Arguments that #libraries are beneficial really don't have anything to do with the #consent argument against #taxation, so they are really quite uninteresting, and not at all even an argumentative response to the good professor. That being said, it's important to understand…
#Libraries are terribly underfunded, when they should be a top priority for civic spending. It is not inconsistent to be pro library funding and con taxation, if you argue for a #noncoercive yet still #compulsory financing source, i.e. Just Rent #LVT. Most libraries cannot…
accept donated books, because they simply cannot afford the staff and infrastructure required to preserve and maintain an ever-growing stock of physical texts. #Libraries must therefore concentrate on what items #librarians deem important or popular in their community. …
My local #library has a copy of Heino Engel's "The Japanese House". It's the only print copy of this tome I've ever seen, as you can imagine, not a popular book. I have pled with my small town library never to dispose of this book, but I fully expect to someday find it gone. …
In my previous life, I spent an enormous amount of my earnings on books, but in my current state, can no longer afford to house them. No library will take them. In the past few years, I have donated tens of thousands of dollars worth of books to my local charity shop…
which sells them for $1/ea, dispersing them into the community (hopefully), where they will languish instead of being shared. When I think of the amount of redundant printed materials we as a society cause to be manufactured compared with the climate crisis, I despair. …
I am, if I may say, a very intelligent, well-educated, and well-read person. My #library contained a dazzling array of often esoteric but always important knowledge and wisdom. My books were carefully chosen. I believe they deserve preservation, but who will pay for it? …
Imagine how much more we as a society could afford, if we did not spend as much private wealth on private #libraries, and instead used that money to fund public libraries. Imagine the savings in natural resources, alone! The issue of #taxation is an important issue, and…
as a #geolibertarian, I agree #taxation is #theft; however, #coercion in public finance is a solvable problem requiring no further analysis. It remains only to be implemented. If #consent is important to you, and it should be, work to establish reclamation of economic #rent…
rather than blathering on about how onerous you, the Chair of a university Economics department, find your piddling $495/yr in #library tax, whilst tens of thousands of your tax dollars are going to the military/security/police/prison-industrial complex, which affronts #liberty…
to a far greater extent, so much so that it is ludicrous to bleat about #librarytax. Your tax dollars are being used to commit crimes against humanity by the Trump Administration, but you want to complain about #library finance? Get a grip, sir, I implore you! Lives are at stake!
Lives which would be greatly enriched by public #libraries, even at dismal current funding levels. I've long said, #IfIHitTheLottery, establishing a #library would be among my top priorities, if for no other reason than it would make my personal collection public and preserve it.
The "great men" of American history expressed their #egotism by public works. #Libraries were among their prominent beneficiaries, institutions of #education and #art, similary featured. Only a paltry, petty miser would loathe or disparage even the appearance of public #service.
Aside from the squabblings of #socialists and #capitalists while #feudalist rent-seekers laugh all the way to their fractional-reserve banks, one major, fundamental aspect of our economy which can't be addressed by analysis of #property is the consequences of the #factory system.
And for that, we turn to Ralph #Borsodi, who detailed the evils of the #factory system in his book, "This Ugly Civilization", in 1929, following on from "The Distribution Age", of 1927.
' What the industrial revolution brought upon us was not the machine but the application of power to the operation of machines. Power did not introduce mankind to the machine. Power merely revolutionized the manner in which man used the machine.
The #legitimacy of any form of #government is not and cannot be based upon #consent, but upon how well it protects the rights of those who refuse to consent.
When the bullshit is stripped away, #Socialism is #theft, and can never be a moral form of political economy, because it cannot protect the rights of those who refuse to consent to the theft of their earned wealth. Those who do consent are not prevented under any other system…
7 years ago, I wrote "Flushing the Potty Panic" for @transadvocate. I opined the solution to unlawful #discrimination in access to public accommodations in which nudity is unavoidable—toilets, showers, locker/dressing/changing rooms—because "separate but equal" is illegal…
is to ensure via #law that a sufficient number of secure, single user, #disability-accessible, #family-friendly facilities are provided for all people who for any reason desire or require #privacy or assistance, in the manner of the #ADA Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990…
at the same time we ensure by law that all people have the right to be free from unlawful discrimination on the basis of sex, gender, sexual or affectional orientation, or gender identity, appearance, expression, or behavior, regardless of sex or gender assigned at birth…
Just blocked a whole slate of professional TERFs, assorted transphobes, and miscellaneous transmisiast miscreants. They are so boring, with their droning on about things they don't understand, especially the ones with PhDs. A doctorate is not proof against ignorance and fallacy.
The worst part of it is their egos are terribly inflated by the media platforms they've gained *precisely* because they attack people's humanity. Nothing sells like controversy, not even sex, but they take popularity as evidence of their superiority and bludgeon others with it.
What is truly disturbing is how many people who are ostensibly socially progressive and have large media platforms are insistently attacking trans women, such as Graham Linehan in the UK, Jesse Singal in the US, Chimamanda Adichie in Nigeria, and others more notorious globally.