Read on Twitter
I often hear that the Scrum Master is "responsible for the process". Is that your understanding too?
On an Agile team, using Scrum or whatever other framework or approach, shouldn't it be the Team that owns the process?
#Agile #Scrum #Team
On an Agile team, using Scrum or whatever other framework or approach, shouldn't it be the Team that owns the process?
#Agile #Scrum #Team
If so, why would the SM be the only person responsible? And if they're not, and the whole Team is involved, what is it that makes the role so special?
I'd like to hear your thoughts on that.
#Agile #Scrum #Team
I'd like to hear your thoughts on that.
#Agile #Scrum #Team
My personal view on this - a Scrum Master is supposed to be a change agent. I am there to help everyone change the system of work so that it helps meet their needs.
This goes far beyond the "process" as such, and leads to better overall results.
This goes far beyond the "process" as such, and leads to better overall results.
I find it that the points of leverage on the system aa described by Donnella Meadows are a really helpful in understanding this.
As long as we're only in the "cybernetic leverage" part, the results will be similar to mechanical Scrum. Not far from where the system started.
As long as we're only in the "cybernetic leverage" part, the results will be similar to mechanical Scrum. Not far from where the system started.
So, which points of leverage are you using already? Which can help the system you're working with? What is the system you are working on changing? Is it your Team, your Organization, maybe something else?
@threadreaderapp unroll
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
