This week: 1 James Dobson encouraged Christians to fast & pray for the protection a serial sex abuser (Trump). 2 When a mega-church pastor's criminal sexual assault was exposed, he received a standing ovation from his congregation. 3 One of Roy Moore's victims' house burned down.
All of these stories point to why I'm sadly pessimistic about a #metoo-style cultural shift in evangelical Christianity (and, to an extent, the broader Church). I'm pessimistic because of the deadly combination of patriarchy & (as discussed recently) evangelical exceptionalism...
As I've stated before, evangelical exceptionalism understands "the world" or "the culture" to be filled with darkness & sin, teeming with people who are "lost," and evangelicalism & evangelicals to be the sole bearers of light, the counter-cultural path to salvation...
...White evangelicals perceive "the world" to struggle with racism & sexual immorality, but not themselves. Because of this, it's rare to see serious efforts made at examining the ways racism & toxic masculinity/patriarchy are embedded in evangelical culture...
...You see this so clearly in the fact that Andy Savage's church rejects LGBT people, yet gives their abusive pastor a standing ovation! (This points to the reality that anti-LGBT sentiment is usually more about prejudice than a commitment to "sexual purity.")...
The fact is, evangelical culture (and, generally speaking, the Church culture at large) remains mired in patriarchy. So someone who is perceived as a "man of God" doing "God's work" will almost always be protected over women & children. It happens all. the. time.
When Savage's victim came forward, who did she face? Who was in charge of her church? Men. All men. When churches sideline women from leadership, a culture of patriarchy is inevitable and toxic, abusive masculinity flourishes.
But you won't see many churches challenging patriarchy or abuse or toxic masculinity in Christian culture. Instead, you hear sermon after sermon railing against immodesty, cohabitation, sex before marriage, LGBT people - all those real or perceived "sins of the culture"...
In order to turn #metoo into #churchtoo, the Church in America, and specifically evangelicals, are going to have to muster some humility and take a serious look at how patriarchy, sexism, and toxic masculinity have infected their culture...
It's great to see women like @BethMooreLPM & @KayWarren1 speaking out. But as long as church leadership & evangelical culture are dominated by men (who believe God wants it that way!) I fear the voices of women & victims will not be heard and nothing will change.
TLDR version: In the name of Jesus, smash the damn patriarchy. / End thread.
So I feel like this thread was too pessimistic and Oprah says we should be hopeful. So some hopeful thoughts: While the Church in America is perhaps not positioned to lead the charge against sexual harassment & toxic masculinity...
...there are some significant generational differences within the Church, including evangelicalism, that suggest attitudes are changing on gender & sexuality. I'm hopeful this means more introspective conversations about consent, inclusion, & patriarchy in the near future.
Also, our present cultural moment, as tough as it's been, seems to have emboldened some voices of dissent among evangelical women. If evangelicals yield to their wisdom, there's hope.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Since it’s come up lately: In my experience, it can be helpful to highlight similarities in the argumentation/justification used to prop up systems of oppression, but not so helpful to compare the nature of that oppression. For example...
..I think it can be useful to highlight how some of the same passages of Scripture (NT household codes) that are used to support patriarchy were also use to support slavery. But I would very be wary of comparing the oppression of American chattel slavery with complementarianism.
*be very wary* (although “very be wary” is a fun thing we could start saying).
2/3 I feel like I have more in common, in terms of values and worldview, with people of other faiths who seek justice and oppose this administration’s racism, misogyny, and corruption, than with those conservative evangelicals who have embraced Trumpism...
3/3 I’m not saying this is good or bad (and I’m not challenging Michael, just using his tweet as a conversation-starter), it’s just a reality I live in now, and I’m wondering if others feel the same.
Unpopular Opinion (at least on Twitter): Sometimes people say the “wrong” thing in an attempt to connect and there should be grace for that.
Okay, context: Yesterday at the park, a lady was chatting with me about the baby and she asked some questions & made some comments (about childbirth & babies) that would undoubtedly get criticized and mocked here if I shared them...
...But it was obvious to me that she was just a woman alone on a walking track who wanted to connect with another woman and her cute baby. I could get all offended or I could welcome her interest. I guess I just see so much policing of conversations these days....
Thread: Been thinking about this tweet and the conversation that follows, and it’s led to some internal recalibrating regarding how I employ claims of a “consistent pro-life ethic.” Because I’m not consistent...
...Most of is aren’t. Because life ethics are actually way more complicated and uncertain than many of us want to admit. Does being “consistently pro-life” mean I have to be a pacifist? Does it mean I’m a hypocrite if I’m not an organ donor? Must I protest against IVF?
There was a Christianity Today piece a few weeks ago arguing in support of evangelicals as “inconsistently pro-life.” It was roundly mocked by progressive Christians, but I found myself agreeing with some of what the author said about...
I don’t think it’s overdramatic to call for prayer & support for members of the press. Imitating Putin, the President of the United States is doubling-down on the “enemy of the people” language, overtly declaring war on the free press. This is dangerous & frightening. Resist.
Yes, the abuse of migrant children, the threats to healthcare and civil rights, and the rampant corruption are perhaps more serious than this fight with the media, but we’ll never know the truth about those things without a free press. That’s why he’s aiming at them.
In Russia, journalists who report the truth about Putin often wind up dead. It is not hyperbolic to say that with his recent rhetoric, the president wants to turn our country in the same direction.
Imagine for a moment if the president said “Christians are the enemy of the people.” Imagine if he lied and said millions of Christians are voting illegally and “raping women at rates you wouldn’t believe.” Imagine if he banned Christians from serving in the military...
...Imagine if he pressured the NFL to fire Christian players who prayed before the game and at a rally yelled “drag those sons of bitches off the field!” Imagine if he said at a rally, “If you see a Christian, punch him in the face. I’ll pay the medical bills”...
...Imagine if his administration so obviously discriminated against Christians, its new travel restrictions were known as The Christian Ban. Imagine if he said Christians came from “shithole countries”....