Day 2 of #RTC18. Hearing @MaaSScotland talking about #MaaS. But how does that tie with rural areas that have no connectivity? At least they are trialling it.
By the way, it's a cracking mix at #RTC18. Spoken to technologists, policy makers, activists, voluntary groups, and concerned locals. And that was just at lunch yesterday. Great event @ScotRuralAction
And here I am presenting yesterday. Using memes. Because explaining data sharing and #MaaS can only be done using internetzes. #RTC18
@CTAUK1 makes a crucial point. What often makes or breaks services is personal assistance, even from vehicle to door. You can't replace that with tech, yet. #RTC18
But tech can help the sector. Particularly open source tech that can help with coordination with highly-utilised vehicles like CT vehicles. #rtc18
A presenter made the point that we shouldn't invest in public transport that doesn't work. We should invest in public transport in its widest sense, e.g. lift sharing. I agree completely. #RTC18
Now Maggie Lawson makes a very important point on personalisation. What future mobility advocates promote is personalisation at scale. True personalisation needs people, effort, and money. CT does that well. #RTC18
Now in a session on young people and transport. And there are young people here. Key messages: cost and accessibility important, but importantly get them involved. Show you give a damn about them. Word. #RTC18
Now Jane who is leading @RYP2018 is talking about how housing, jobs, and transport form a trio of woes that work together to make it hard for young people to build a life. All not easy to tackle. #RTC18
Finally, talking community innovation. For me, it’s learning how it’s done to be honest #RTC19
Now the day being rounded off with a run through of #NTS2 by @TransportScot. Hopefully what was talked about here at #RTC18 will inform it
And that’s it. A cracking couple of days, that I will blog on later this week. Thanks to @ScotRuralAction and @weeyinontour for organising this, and particularly the latter for brilliantly MCing. See you again in 2 years?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Today in Copenhagen got me thinking about this picture (h/t @StreetsblogUSA). Many of my sustainable transport advocates show this as a way of highlighting buses and trains can be better integrated. Done very well in Copenhagen.
The reaction from many of my rail fellows is usually one of horror. How can we allow this on trains? Think of the passengers. Both sides, however, miss a fundamental point.
This increases capacity for sustainable transport trips.
The obvious one is the available capacity for passengers on the train. In the times I have used the Copenhagen rail system, I have, at most, seen one bike parked there. The rest is taken up with people seated or standing.
Attended my first startup pitch evening for a while, for startups working with a major bus operator. The sense from the audience (mainly bus people) reaction was impressed with anything with AI and Big Data, less so with stuff that helps with the basics.
A cleaning startup was practically mocked. A software that enabled better route scheduling had glazed looks, and a demand responsive coach service got the cold shoulder until they pitched their growth statistics. And the business they were nicking off the bus operators.
All of the pitches were actually pretty good, and have a clear problem definition and strategy to solve it. Personally I loved the school run taxi service and a service that basically took the data the operators have and made it useful.
I am in two minds on this whole algorithm debate. What doesn't help is the hysteria on one side, and a dismissive "trust us" attitude on the other. theguardian.com/commentisfree/…
On one hand, yes they could have hugely negative consequences. Ones that should be understood and people held account for. Especially in public services.
On the other, if the algorithm makes better decisions than humans 99% of the time, shouldn't we just do it? Then arguments focus on the outcome, not the process. And if we studied every possible outcome before delivering, nothing would get done.
Finally got to watch Avengers: Infinity War this morning. It’s one of the most overrated films I have ever seen. Sorry Marvel fans, you know it’s true.
It’s not even a bad film. It’s pretty decent in fact. But the way people were talking about it was like a cinematic masterpiece. It ain’t. It’s far too convoluted for that.
Firstly, pick a plot for God’s sake. 30 seconds on one, fight. 30 seconds on another, cut scene. Great if you have an attention span that long, not so good otherwise.
The number of decision makers who know sod all about fishing, especially those who were on the Fishing Committee of the EU, astounds me. From my uncle who was a fisherman, here are a few facts.
Fishing is dying because of EU quotas. No fishing is dying because fish stocks have crashed, and these quotas have stopped them being obliterated. It’s a bit hard to fish when there are no fish.
Not to mention these quotas and the boats were sold off by the British fishing industry. Your average skipper on a trawler got shafted because companies got greedy. But nope, blame the EU. It’s easier.
I both agree and disagree with this. Mainly because work and leisure time is becoming increasingly blended for many. bbc.co.uk/news/amp/educa…
That's not necessarily because you are being forced to work all the time (though that's a part of it), but because time is being taken off during the week (often for good reason) then it can be made up for in leisure time.
Personally, having set hours a week and having choice as to when you work them would be ideal. Too often flexitime is stipulated on you being in the office every day.