Máiréad Enright Profile picture
Sep 27, 2018 13 tweets 3 min read Read on X
Today is a good day to talk about decriminalisation of abortion after #repealedthe8th #legisl8
Under gov proposals it is an offence for a doctor to perform an abortion except as prescribed by law.
An offence attracting a penalty of between 12 mths in prison/Class A fine to 14 years. (So gov contemplates breaches from the minor to those where one or more women is seriously injured or killed)
The offence as defined doesn’t make reference to harm to the woman (eg forced abortion) or to ‘backstreet’ abortion. It could also catch terminations within the health service where the woman’s consent is free and informed.
(The JOC’s report by the way was focused on using criminal law to avoid abortion provision outside the health service.)
Now if you look at things from a doctor’s perspective this is worrying because the offence is performing a termination or terminations outside the scope of an ambiguous law.
A doctor might well think that if they don’t date a pregnancy accurately, or struggle with the “serious harm to health” ground then the guards might come knocking.
A lawyer would say yes, but the draft legislation clearly says a doctor has a defence if they act in “good faith” and the decision is “reasonable” (meets the ordinary standard of care applied by doctors in cases of the kind being treated).
Will that message secure doctors’ confidence? Or will we see repetition of the chilling effects we saw pre the PLDPA, and with the PLDPA itself where ambiguous language (remember “real and substantial risk”?) was not enough to reassure doctors and care was delayed/denied?
It would be better by far to decriminalise abortion completely. With the 8th gone, who’s to say the constitution requires it?
Alternatively, @SimonHarrisTD should consider much more narrowly drawn offences clearly designed to protect women from specific harms, leaving doctors to get on with their demanding new job.
@SimonHarrisTD Providers will be worried about stings, being reported by colleagues, risking reputations and livelihoods. Why risk women’s care to send a stigmatising criminalising message about abortion?

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Máiréad Enright

Máiréad Enright Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @maireadenright

Jul 12, 2018
If I had a vote in October, I would probably vote to remove 41.2. But it is disappointing that repeal is the only choice being offered.
41.2 has 2 parts - the fairly offensive 'women in the home' provision, and the half-useful in theory/useless in practice 'promise' of economic support for women in the home.
It's a double whammy of Catholic social teaching - we confine women to the private sphere and we ensure the state won't force you to leave it. But as for positive economic supports, you are only entitled to marriage or charity.
Read 12 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(