2/ In truth, @ClintonFdn is MUCH less complicated than @generalelectric or #Enron--no donor should rely on ANY accounting work performed on any part of this FAKE charity network since 23 October 1997 and @BKDLLP@AICPA must ask TOUGH questions of @EricHansenCPA @csthetrith
3/ How many donors, professional advisors, others overlooked OBVIOUS CHARITY FRAUDS at @ClintonFdn, thinking that playing along was a "cheap" way to get on the correct side of @HillaryClinton ? @csthetruth
4/ A word to the wise among lawyers to @BKDLLP, check very closely particulars of all @ClintonFdn (including affiliates) grant recipients to find as yet undisclosed defects including private gain and inurement--not "independent", more like active co-conspirator @csthetruth
5/ Also examine "independence" of ALL @ClintonFdn TRUSTEES--what private benefits did Pryor, Rutherford, Mills, Clintons derive through operating this FAKE charity network? (hint: Mindspirit LLC, Laureate, Clinton School of "Public Service" deanships amd MUCH more @csthetruth
6/ Disclosures about BoA, Metropolitan, Titanium (conflicts, Saban, Johnson) debts in 2003 and 4 forward deserve close scrutiny @BKDLLP@AICPA--cash flows statements are BOLDLY FRAUDULENT, good luck defending these, later public filings @csthetruth
7/ Why are ZERO government inflows disclosed for a supposed "public charity" through 2007, and what about related party revenue disclosures 2004 (Clinton Foundation HIV/AIDS Initiative, Inc.) and others going forward?--not consolidated, no consistency, so HOGWASH @csthetruth
8/ Try crosschecking UNITAID Gates Foundation other major donor disclosures (US and UK Children's Fund Foundations) with Schedule B disclosures for @ClintonFdn and affiliates @BKDLLP management representation letters unlikely to help you much @csthetruth
9/ Why is there no 990 for 1997? What were the "special projects" in 2003? Why did a @BKDLLP@ClintonFdn person leave, sue? How closely did you check ALL foreign operations? Who examined particulars of @BillClinton LAUREATE $17.6 million deal starting 2010? EXPLAIN? @csthetruth
10/ The BOARD of @AICPA must ask @EricHansenCPA PROBING QUESTIONS about MASSIVE DEFECTS in @BKDLLP "audit" work and EVIDENT CONTROL FAILURES at numerous @ClintonFdn FAKE CHARITIES from 1997 onwards--MANY ARE WATCHING TICK TOCK @csthetruth
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/ Read this and think carefully about @ClintonFdn KNOWN FACTS @csthetruth : “... A [CPA] member shall be considered to have knowingly misrepresented facts in violation of Rule 102 [ET sec. 102 par. .01] when he or she knowingly:...
2/ "a. Makes, or permits or directs another to make, materially false and misleading entries in an entity’s financial statements or records; " @csthetruth
3/ "or b. Fails to correct an entity’s financial statements or records that are materially false and misleading when he or she has the authority to record an entry;" @csthetruth
2/ On 16 November 2015, the @ClintonFdn INCORRECTLY refiled IRS returns for 2010, 2011, and 2012, and filed a false and materially misleading return for 2013 @csthetruth@realDonaldTrump
3/ Not a lawyer or tax accountant, but I believe @ClintonFdn should have filed "short period" return for 1997, a key moment, and that this could mean ALL previous years remain open for examination @realDonaldTrump@csthetruth
1/ While Lois Lerner was bottling things up at the FEC, a FAKE charity called "The Clinton Legal Expense Trust" registered in MD in 1998 using FEIN 52-6897794, and MD CID 3784 @csthetruth
2/ In 1998, when the FAKE @ClintonFdn declared $ ZERO in spending on "program service expenditures:, the FAKE Clinton Legal Expense Trust, run by CF Director David Pryor claimed program service expenses of $2,600,000, more than 3X what @CorrineBrownCon is now in PRISON 4 5 yrs!
3/ The FAKE charity "Clinton Legal Expense Trust" had two lawyers working in it--Peter Lavallee and Anthony Essaye, supposedly soliciting from DC where, no doubt, IRS/DOJ/DC SWAMPRATS covered up ILLEGAL MASSIVE MAIL BASED CHARITY FRAUD, while @BillClinton fought IMPEACHMENT
1/ Think of the number of people who know details concerning as yet unprosecuted @ClintonFdn FRAUDS---how many of these have been cooperating with state, federal, foreign governments @csthetruth?
2/ Then think of the number of accounting firms and professional advisers (especially including law firms) that enabled or conspired to cover up the @ClintonFdn FRAUDS, "thinking" perhaps that @HillaryClinton would be a "bankable", malleable president
3/ Then consider how many governments, crooked donors, and hackers may have penetrated abysmal "control systems" at @ClintonFdn and affiliated "charities" to become aware of CROOKED, multiparty FRAUDS and CORRUPTION
1/ Want to know some fun FACTS that shatter the notion the @ClintonFdn is about to reboot and soar again? First consider this ROFLMAO piece that editors did not check carefully enough: freebeacon.com/politics/clint…
2/ On/about 2 November 2013, "directors" of the @ClintonFdn illegally attempted to transfer control of a public charity and 509(A)(1) to @BillClinton@HillaryClinton@ChelseaClinton via a dramatic change in ByLaws--many laws prohibit this for many excellent reason
3/ Though state, federal, and foreign charity/solicitation laws require PROMPT, FULL, FAIR, ACCURATE disclosures to the public of MATERIAL changes, 2 graduates of Yale LIE School decided to attempt hiding their plainly illegal COUP ATTEMPT over a charity that MUST BE INDEPENDENT!
1/ GE is trading down in a strong market in the final week of the 1st Quarter--Republicans and Democrats should UNITE in DEMANDING CLAWBACKS of OBSCENE pay to @JeffImmelt and his cronies @csthetruth
2/ If Joe DiGenova and his wife have conflicts defending @realDonaldTrump why don't Rod Rosenstein (he missed @ClintonFdn FRAUDS while at Justice (2001-5) and Mueller (11 Sep 2001 through 2013) also have DISQUALIFYING CONFLICTS? @csthetruth@seanhannity
3/ So @theresa_may why is the U.K. FAILING to police EPIC @ClintonFdn FRAUDS and sending more than $200 million to improperly organized, FAKE "charities"? Is your charity regulator PURPOSEFULLY "gamed"? You are about to be seriously cheesed off!