on-the-ground programs in areas that are not already well-served.
We have also received and referred out to coalition partners several individual matters requiring in-person legal services. As Project Corazon continues to expand, we expect to receive more of these kinds of requests, and will reach out to our law firm partners for assistance.
At the request of Sen. Feinstein's office, we began to create a system for gathering & documenting information on the treatment of families at the border/in detention. We seek to establish a systematic, streamlined way to track & report on asylum-seeking families over time.
Thanks for supporting Project Corazon. While it was an urgent humanitarian crisis that brought us here, we have an opportunity to make a meaningful difference in the long-term, creating ways for pro bono lawyers to serve asylum-seeking families in America. lawyersforgoodgovernment.org/project-corazon
Imagine if a sitting Supreme Court Justice was involved in discussions about whether the US can imprison people
Without a trial
Without lawyers
And torture them-
And then lied about it
During his own confirmation hearing
<Thread>
When Brett Kavanaugh was nominated to become a judge in 2006, he was asked about his work in the Bush administration. Specifically he was questioned about the treatment of prisoners at Guantanamo Bay. He said he was “not involved in the questions about..detention of combatants.”
Problem is, a year later it came out that he WAS involved in some of these arguments.
We first thought Dilley isn’t inherently evil-just a large, emotionless machine running on bureaucratic inertia. Now we learn that for some, that’s not true. For them, Dilley is a torture chamber, built to cause the most extraordinary pain and exert devastating control over women
We have yet to see a single drug dealer, gang member or vandal bent on a life of crime in the US. That’s what they’ve risked their lives to escape, not what they intended to bring to America. And yet we expend enormous resources to keep these victims from victimizing us.
Men working at Dilley have to tread carefully, because many of their clients’ pains and indignities stem from their oppressed relationships with the men in their lives: abusive husbands, gang members, drunken relatives, indifferent police and government, and snakeheads.
It is therefore no surprise that some of the women receiving Credible Fear Interview preparation are reluctant to have a man sitting in on their prep team, are reluctant to reveal painful intimacies to men whose supportive attitudes and good will may seem foreign to them.
Would you support a Supreme Court nominee if a Senator asked the Attorney General to investigate that person for perjury?
What if that same nominee thought a president should be free from virtually any scrutiny while in office?
Both are part of Brett Kavanaugh’s record.
Thread
Kavanaugh worked in the Bush White House. Later, he testified at his confirmation hearing to become a federal judge and was asked about his role in the administration’s development of policies involving torture and treatment of detainees. He denied all knowledge and was confirmed
The next year, NPR reports came out which indicated Kavanaugh was indeed aware of these policies. Senator Durbin said “[h]e had to know he was misleading me and the committee and the people who were following this controversial nomination.”
While most of us spent the 4th of July with our families, intrepid Lawyers for Good Government volunteer attorney Veronica Walther was in Texas helping women apply for asylum.
Here is part of her harrowing report /2
I spent all of this Independence Day at #KarnesResidentialCenter Yes, it's a holiday but these women and children do not get a day off from detention so we do not take a day off from helping. There is more than enough work to do. /3