There is a term for people who take culture usually from oppressed people without permission, cultural appropriation, but we need a term for when members of oppressed group are eager to give their culture away to other groups to exploit.
Tons of blue checks including a Britney Packyetti, Deray’s TFA buddy from the Ferguson protests, and Reign of April, from Oscars so White fame
This is how all these negroes caping for this white woman in @DjChubbESwagg’s mentions look right now
I also suspect she’s one of those white liberals that they’ve befreinded and who can give many of them work down the line so they need to stay ingratiated?
Yes my guess is hip hop is to them mainly a straight black male enterprise and is therefore inherently problematic anyway and can use a white woman’s touch. If it was a white man curating a black feminism exhibit they’d lose it no matter his credentials
I’m not saying this woman needs to lose her job or that she’s not qualified. Just that it’s a valid question to ask and to have all these prominent black ppl who love to ask similar questions in other instances now turn into rabid bulldogs on her behalf is such a bad look
Oh geez so first all these black people snitched and tattled on him by tagging her on twitter and demanding he speak to her (why?) then he ended up giving in 😞
I personally don’t care that much because I don’t put much weight on that museum. Their first speaker to host an event there, i think opening day, was Luvvie, and the first movie they showed there was Loving, about an interracial relationship. Here’s their reasoning
Putting aside the fact that of all the possible black movies in the history of film they could have chosen as their first film, they chose one written and directed and produced by white people about interracial relationships as being representative of their mission...
...the choice of that movie was problematic for a bunch of other reasons, as it was a kind of shady story in real life as I describe in this thread
As for why Luvvie is a problematic choice for being the inaugural speaker at an African-American museum, listen to the podcast we did about her here soundcloud.com/champagneshark…
Something else notable about the African-American museum choosing Loving as its first movie on the grounds that it’s “symbolic of the mission of the museum”....it’s a movie that centers a white man and excludes black men from the main narrative. That’s symbolic of your mission?
That’s why to me the question should shift from the hiring of this woman to asking a macro question about whether this museum is even primarily for black people and if not, who? How much of an honor should we deem it to be selected by them given what they’ve displayed so far?
To sum up, I’m not upset with museum because this is unfortunately consistent with what they do + their mission. I’m more disappointed in these black people w/platforms rabidly attacking a black man on her behalf just for asking perfectly valid questions they often ask themselves
These people have so many followers while the guy they’re siccing their followers on has like 6K. All for a highly successful white woman whose livelihood is in *no danger*. He wasn’t getting her fired in a million years.
What’s interesting tho is she didn’t even have to tweet a single word in her own defense for him to get badgered into apologizing. The black ppl did it for her. The most she had to do was thank them for their service
“Tag her!”
“Have a conversation with her!”
“Let her explain her credentials to you and school you”
“Wait, you expect missus to take time out of her busy day to talk to you? How dare you!”
WTF?
Apparently these are the shirts that Kid Noble guy sells? amazing
So one of the employees of the museum tweeted this. This is what I mean by “get the bag and fuck everyone else” culture that infects woke spaces. Just the idea she thought this was okay to tweet
Soon as I saw this title especially based on the timing and the source, I knew it was going to be a takedown of Donald Glover 🤨 theroot.com/dear-black-mal…
Another piece about black men, this time black nerds, in two weeks that compares them to potential Eliot Rodgers in the making. Also brings up homophobia for good measure
Issa Rae 3 years ago didn’t just state a preference but denigrated a whole group of black men to do so and the none of these black writers including at the Root held her to task for that, downplayed it. Glover *didnt* denigrate a group of black women tho and they pretend he did
I wish y’all would make up your mind on whether Donald Glover needs canceling or whether you want to bask in his reflected glory on the #blackexcellence tip. This dance has been going on for years now. I think pendulum swung back toward canceling as revenge for Issa Ra kerfuffle
A lot of the Blavity and #blackexcellence crowd moved past Donald Glover’s past when he was getting writeups in prestige media and his show was winning major awards and he was helping with representation in nerd stuff like Star Wars, the most important causes to them
Now a week after these people were all mad at people getting mad at Issa Rae, now they see Glover have one of his best weeks ever and they’re suddenly trying to cancel him again. It seems like tit for tat. The problem is the disingenuous excuses they gave for Issa apply here too
This documentary about Basquiat is a good lens through which to understand Kanye. He had that same intense hunger for fame and admiration to rub elbows with rich white elites Kanye had and same frustrations when he couldn’t get it
There is a class of rappers obsessed with Basquiat but who are not generally into art or talk about art otherwise. So what is it about Basquiat they like so much? It’s that he’s ultimate symbol of a black nobody rising up to be celebrated by white fashion and art elites
To these people whether they admit it to themselves or not, Basquiat’s real art was getting celebrated by white celebrities and tastemakers and getting access to exotic strange. His lifestyle was his art in their eyes and what inspires them
This is a new low. In one of the latest Issa Rae defense pieces, again, instead of discussing the actual complaints they took one of the guys who tweeted innocuous criticism and used it to spin off an argument about black men being like potential incel mass shooters
It’s cool if they want to defend Issa Rae’s chapter, the discourse is good, but why in such a tacky bad faith way all the time?
She is being paid by white people to write for a huge publication that people of all races read and what does she do with that platform. Traffic in awful stereotypes about black men and “educate” the good white folk on how they are ticking time bombs, the next Elliot Rodgers
The best proof that regular black people dont really read Issa Rae’s book is how long it took for this excerpt to go viral. Everyone seems to be discovering it today
For people asking if it’s real, you can read it for yourself in the book preview pages on Amazon, under the Black Women Asian Men chapter amazon.com/Misadventures-…
If you want to know why I'm not surprised by this, listen to our podcast episode on Issa Rae that was previously subscriber-only but that I just unlocked and made free patreon.com/posts/13543995
ok, serious question: is there anyway a more famous person can publicly disagree with a less famous critic over something and litigate the validity of her take without it being considered targeted harassment?
External Tweet loading...
If nothing shows, it may have been deleted
by @sasimons view original on Twitter
I feel like the "targeted harassment" claim gets thrown around a little too loosely. Like what if he wrote a response article to her article and then tweeted about it?
Also, I think Che makes some legit good points about comedy bloggers and instead of addressing them they're just going with the "he's doing targeted harassment of a woman" thing which rubs me wrong, the optics of it