cnn.com/2017/11/29/pol…
#RogerStone 's official stament on the above story
Randy Credico is a good man. He's extraordinarily talented and has come back from personal adversity. (1)

He often uses street theater and satire to illustrate the hypocrisy of our current drug laws and in his fight for prison reform. He is a fighter for Justice.cThe Committee is wasting their time. He merely confirmed what Assange had said publicly. He was correct. (2)

Wikileaks did have the goods on Hillary and they did release them.

Credico's three interviews of Julian Assange on WBAI are an example of excellent radio journalism. (3)

I initially declined to identify Randy to the Committee fearing that exposure would be used to hurt his professional career and because our conversation was off-the-record and he is a journalist. (4)

Indeed when his name surfaced, as my source he was fired at WBAI Radio where he had the highest rated show.
I told the committee
"...In both the interview and in the follow-up email from House Majority counsel, the Committee requested I disclose the name of my source (5)

who confirmed the June 21 tweet and remarks by Julian Assange . Since my Committee interview and the receipt of written communication from the Committee, I, Mr. Stone have contemplated the disclosure and am now prepared only reluctantly to identify my source. (6)

The gentleman who confirmed for Mr. Stone the accuracy of Julian Assange’s interview of June 12, 2016 with the British ITV network, where Assange said he had “e-mails related to Hillary Clinton which are pending publication,” is Randy Credico, (7)

a long time New York based activist turned host of a WBAI radio show.
Mr. Stone noticed Credico had traveled to London on at least two occasions and conducted two landmark interviews with Julian Assange on WBAI. (8)

To be absolutely clear, Credico was only asked to confirm for Mr. Stone that the postings and interviews by Assange in which he claimed to have the Clinton data, both of June 21, were accurate. Mr. Credico never said he knew or had any information as to source or (9)

content of the material. Mr. Credico never said he confirmed this information with Mr. Assange himself. Mr. Stone knew Credico had his own sources within Wikileaks and is credible. Credico turned out to be 100 % accurate. (10)

As recently confirmed by Assange to reporter, #AmyGoodman “He [Stone] didn’t say anything that I hadn’t been saying in public at the time.”
Mr. Stone also had and has no knowledge regarding the source of this material, nor does Mr. Stone know who at WikiLeaks may have (11)

confirmed this information for Credico. This might explain WikiLeaks’ denial of the existence of an intermediary. Mr. Stone believes Credico to be sincere, credible and sought to protect Credico based upon reprisals Credico might suffer if his identity were disclosed. (12)

Since Mr. Stone’s September appearance, speculators have disclosed Credico as the possible intermediary and Credico has been terminated at WBAI Radio.
Neither Mr. Stone or Mr. Credico will concede that Assange is a Russian asset or that Wikleaks is anything but a news outlet (13)

who's accuracy and the veracity of the material they have published have never been challenged ............. (fin) #GetMeRogerStone #Infowars