Promotion on almost the lowest budget in League Two & thriving in League One on definitely the lowest budget, a look at #ASFC finances after the club gave us open access to it's finances. Club has matchday income of less than £2m a year which works out at less than £300 per fan.
League 2 clubs are given relative crumbs in terms of broadcasting money, & thanks to the way the 'Big Six' of MUFC MCFC Arsenal LFC CFC & THFC have sneaked through changes to the distribution method, will earn less from 2019
#ASFC earned just over £1/2m from commercial & other income in 2017/18, mainly from sponsorship via owner @AndyhHolt's WhatMore group. This is a way of owner supporting club without pumping it full of debt.
Total income of #ASFC for 2017/17 was £2.6 million, which is less than the avearge cost of employing a single Premier League footballer.
Total wage bill for all 84 employees of ASFC was £2.1 million. Club dependent on owner support, sale of players and an occasional good cup draw to be able to pay the bills. Wages worked out as £83 for every £100 of income last season due to so many win bonuses
Sale of players such as Matty Pearson & Kayden Jackson essential to help a small club such as ASFC turn losses into breaking even. Most clubs in League 2 who don't manage a player sale will end up with a loss.
After the open access we were given and the Twitter spat between @AndyhHolt & '@GNev2 this summer over the sums being paid by Salford City in wages, we are hoping that Gary will give us access to Salford's finances as a sign of open governance & transparency.
We were give unparalleled access to the figures even as far down to how much it costs to hire the portable toilets as well as budget for next season & all questions were answered. If all clubs took a no secrets approach such as ASFC there would be fewer dud owners.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
One cunning item not mentioned by the #EPL in changing the distibution of overseas TV rights is the impact on lower league clubs. Previously they've had a % of the equal share but not the merit share of PL TV income. Under proposals some overseas TV income becomes merit (1/2)
This means any increase in overseas rights will result in clubs in Championship, League 1 and League 2 getting nothing and it is all kept by the PL clubs. For a club such as Accrington in L1 a £1bn annual increase in overseas would have meant an extra £473k a year. now it is FA
So when John Henry talks about being unhappy at Liverpool 'subsidising' other clubs, he means that all 20 PL clubs want share a £1,000,000,000 pa increase so likes of Preston, Stanley, Morecambe etc. do not receive anything. After all, £473,000 out of a billion is a lot isn't it?
#NUFC loss of £90.9m confirmed before gains on player sales for Sissoko, Wijnaldum etc reduced that by £42.2m
Cash flows from player trading (as some deals on credit) show net cash cost of £11.1m in 2016/17 for 2016/17. Net borrowings from Mike Ashley/MASH Holdings £15m
#NUFC matchday income down 10% despite higher attendances & more matches in #Championship due to lower ticket prices & prawn sandwich sales. Commercial income halved due to loss of #EPL central commercial deals & TV down 35%