A REALLY strong sign that your “scientific” article is total hokum:
When folks raise legit questions about your obviously flawed methodology and specious conclusions, you respond by calling them whores and perverts and can’t defend your *actual* work.
#ROGD
When folks raise legit questions about your obviously flawed methodology and specious conclusions, you respond by calling them whores and perverts and can’t defend your *actual* work.
#ROGD
I’ve presented at a number major professional conferences in multiple disciplines, and I’m a peer-reviewer for several journals. I can honestly say that I’ve never had someone try to defend work I criticized by calling me a slut. 🤷🏻♀️
I’ll be totally honest, the #ROGD “study” is something that I’d probably hand to undergrads that I’m trying to teach how to critique published research. The errors in both method and in analysis are egregious enough that I’d expect a college sophomore to pick them out.
I find it DEEPLY ironic that people are screaming about “academic freedom” over Brown’s decision not to promote this article, while its proponents actively harassing multiple trans women for merely pointing out important flaws in its methodology.
If you find my thoughts valuable, tips are always welcome: ko-fi.com/maribrighe
Or support me on Patreon (link in pinned tweet).
Or support me on Patreon (link in pinned tweet).
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
