But 75% of our Laws are made in Brussels say the Brexiteers. And they call #REMAIN ‘project fear’? Really?
Let’s take a look:
2/ UK Parliament, you know the one…. its the soveriegn Parliament of the United Kingdom that has the ultimate power to make or end any law in the UK. A fundamental piece of our Constitution.
I digress.
3/ UK Parliament passed 945 Acts of Law between 1993 and 2014, of which 231 implemented EU obligations of some sort, according the House of Commons Library.
Over the same period, it passed 33,160 Statutory Instruments
4/ (or secondary legislation) , 4,283 of which implemented EU obligations. Add both of these together and divide by the total number of laws passed, and you get the 13% figure.
5/ So we have to ask ourselves, how did Brexit get to the 75% figure? They are including some rules and regulations set out by the EU that do not apply to the United Kingdom since we have a ‘Special Status’. For example
6/ the EU set some rules related to the Euro currency which don’t apply to us and never will. The EU also produce a number of rules related to Schengen free movement area which do not apply to the UK. The EU set some rules that apply to other areas where the UK is not involved.
7/ When I say the EU set these rules, they are set by duly democratically elected Ministers and MEPs from member countries.
To say that Brexit are misleading the public that 75% of our Laws are made in Brussels is an understatement!
Check the facts folks. Always check the facts
8/ Brexiteers say that the EU refuses to reform and there is too much red tape for UK businesses and we should vote to leave. Do you remember when the EU stopped reforming? Nope. Me Neither.
9/ Between 2005 and 2013 the EU repealed over 5,590 different legal acts, which translated into a cut of 26% in red tape for businesses. Nice set of reforms there eh! See the link at the bottom of thread for details.
10/ he EU undergoes constant reform, just like Westminster Parliament….. no Parliament in the world stands still – they continually propose new rules and regulations that are more suitable for the times and they repeal laws and regulations that are out of date or at least some
11/ Do we really need to have a Law in the UK that says It is still an offence to beat or shake any carpet rug or mat in any street in the Metropolitan Police District, although you are allowed to shake a doormat before 8am?
12/ Strangely, this law is still in place under the Metropolitan Police Act 1839, section 60 and for other districts; Town Police Clauses Act 1847, section 28. The following five laws were also initiated by the same section 28 and are still in force.
13/ It is illegal to keep a pigsty in front of your house (Unless duly hidden).
It is illegal to erect a washing line across any street.
It is illegal to sing any profane or obscene song or ballad in any street.
14/ It is illegal to wilfully and wantonly disturb people by ringing their doorbells or knocking at their doors – Even if it has a cute name like Ding Dong Ditch, Knock Knocky or Ring and Run.
15/ It is illegal to order or permit any servant to stand on the sill of any window to clean or paint it.
At lease the European Union is repealing some of the daft stuff.
Breaking news: EU to offer UK the best trade deal so far post Brexit. Who was expecting that? Well I was for one.... the problem has always been with the timing. It'll take years to agree on the terms of any new trade agreement because the UK wants to diverge it's regulations
2/ away from those of the Single Market. And there is only a SINGLE market not cherry picked pieces. This is going to be the stumbling block for signing. FTAs usually require convergence of rules not divergence. DUP and UUP have been in Brussels today with their red lines.
3/ which means that an orderly Withdrawal cannot be agreed and UK leaves on 29/3/19. No WA=No Transition and a cliff edge Brexit that no-one in their right mind voted for. i.e. catastrophe for UK. When TM the PM comes back from Brussels next week she will be forced to present
"Why should the UK have to pay more than other EU countries to support the new members states in the Balkans etc? UK is largest net contributor to EU!" Another shouty piece from the Brexit camp. Another LIE and they call us Remainians 'scaremongers'. LOL
2/ How much *do* the UK pay compared to other EU members? Lets take a look:
The United Kingdom pay far less than most members of the EU. Now who woulda thunk that?
3/ The fact is that in cash terms of contributions per capita of population the UK is ranked 26th of ALL EU member states at around EUR105.12 per person. Only Croatia pays less per person in contributions.
The problem we have in UK is that if UK leaves with no Withdrawal Agreement then the EU are bound not only by the Treaty of the EU and the Treaty for the Functioning of the EU but dozens of other international treaties with other countries too.
2/ If the EU break the rules to help out the UK then they'll find themselves in court in the Hague, in dispute at the WTO and potentially sued by other Governments via the World Bank...
3/ The EU economy last year was €15.3 trillion. If they are forced by the UK to lose a few billion as a result of Brexit then that's what they will do.
Not out of choice or to punish the UK for leaving but as a result of international law.
The LANGUAGE of Brexit on borders; EU said none "on the island", UK said none "on the border". Irish officials talk about multi dimensional border issues; constitutional, cultural, psychological, societal,historical - UK talk about tariffs, duties and customs and political games.
We had been in country for less than 20 minutes before a former member of the Ulster Defence Regiment explained that if we wanted an AK47 then we were that moment driving through the best place to get one... easily accessed.
Herein lays the issue. If you have customs officers checking paperwork of the 45 million truck crossings a year between North and South then they'll need police protection. The police will need army protection ...
Back in 2016 I asked the question about ISDS when discussing TTIP and whether foreign companies who had invested over a trillion pounds of FDI in the UK might have the right to sue UK Gov for Brexit compensation.
2/ Its taken a while but from a legal standpoint they might have a legal basis for their claims. FDI to the UK is roughly £400 billion from EU27 firms, £300 billion from USA and another £300bn or so from Japan and rest of world...
3/ @everycountry picked this up in Geneva. The article below in legalese from July this year highlights why this may now be true. Even if UK Government wins their defence the cost of all this court time is going to have an impact.
It's definitely time for bed. It's 9 minutes away from 24 hours since i got home from the Bath for Europe event last night and here I am in southern Spain getting ready for bed.. /1
on the rooftop of the penthouse apartment given to #3blokesinapub for our stay here.... (not quite given but cheaper than an air BnB thanks to the amazing support from the fine folk in this part of the world that also think Brexit is a catastrophic idea). /2
@everycountry and I have had some REALLY interesting meetings today in Gibraltar with some exceedingly high level contacts and finished the evening with the fine folk from Brexpats in Spain... 2 more episodes of #3blokes in the can and coming soon! /3