But a pharmacist right? You should know the importance of valid clinical trials compared to unfavourable or inconclusive results? The latter doesn't disprove the null, y'know.

If you find out drug trial results are unfavourable or worse, do you continue selling it? Thalidomide?

You see this is the thing, if you don't understand that parallel, given the control group is Remain and you have a statistical threshold you have to meet (confidence intervals anyone?) you can't even be a good pharmacist! That's fundamental to what pharmacy studies.

You couldn't assess efficacy, peer-review studies or make determinations on risk without that skill. When I say I would have fired folk for voting leave, I definitely would! You're plainly demonstrating an incapability to do your job effectively. Firing for incapability is legit.

So again, pharmacist you say? Do you sell your own drugs?

Read the rest of the thread Ed Vining. Then maybe I'll tell you a story about NICE. Your 'Most'=many, not most.

You may consider it a daft example Ed, but I'll ask again, because apparently, you're a pharmacist. What was the Thalidomide incident a precursor to, in the UK?

So Ed Vining couldn't take the cross-examination heat and has gone for the block :-D

#Snowflake