Sessions is the Attorney General of the United States, but he thinks "good lawyers" doing their jobs are somehow an affront to the rule of law.
Only if you define the law as requiring deportation, Jeff. The AG of the US should know better. Much better.
According to Jeff, accountants who tell their clients to take a lawful tax deduction, or defense lawyers who win acquittals are also shameful "water seepers."
Apparently, Jeff's notion of good lawyering has been colored by the likes of Michael Cohen and Rudy Giuliani.
Next he says the DOJ defends immigrant rights. But Jeff has done nothing but follow the advice of white nationalist sympathizing hate groups like @FAIRImmigration, @CIS_org and @NumbersUSA.
And he says deceit is never rewarded. Have you disclosed YOUR ties to these orgs, Jeff?
But that's not the biggest problem. It's that Jeff was addressing his employees - immigration judges.
That's right. Jeff Sessions signs the paychecks of the judges deciding deportation cases. Does this sound like a stacked deck? You bet it does.
Let me make it clear.
The Attorney General is telling immigration judges how to decide cases.
This is not judicial. We need ALL immigration courts to be reorganized under Article I of the US Constitution.
Jeff thinks lawyers doing their job is improper. No, Jeff - what's improper is your influence on judges who are supposed to be deciding cases based on things like facts, evidence, and the rule of law.
Jeff, ALL your decisions will be challenged in federal court. All of them.
We are keenly aware of your cowardly attempts to change the law to fit your well-documented white nationalist views. You are an anachronism, a relic of a bygone era. Take heart that when Congress flips, it will be not insubstantially your fault. #FlipTheHouse
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
@FAIRImmigration, founded by Dr. John Tanton, is a mouthpiece of white nationalist rhetoric. But it's more than that: it injects its foul ideology into actual policy.
One (latest) example: Temporary Protected Status, or TPS. Read what a federal judge found:
On p29 of the decision, the Court gives yet another example of Acting Secy Elaine Duke, who is supposed to make a dispassionate assessment of conditions on the ground in determining TPS eligibility, said "this conclusion [to end TPS] is the result of an America first view..."
Curious, because America was founded on ideals of welcoming the forcibly displaced. I'm not sure what "American first" has to do with terminating TPS.
If the White House is influencing the decision, we have a problem, because the White House has made A LOT of racist statements.
Feeling drained after the #KavanaughHearings? I've been thinking about why. Objectively, there are far worse injustices going on even as Kavanaugh spoke.
Sure, there's the out of sight out of mind factor. Most injustice goes unreported; yesterday's hearing was not that.
But there was something distinctive about the hearing. It was a rare exposure of several different vectors of underreported injustice, concentrated into one episode.
We hear stories of sexual assault all the time. Or oppression. Abuser protection. Entitlement. Privilege. Character assassination. Lip service to the oppressed. Trauma. Legalized discrimination.
Rarely do we get to see it all in one day, before hundreds of millions of people
This administration continues to target aspiring American communities, one by one. DACA revocation, TPS de-designation, changing asylum laws, the Muslim Ban...
Once again, the administration regurgitates rhetoric spewed by nativists, and with H-4 work permit revocation, they get an added "bonus" - getting to undo something Obama put in place. Yes, this is what they base their policies on.
But I also wanted to say something about the new public charge rule that greatly expands ineligibility grounds for green cards, which will also play into this attack on the Indian-American community.
This is an attempt to backdoor the RAISE Act into law.
Well this is curious. Apparently @FAIRImmigration believes I am a paid operative of "state-owned propaganda outlet" @ajplus to meddle in 2018 midterm elections.
Why? For this video I did calling FAIR out as driven by white nationalism:
They accuse me of "spreading malicious disinformation in what is a clear attempt to influence the upcoming midterm election." I'm flattered they think so highly of me.
Entirely different, of course, from FAIR's statements influencing lawmakers here:
More effective than any physical barrier on the southern border. Keeps people out before they can even begin their journey.
You can't fly over it or tunnel underneath it. You can't sneak around it, either. And it's much, much harder to tear down.
It's the combined bureaucracy of several different agencies that keeps people out. Physical barriers are a small slice of the pie of exclusion.
But with due process, there is sometimes a way through. Perfectly legal, not unlike carving out a nice little door for yourself.
Today, a green card for our North African client was approved after a 4 year delay. He had been apart from his US citizen wife since 2013, and even though they followed the law to the T, repeatedly told they just needed "one more thing," the visa remained stuck.