External Tweet loading...
If nothing shows, it may have been deleted
by @hmacbe view original on Twitter
Eurozone countries don't have monetary autonomy or even absolute control over their banks. Canada does.
Japan's population is demographically very old and thus intolerant of inflation. Canada's isn't.
The US real estate bubble was localized.
Vegas, Phoenix, and South Florida went nuts while Texas slept through it. #VanRE and GTA are important enough to get a coordinated response at the national level.
The banking market is extremely concentrated which allows the TBTF policy of suspending mark-to-market on bank assets a real option.
Their oil, metal-bending, and forestry sectors would get a big boost if/when they devalue. Also the FDI that fuels this mess gets a boost because in their home currencies the homes become cheaper to buy.
The riddle is easy to solve.
They (soft) devalue the Canadian Dollar through negative interest rates. If a vacant home can be financed with a positive carry then prices won't fall by much. This process socializes losses.
The financial system is absolutely drowning in debt which suppresses interest rates, meanwhile we have real inflationary pressure both through the real economy and federal deficits. (Thread)
Back of the envelope math shows deep problems in capital heavy industries if nominal rates keep rising even if real rates are negative.
$AVB recently sold non CBD apartment buildings for 4.7% cap rate. Rising rates will obliterate the new buyers.
Rates affect asset PRICES while inflation affects asset revenues and expenses.
Say an apartment building earns $1m in NOI and is valued at $21.25m (4.7% cap), and rates and inflation both rise by 1%. The building would be worth $17.7 (yikes).
My investing philosophy is built around nothing.
Nearly every bad investor that I've ever met has started with an investing thesis that somehow relates back to a theoretical investment process. While I have mental processes, they're incoherent.
I look at momentum sometimes and sometimes I ignore it.
If I'm bottom fishing a cyclical stock then I want to see it up 50% from its low before I take a bite.
When I'm buying into a wonderful business I ignore it.
I both buy and short companies that are undervalued on a sum of the parts valuation basis. These are usually value traps, but exceptions abound. If management is mediocre or better and the company makes some money I occasionally bite. I'm long $TRCO for that reason.
Capitalism really only works one way. Companies with revenue declines over almost always have terrible returns.
(Thread)
Fixed costs are... fixed or sticky.
Interest expense can't be lowered without paying down debt or restructuring. Leases and locations can't be abandoned without significant costs.
Pension expense can't be lowered without bankruptcy.
Workers lose productivity as layoffs are faster or slower than work reductions. A situation for which there is no remedy.
If a company is merely overvalued it should appreciate more slowly than the market over time. Over a long time horizon the returns will still be positive if there is no other problem. These shorts must be matched against longs.
The fraudulent company:
As a matter of course these shorts are excruciating. In essence you are betting that a master criminal fails at some point and can't find new cult members.
Until the cat is out of the bag the stocks behave like STRONG compounders.