No person credibly accused of violating another's rights should EVER be placed or retained in a position of power over them, as it is an implicit violation of fiduciary duty.
Ms. Ford's story didn't come out until now because the GOP is about to violate her rights unless👇🏽
Ms. Ford's story didn't come out until now because the GOP is skirting the principles and established rules and practices as intended by our forefathers to get a tainted justice in place - and for a dark reason.
The GOP is barreling ahead so they can avoid removing Trump, which - if he goes - will lead them to be faced with the release of data Russian agents obtained from the #SMARtech breach.
The release of information about what really happened in the 2016 election alone will be enough to kill the GOP... but add in the 2004 election and strategically enabling & elevating serial child predators because they're easy to control...
and it's going to lead to a nationwide disruption in train service... because
👇🏽👇🏽👇🏽👇🏽
[ they're all going to get run out of town on a rail with Donnie ]
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Interesting. It's just gotta be a coincidence that Psy-Group's friends and targets of politically-motivated catfishing of Never-Trump GOP operatives both Rilly, Rilly love the Mandarin Oriental in DC....
if @VickerySec or others were to look at the timing of spikes in communications with breaches of other state election boards (or other corporate, political, or government entities holding data that could be used to improve triangulation with the facebook data already breached)...
Note: the article states that the pledges were made just after DCLeaks started releasing emails from the DNC - but neglects to mention 7 emails between Smith and IL RNC Committeeman Richard Porter also leaked.
Couldn't the tip have come from another House where they felt it necessary to get that information out,
because the real value of the Kavanaugh nomination was to yield a counterpoint against which to cast future allegations of sexual assault against teenage girls?
Another instance for the head of that house to point to and say 'see, the American public really doesn't care about past transgressions against women?'