Have any of you ever gone to the "analytics" section of Twitter and looked at the socioeconomic profile of your followers? (I suppose probably all of you have and as usual I was the last person on earth to realize this was even possible.)
I was surprised: Why do I exhibit such a fascination over people who are interested in the weather? Or is it that everyone is interested, above all, in the weather, so everyone finds that this is the top-ranked category? What happens when you ask?
And why would my followers be so heavily weighted toward people interested in science, tech, space, astronomy, and our national parks? I mean, I guess I'm interested in all those things, but don't really talk about them that much, do I?
About 64% of you are married and 44% single--that sounds about right. And 39% of you are in "professional/technical" professions, which could mean almost anything. But no surprises there.
But I *was* surprised, and I suppose flattered, that my followers have a striking preference for "premium brands." I suppose that means I should market myself as "Claire Berlinski, Exclusive Premium Edition."
A lot of you are homeowners: 79 percent. (Why are you sharing this data? How does Twitter know this?) And one thing really jumps out: You're wealthy. Insanely wealthy. It would seem I haven't got a single follower who isn't loaded. Remember: global per capita GDP is USD $17,300.
So I don't feel at all bad reminding you that I'm raising money to finish writing this book, and I'm *so close* to the goal: I could even reach it today if all of my followers put in a dollar. gofundme.com/braveoldworld. I would be so grateful for it--I so much want to finish it.
I also feel confident that given the principle of marginal utility, those of you in those upper-income brackets, particularly, won't get as much utility out of that money as I will. You have no idea how far I can stretch 20 bucks--and how much of a difference it would make to me.
Here's where you live, but do you notice the strange thing I do? Those numbers don't add up to 100 percent. What do you conclude from that? Perhaps that I have a lot of followers who are careful about sharing personal data with Twitter? What happens when you ask?
Unsurprisingly, most of you are Anglophones. A large minority are Turkish speakers. But only a tiny number of you are Francophones, qui me surprend: peut-être c'est car l'usage de Twitter reste l’apanage d’une minorité des français?
Does anyone know what the difference is between my followers and my "organic audience?" Are the latter carbon-based and the former bots? Anyway, it mostly makes sense, but I'd expect to see more in France and fewer in Nigeria. Kóyo, my Nigerian friends! Sannu! Kedu! Bawo ni!
My followers' most significant consumer goods purchase is yogurt. No, I don't get it either. And for some reason, 41% of my followers are purchasers of "oral care," by which I assume they mean things like toothpaste, not--well, I'm sure it's things like toothpaste.
I don't know why they've taken such care to furnish me with statistics about what kind of after-market auto buyer you are, given that I'm not selling car parts, don't have a car, and never talk about cars, but they have. I wonder why?
But here's the strangest finding. What on earth do you make of this? This is the only statistic they *won't* allow me to compare to "All Twitter users." Is this because Twitter is male-dominated, generally, and they don't want people to know that?
Or is it because men are more likely to be interested in science, tech, space, astronomy, and our national parks, and more likely to eat yogurt--and mistakenly think that I am, too? I'd be curious to know what those stats look like for you, whether you're male or female.
How can I make the Claire Berlinski brand more appealing to women, I wonder? It's hard to look at that without concluding, "Women don't like me." But that's weird, because (I think) in real life, they do.
Anyway, now that I've discovered this, I'll work much harder to please my followers. The weather in Paris is 55 degrees--that's 13 degrees for those of you in Turkey, France, India, and Nigeria. Sunny with a gentle breeze. 68 percent humidity--
with no precipitation expected today, light winds from the north north east, and excellent visibility. It will be a lovely day, @GCharing, @purpleliz2, and @esi_zey! It should be quite warm by mid-afternoon--24 degrees C (75 F), so dress lightly.
La persistance de conditions anticycloniques sur le nord de l’Europe permet de nous protéger de toute perturbation. En l’occurrence, le ciel reste bien dégagé sur l’Ile-de-France ce dimanche, et le temps s’annonce très agréable.
For more information about the weather in Paris, I recommend this site: meteo-paris.com/ile-de-france/… For my Nigerian followers, it looks like a warm (34) but cloudy day today, with perhaps a shower or thunderstorm.
I really do recommend France to all of my yogurt-loving followers. It's unquestionably the world capital of yogurt. tastecooking.com/the-exceptiona… Not just cow-yogurt, either: Here we have goat yogurt, sheep yogurt, soy yogurt--if you can milk it, we've got it.
And since now I know you're especially interested in premium brands, let me commend to your attention the best of the best of all yogurts: Michel Augustin. . You will never settle for a lesser yogurt again.
(J'ai fait cette pub gratuitement, @MichelAugustin1, mais je serais ravie de discuter votre yaourt tous les jours de la semaine pour un petit émolument. Selon Twitter, les gens qui me suivent ont pleine de fric et s'intéresse aux produits haut de gamme--surtout, le yaourt.)
What do your Twitter analytics tell you about your followers? Now that I know so much more about you, I'll keep urging you to chip in to my PREMIUM BRAND book, which in addition to many other things, will mention the #weather and #yogurt. gofundme.com/braveoldworld
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
His body was *dismembered?* It's nyti.ms/2Cv2Ys6 Perhaps it's best to wait to report that detail until we see forensic reports? The Turkish government is very capable, forensically--I've seen it in action. (Not least when my apartment was burgled).
If it's got a piece, or pieces, of a body, it will be very capable of figuring out to whom it belonged based on DNA evidence. There will be enough security footage to say without doubt not only whether he left the consulate--
--but where he went, if he was in one piece. And probably where the pieces went, if he was not. I can't see any way to smuggle a human body out of there without a forensic trace. The hypothesis that he left the consulate in pieces sounds like one worth investigating--
Hollywood perpetrated the fantasy, sure, but that's Hollywood's job. The real culprit here is the federal government. The use of the polygraph to screen employees gives it a luster of official credibility. People insist they don't trust the federal government, but they do.
If authority figures use this thing, they figure, it must work. And the government uses it because it *does* work: It works to scare people senseless and extract confessions. That's presumably why Kavanaugh declared it was a useful tool of law enforcement. In that sense, it is.
But he's learned well why the government needs to think *very* carefully about promulgating fiction, however useful it may be and however noble the end. I don't believe the government should never lie. Of course there are circumstances under which it should and must.
Yes, it's a good article. It's bizarre that we're even having this discussion, though. It's worth asking why Americans believe in polygraphs (no one else does, it's a uniquely American superstition). It has something to do with two cultural proclivities, I think.
First is the idea that everything can be done with technology. We worship "science," especially if we don't know much about it. "Science" can do and fix everything, to the point we people are willing to believe it can do the obviously impossible:
"Science" can tell us, definitively, what evil lurks in the hearts of men.
I suspect too that the less one knows about the hearts of men--particularly, that human personalities and emotions are tremendously complex and hard to understand--
If we're going to go out like this, let's do it with style. Let's be *the* most spectacularly entertaining and degenerate empire in history.
Let's build ourselves a proper coliseum. We stick Graham, Kavanaugh, a passel of shrieking harpies and Ronan Farrow right into it.
We go full-on ludi circenses. They have maim or trap their opponents--not kill them quickly--because the fight has to last long enough to please the crowd.
(We're the crowd.)
We get bored if it's not bloodier and more twisted than the last game.
But what's so wrong with our political life that "six current and former senior national security officials" would leak information about an ongoing, Top Secret investigation? Do the American people need to know about this so urgently that everyone in China needs to know, too?
Why did these officials imagine the investigation was labelled "Top Secret?"
Why are we hearing about this from people not authorized to go on the record?
If this is classified "Top Secret" for a good reason, it should stay that way. If it isn't, why can't these officials tell us openly, using their names?
Is there a dispute in the intelligence community about whether this should be public? If so, why?
You Idiot Reporters Are Making It Worse nationalreview.com/2018/10/kavana… Yep. An in doing so, contributing every bit as much as Trump to the destruction of precious norms of civility--ones so much easier to destroy than rebuild. Everyone--stop.
Your partisan hysteria, your preening self-righteousness, your eagerness, in every case, to view half of your fellow Americans as enemies to be destroyed, as opposed to than people with whom you're forever stuck on this continent--so you'd best learn to live with them---
--is killing our country. No melodrama in that, just a fact. Something called "America" will survive, but it won't be the free, self-confident, optimistic country we were given, it will be an irrelevant, shattered shell. You wouldn't want to kill our country---