The chairs we inherited after the in-laws got a new dining set are worn to the point where a slicey-pokey corner of wood juts out from the threadbare upholstery. This is how my attempt at adulting these chairs will go: 1. research local upholsterers and find one with good reviews
2. contact them with a description of the chairs 3. become outraged about reupholstering prices while grudgingly acknowledging that, yeah, I guess upholsterers have to make a living 4. search for, and watch, videos on YouTube about doing your own reupholstering
5. research how much getting the materials will cost and try to find a local source for the materials 6. discover the need for a specialized piece of equipment 7. try, fail to find the piece of equipment on eBay for cheap
8. calculate how many chairs I'd need to reupholster to amortize the cost of the equipment 9. briefly consider going into reupholstering as a side-gig (bearing in mind that at this point I have yet to reupholster anything)
10. give up and buy new chairs at IKEA 11. research where to discard the old chairs (The city dump? The recycling depot? Some charity that restores used furniture?) 12. take the old chairs there, all the while feeling really guilty about being "wasteful."
This entire process will take me ~32 hours over ten days. Hours I probably should spend on my dissertation. #adulting
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
When I'm done dissertating I think I'll relaunch my editing business to focus exclusively on fixing indecipherable flowcharts, concept maps, and system charts.
I imagine "fixing" would mean "getting rid of" about 90% of the time.
I use mind maps and concept maps all the time, to clarify my own thinking. But the reason they work for me is that I see them being built, layer by layer, and I understand the shorthand I'm using. They're utterly meaningless to a naive reader.
*A thread about frequently asked questions that only my fellow language nerds are likely to care about*
I did a double-take when I read "Frequently asked questions for anglers."
I had to read on to confirm they meant [frequently asked questions] for (an audience of) anglers rather than questions that anglers are frequently asked.
I think it's interesting how this bit of ambiguity shows how we conceptualize "frequently asked questions" as a whole entity.
And, I mean, frequently asked questions aren't usually *actually* frequently asked questions, right? Most of the time they're questions that you anticipate your audience will have…
Helllllllp—I fell down an etymological rabbit hole after wondering whether the diminutive "-kin" suffix on "pumpkin" meant there was a larger squash known as a "pump." @mashedradishivacheung.com/2016/01/fact-c…
There was not. "Pumpkin" comes from "pumpion" (or "pompion") + "-kin". A pompion is just a regular squash or melon. It comes from the French "pompon."
Whether "pompom" and "pompion" are related is under dispute: some think "pompom" comes from "pomp" (of "…and circumstance" fame). littre.org/definition/pom…
Who else will be at the #YVR community dialogue session on national pharmacare tonight? 🙋🏻
Two years ago I attended the public consultation for federal disability legislation. Even though it took a long-ass time for the Accessible Canada Act to be proposed afterward, the consultation itself was one of the most memorable and edifying events I've ever attended.
That consultation—and the one tonight—never would have happened under the Conservatives. Every day I'm grateful that Harper's not PM anymore. The prospect of being back under the Cons terrifies me, but it's a real possibility 'cause Trudeau didn't follow through on #ERRE.