You know, I did not expect to get an #Alfie in 2016, even if they were awarded, and even if I was the first alternate position off the ballot, because it was just so obvious to me that the work people were nominating me for only existed in response to the Sad/Rabid Puppies.
So I didn't feel like I'd been robbed of anything that their efforts kept me off the ballot; if they didn't exist, I'd have been nowhere near it in the first place.
So I was completely unprepared when I got called up to the stage. I think I went on the wrong way; I know I walked off the wrong way. I misplaced the trophy back stage and was too embarrassed to tell anyone (it was found and returned to me.)
I did not feel cheated to be kept off the Hugo ballot but I was honored as all get out to be handed an Alfie.
And it just underscored how small the mindset behind the puppy campaigns was. I've watched friends get eaten up inside as their two years of eligibility for the Campbell award ticked away, or as their best work isn't noticed in its publication year...
The idea that you could launch a multiyear vendetta because you were *nominated* for the Campbell, you made the shortlist of authors out of all the debut authors in your years, you were singled out and your name is now part of sci-fi/fantasy history, but you didn't win?
I like to joke about "rewards mean more when they come from your peers" because, you know, @GRRMspeaking handed it to me, but he was just acting on the ballot data, which reflected that the community *did* think of me, and that really does mean the world.
And I know I said that are the time on my blog but it just wells up in me again every award season. If I am never closer to the Hugo ballot than I was that year I will still remain equal parts flattered and honored by that communal gesture.
(That's not going to stop me from trying.)
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
So, electric kettles. Let me see if I can't convert some other white US-born people over.
Here are some reasons:
1. You can set specific temperatures, not just heat things to a boil. Get closer to the ideal temperature for your tea, spend less time waiting for it to cool.
2. If you need boiling water to pour into or over something, not just like a single serving for instant whatever, you've got it in a nice kettle with a spout and an insulated handle.
3. You never have that thing where surface tension has stopped the water from actually boiling even though it's at temperature, and when you move it and disturb the water it explodes all over your hand (Google it, if you don't know this thing.)
Twitter's specific policy on Dehumanizing Speech is better than I had feared; it's more specific, covering only comparisons to animals (vermin, pests) or tools for a specific purpose. You can give feedback here. Mine focused on implementation. blog.twitter.com/official/en_us…
The Dehumanizing Speech policy being specific is important because if (let's dream big here) it is enforced as written, you can avoid getting suspended for talking about TERFs by saying their beliefs are garbage or their actions are garbage.
My feedback focused on the unequal way in which Twitter's existing policies have been supported. White guys making clear references to genocide, murder, stalking children, etc., get "We have to look at context, this was clearly not serious" replies while their victims get banned.
For the record, I do hope Brett Kavanaugh's life is ruined. I hope his marriage has been irreparably strained. I hope his social life is in the toilet. I hope he feels no joy at his win. I hope he only stops waiting for the other shoe to fall when it does, like a guillotine blade
My ~*preference*~ would be that he suffer some sort of institutional consequences, even if it was merely not being confirmed to a lifetime position on the highest court in the land, where he will have power over millions.
But the right decided that's off the table.
I hope anyone who comes before the SCOTUS who is even tangentially liberal, left, or Democratic makes an issue out of his participation in the case so that he has to spend his whole career justifying and defending his presence on the bench.
Well, @RadioFreeTom thinks saying "No problem." implies there's a problem so forgive me if I'm not crowning him a king of situational analysis. What he's calling Trump's "rhetorical excess" is largely projection. The idea that we win by *not* pointing out what they're doing...
...just gives Trump and his party the full benefit of that projection, in that they get to smear their opponents while being insulated from accurate accusations. We've been ceding control of the narrative to them for decades now and it hasn't worked.
The reason @RadioFreeTom wants the Democrats to settle down and be good little children is because up until two hours ago HE WAS A REPUBLICAN and when this is all done he hopes there's a slightly more couth and presentable version of the Republican Party that's still in charge.
We've got GOP voters talking about drinking liberal tears with their beers, we've got a GOP president lying his backside off to his rally and then telling Jeanine Pirro he wants to hold women "liable" for talking about rapes... I don't see the centrists asking them to be civil?
Isn't it weird how absolutely no pundit wrote an editorial saying that Lindsey Graham's fire and brimstone sermon isn't going to win over the middle? Isn't it strange that no one tells Chuck Grassley that his angry interruptions are going to hurt his party?
There was a lot of talk about whether or not Kavanaugh's vitriolic testimony would hurt him but I didn't see a lot of neutral or centrist-identified people saying that it *should*.
So let me tell you another reason we need to not back down, not sit down, not be quiet: coward that he is, Donald Trump is at his most dangerous when he feels like he's on top of the world.
The horse race headlines are saying that Donald Trump had his best day as president, and I'm sure he felt it. He just came through a knock-down, drag-out fight and won a battle that people had been telling him to drop for weeks, so right now no one can tell him anything.
If he gets it in his head that maybe he should fire Rosenstein? No one's going to be able to talk him out of it. He might even do it just to extend the high, or see how far he can take it.