Currently on a road trip in a rented Dodge Caravan and y’all whoever designed this car needs to delete their account
How do you have the Norman doors version of A/C controls? Why do these dials look like buttons? Why am I still trying to press these dials?! THEY LOOK LIKE BUTTONS, BUT AREN’T!
And why is there a spatial lag on where the rear seat A/C controls are located? No one wants other people’s arms snaking up beside them
Also, this light? How tf are you supposed to selectively turn this on while inside the car with the doors closed? WHY CAN’T I TURN THIS LIGHT ON?!
It’s literally a zero-sum equation for rear seat lights. All cabin lights have to be turned on JUST for back row lights? #nope#nothankyou
And why aren’t there any outlets under or on the backside of the center console? Was this van made in 1973?
Tried to recline the seat. I now know what bugs feel like when being eaten by Venus fly traps
I like Dodge, but this Dodge Caravan be like:
unroll
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/ Many disconcerting things here: 1. That third-party/media reporting may be more effective and trustworthy than university HR or TIX offices; 2. That cautionary whisper networks may have some degree of selection bias on who is or is not informed about whom to avoid;
2/ 3. The use of “x told y person within z amount of time” as proof of the veracity or plausibility of harassment claims (not all cases have this, but those cases are still equally valid); 4. That double-digit victim numbers seems to be critical mass for “university response;”
3/ Dominguez’ repulsive behavior went on for nearly FOUR DECADES (1979-2015)? That’s far too long for those at the top to have been oblivious
1/ In defense of pop culture in intellectual pursuits
External Tweet loading...
If nothing shows, it may have been deleted
by @tabloidarthist view original on Twitter
2/ I presented this paper by @msalganik, @peterdodds, @duncanjwatts (2006) in a doctoral-level methods course on network analysis at UCLA. Authors are highly respected, paper has over a thousand citations:
3/ It would’ve been a disservice to Salganik et al (2006) if slide titles weren’t used for punny references to pop song titles or the music biz:
**For @CommonApp applicants, admissions decisions may be subject to evaluation of conviction record for felony or misdemeanors in violation of DC statutes including, but not limited to Title 22 § 4, 8A, 8B, 9B, 13, 18, 19A, 22, 27A, 31B, 33, 36, 36A, etc.
External Tweet loading...
If nothing shows, it may have been deleted
by @uclaadmission view original on Twitter
1/ I rarely comment on the gun control debate. I support reasonable, effective gun control. Yet, some liberals seem all too happy to dogpile on tribalistic virtue-signalling via backhanded insults to law-abiding gun owners:
2/ Many of these gun owners (my rural family included) also support gun law reform. Lobbing petty insults betrays: (a) dearth of knowledge on guns/current gun law; (b) refusal to see gun ownership as part of a valid cultural identity; (c) rabid desire to dehumanize “those people”
3/ All of these are equally problematic and divisive. So as a Mossberg 500-loving, blue state-residing, liberal Southerner who wants to see legislative reform of gun control, I say to other liberals – stop it