2/I continue to receive regular tweets, blog comments, and the occasional email from people who tell me that economists are charlatans because of the failure to predict the 2008 crisis.
External Tweet loading...
If nothing shows, it may have been deleted
by @tyillc view original on Twitter
3/But even a cursory glance at the #ASSA2018 hashtag, which displays presentations and papers from the biggest econ convention, will show that most economists are NOT doing what the critics seem to think they're doing.
For example...
4/Here are economists studying gender in the workplace.
11/Here are economists studying the link between wages and company size.
External Tweet loading...
If nothing shows, it may have been deleted
by @fr_hossain view original on Twitter
12/Here are economists studying race, education and crime.
External Tweet loading...
If nothing shows, it may have been deleted
by @Noahpinion view original on Twitter
13/Here are economists studying automation and the future of jobs.
External Tweet loading...
If nothing shows, it may have been deleted
by @mioana view original on Twitter
14/Here are economists studying consumer financial behavior.
External Tweet loading...
If nothing shows, it may have been deleted
by @BenjaminBeranek view original on Twitter
15/Here are economists studying wage stagnation.
External Tweet loading...
If nothing shows, it may have been deleted
by @stephen_tapp view original on Twitter
16/Here are economists studying alternative ways to measure human well-being.
External Tweet loading...
If nothing shows, it may have been deleted
by @KeeslerWelch view original on Twitter
17/Here are economists studying inequality and its relation to global growth.
External Tweet loading...
If nothing shows, it may have been deleted
by @JustinSandefur view original on Twitter
18/Here are economists studying the history of inequality.
External Tweet loading...
If nothing shows, it may have been deleted
by @NinjaEconomics view original on Twitter
19/Here are economists studying multiple types of inequality.
External Tweet loading...
If nothing shows, it may have been deleted
by @schoid view original on Twitter
20/OK, enough. If you want more, check out the #ASSA2018 hashtag or the conference program (which has downloadable abstracts and papers): aeaweb.org/conference/201…
I think I've made my point.
21/Macroeconomic forecasting is only a tiny, tiny piece of what economists do.
Even the study of recessions itself is only a small piece of the profession.
22/The whole shtick of calling economics a pseudoscience, charlatanic, etc. based on failed macro forecasts is wearing very thin.
External Tweet loading...
If nothing shows, it may have been deleted
by @t0nyyates view original on Twitter
23/British newspapers like the @guardian and the @Telegraph need to stop publishing these blanket denunciations of the economics profession that are focused on macro, or macro forecasting.
It's just getting ridiculous.
24/Also, note that the #ASSA2018 papers I cited (and a great many of those I didn't cite!) give the lie to several other standard criticisms of econ, for example:
* econ assumes perfect rationality
* econ doesn't care about inequality
* econ doesn't care about happiness
etc.
25/There are legitimate criticisms to be made of the econ profession - sexism, too much inclusion of pointless theory sections in papers, publication bias, bad benchmark models in some fields, etc. etc.
But the standard Guardian/Telegraph-style broadside should go extinct now.
26/If you're going to criticize econ, criticize the real thing, not the typical, worn-out, inaccurate caricature.
(end)
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
"Noah" is at the point where it's a common enough name where there are lots of Noahs around, but still uncommon enough that people get us confused a lot.
I keep feeling guilty about being mistaken for Noah Feldman and angry about being mistaken for Noah Berlatsky...
Then there's that guy Noah Smith who does computer science at the University of Washington, who is way handsomer and more successful than I am...but nobody mistakes me for him because I'm much louder and more online... :D
2/Sokal hoaxes are funny pranks - at least I find them funny.
And they probably do point to an important problem in academia - the "publish or perish" ethos that forces many academics to publish low-quality papers, often (though not always) in low-ranked journals.
3/Our country has decided that research is the mark of a good professor, but the demand for professors as teachers far outstrips the supply of good research to be done.
So tons of profs spend their time doing useless signaling.
Here's a picture of how the Brown-Khanna plan would change the EITC. It's a very big expansion, but the cost ($140B/yr) is worth it, given how effective this program is at fighting poverty.
Another idea is to add a modest Universal Basic Income to the EITC. That would keep the EITC's work incentive, but would also provide much-needed income support to people who can't work.
1/Here's a thread about why it kind of annoys me when people talk about "elites" in America.
I don't think the American elite is unified. I think what we have are a bunch of different elites that often don't even talk to each other or like each other that much.
2/Here are some groups in America who might reasonably be called "elites": 1. Tech industry businesspeople 2. D.C. lawyers and politicos 3. NYC finance people 4. Hollywood people 5. Academics at universities scattered throughout the country 6. Writers 7. CEOs
3/Now, the first thing to notice is the geographic separation between these clusters of elites.
Tech people in SF try to keep track of what D.C. lawyers are thinking and vice versa, but...it doesn't usually seem to work out that well. And the cultures are VERY different.