Amy Siskind is out here blocking black women and deleting their criticism and I have some thoughts.
While no one should be punished for changing, Amy Siskind said some real shit. For years. Before Trump offended her. That is it’s own problem, and one that has to be accepted.
Because in order for this #resistance thing to work out, the power can’t come from converts alone. It has to come from the people who weren’t being heard the entire time. And Amy is sitting right in the middle of a credibility gap.
How can any of us know that she’s operating in good faith? This thread covers her major missteps, but highlights: wanting Sarah Palin to wield national power; attacking Obama on thin grounds; donating to Romney.
Siskind wasn’t just quietly voting GOP or thoughtlessly asking to touch black women’s hair; she was out there actively promoting Sarah “half-term gov” Palin to run the United States government *and* attacking the first black President like he started barbecuing nearby.
That level of Becky-ness cannot merely be stopped; it must be atoned for. And that’s where Siskind is dropping the ball. No one is asking her to grab a time machine and stop herself from demanding the manager. We’re asking her to acknowledge the harm she did.
It’s rough to submit yourself to someone else for atonement. That’s why it’s a fancy sacrament and takes work and people debate its worthiness all the time. Siskind needs to do that hard work, submit to the inspection of black women, and integrate that feedback.
Why does she need to do this? To be a damn decent person for one. But in a practical sense: because black women are the backbone of any meaningful understanding of where our problems started and what it will take to resolve them. And she doesn’t have our trust.
Without us, Siskind’s white privilege will let her get on television and be the face of “resistance,” but it won’t galvanize actual action. It will generate her personal wealth, but it won’t uplift the people she says she’s doing this for.
If you want to add more zeroes to Siskind’s bank account without making a dent in Trumpism, be my guest. But if you think Trump is the manifestation of problems that go way deeper, you’ll want people with the platforms and power of Siskind to apologize and improve.
The fact that Siskind immediately shut down when faced by black women with more credibility is telling on her. The fact that she deleted their criticism is telling on her. The fact that white people are defending her is telling on them.
Watching @FareedZakaria and wondering how anyone can look at Dred Scott and Plessy v Ferguson and see the Court as a protector of democracy.
“Here are five concrete examples of Republicans screwing the country, and then a vague and unsupported assertion that Democrats are doing it too.”
Democrats have never forwarded unfit candidates for the court but over the last thirty years the GOP has nominated Bork, Thomas, Miers and Kavanaugh and has built a whole apparatus to place ideological fellows in lifetime appointments on the judiciary.
People really think that misogyny crossing the political spectrum is a defense of their pointed dislike or burning hatred of Hillary Clinton.
Some people really need to reckon with why they needed to destroy Hillary Clinton so much when the alternative was this.
And yes, I’m still salty about 2 years ago. I watched my country careen off a cliff that had multiple warning signs posted and now the gas tank has exploded.
The Democrats do not have the ability to do anything to Republicans here, and even if they had it would not have mattered because the GOP has the majority and has abandoned their human souls.
I mean literally the ABA is investigating Kavanaugh now. Assault survivors have cornered their representatives. We have no fewer than four lies (motive is easy to prove here) in Kavanaugh’s testimony in front of us. Amy Klobouchar pushed him hard enough that he shouted at her.
This is not a failure of the Democrats to drive the narrative. This is not a failure to expose the evils of the GOP. This is just the GOP not caring. And they don’t have to, because the Senate allows land to vote.
Trump is just Bush on steroids. Obsess over “voter fraud”? Yup (AG scandal). Decimate the truth and block expert investigation to achieve desired ends? Yup (Iraq War). Leave thousands of Americans to die because of their race? YUP.
Frankly, as bad as Trump is he is still not as damaging to the world and America’s reputation as Bush. The rest of the world is also dealing with a slide into fascism now too; what was our excuse in 2000?
Just to be clear, there was enough evidence to preclude a vote on Kavanaugh. Anyone who said yes knew exactly what they were doing.
And don’t act like getting the Senate is equivalent to a Court seat. These people were willing to excuse everything they saw from Kavanaugh and to ignore an unprecedented outcry all because the seat is priceless and anything that forced them to retool would sacrifice it.
There is no way to fix this. Impeachment is a fool’s errand and expanding the court still grants legitimacy to Kavanaugh while severely undermining the new justices. The goal had to be to get them to nominate someone else.
This is not the correct take. The GOP backing down when they already have the majority is likely to demoralize GOP voters. It’s also likely to empower Democratic voters by telling them that pressure does work and they can prevent further assault on institutions.
Democrats win if they lean in and say that Kavanaugh was going nowhere because the Republicans couldn’t rally the votes. Heitkamp can lean on Murkowski and Manchin if the vote fails. Especially if the Republican from MT stays home.
This doesn’t add in the spinelessness of Flake and Collins, sacrificing their reputations for a failed nomination. There is so much material for Dems to rally their base and demoralize the opposition rather than focus on how angry people who support assaulting women will feel.