Read on Twitter
Harvard U research “said a voter-registration page on the .@MissouriSOS website was among those ‘vulnerable to voter identity theft attacks’ by impostors who obtained various personal information.”
.@JayAshcroftMO “called the work a ‘bad study’...”
👇
news-leader.com/story/news/pol…
.@JayAshcroftMO “called the work a ‘bad study’...”
👇
news-leader.com/story/news/pol…
.@JayAshcroftMO
“doesn't believe” hackers could meddle
has “a lot of confidence” in our systems
expects MO elections “to remain secure”
“can’t see (hacking) happening”
doesn’t “have the sense that” the system was hacked
is “unaware of any attempt to hack”
👇
“doesn't believe” hackers could meddle
has “a lot of confidence” in our systems
expects MO elections “to remain secure”
“can’t see (hacking) happening”
doesn’t “have the sense that” the system was hacked
is “unaware of any attempt to hack”
👇
refuses to say “whether Missouri has undergone a risk & vulnerability assessment” with @DHSgov
says .@MissouriSOS Information Technology “makes it more difficult for people to know what we're doing." That’s oddly worded.
👇
says .@MissouriSOS Information Technology “makes it more difficult for people to know what we're doing." That’s oddly worded.
👇
“doesn't remember” if the Trump/Kobach so-called Voter Fraud Commission made any recommendations for Missouri.
Disbelief, confidence, and memory failure are all very convenient when you play for the team that the hacking benefits, .@JayAshcroftMO .@MissouriSOS.
#Complicit
Disbelief, confidence, and memory failure are all very convenient when you play for the team that the hacking benefits, .@JayAshcroftMO .@MissouriSOS.
#Complicit
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
