Thread by @felicitycallard

I'm loving how @OpenUPP2018 is, er, opening things up.

We wrote to everyone who had submitted to/given evidence at JEP.

David Miles responded – see his piece on Test 1 medium.com/ussbriefs/the-… (#USSbriefs36).

@MikeOtsuka read Miles's brief – & disagreed.

#OpenUPP2018

1/

So Mike Otsuka @MikeOtsuka then made a (2nd) submission to JEP engaging w – contesting – Miles.

And then also responded to our invitation from #OpenUPP2018 – see "USS’s Test 1 is not too risky and how Test 2 should be changed" #USSbriefs39 medium.com/ussbriefs/why-…

2/

And you can read the exchange for yourself before the JEP reports. Since #OpenUPP2018 has allowed to be be pulled outside of the closed doors of the JEP.

Opening things up, as we had hoped.

3/

Indeed #OpenUPP2018 has gathered quite a few pieces addressing/critiquing #USS's Test 1.

See also:
#USSbriefs30 (@MikeOtsuka) medium.com/ussbriefs/beyo… & #USSbriefs32 medium.com/ussbriefs/unde…

#USSbriefs32 (@Sam_Marsh101) medium.com/ussbriefs/unde…

4/

But our attempt to open things up has also been stymied. Some doors have remained closed. Some evidence is not possible to see, to read.

We at @OpenUPP2018 will be updating you on that in coming weeks – telling you who responded, what they said, what explanations they gave.

5/

Our invitation to submit to @OpenUPP2018 remains open – we invite all those who want to engage creatively & critically with the JEP’s Terms of Reference to submit to us, whether or not you also submit to JEP.

Drop us a line ussbriefs.com/openupp2018/

6/6 #OpenUPP2018