Supreme Court Observer Profile picture
Feb 8, 2018 14 tweets 7 min read Twitter logo Read on Twitter
#Aadhaar Day 9; Session 1 - @KapilSibal begins with reading a newspaper report abt, how ppl are being denied pension because of Aadhaar. Justice Bhushan enquires - if there are so many problems with Aadhaar, then why 1.2 billion ppl have enrolled for it? #scobserver,
replies that difference between enrolment and requirement of authentication each time. Authentication requirement continuously leads to exclusion, which is a ground for challenging Aadhar. J. Bhushan seems non-convinced. #scobserver
J. Chandrachud says that exclusion can be because of 2 factors - lack of infrastructure and biological factor like old age. Observes that government can upgrade infrastructure. ASG Tushar Mehta questions claim of exclusion due to Aadhaar. #scobserver #Aadhaar
Bench asks ASG to explain further. Counsel Rakesh Dwivedi says that there are statutory mechanisms to ensures that people are not excluded because of Aadhar. Cites S.7 of Aadhar Act where in case of authentication problem, person can show the card and number #scobserver
cont., Rakesh Dwivedi addressing the point about old age submits that provision for exception to be made for ppl who cant provide biometric info. Says that Aadhar does not lead to exclusion either at enrolment or authentication stage #scobserver #Aadhaar
ASG Tushar Mehta argues that 96% ppl enrolled under Aadhar. Govt has taken steps to ensure that there is no exclusion for lack of infrastructure or Aadhaar card. #scobserver #Aadhaar
continues with S.7 argument - says that high possibility of exclusion if people are not able to authenticate their biometrics. . J. Sikri replies that S.7 can be interpreted in manner where if authentication fails, then proof of enrolment can be given. #scobserver,
cont. Kapil Sibal submits that it would amount to adding "or" in S.7. J. Chandrachud says that section can be interpreted so that there is no exclusion. #scobserver, #Aadhaar
moves to discussing UK Biometric Identity Project, which was scrapped in 2010. Argues that Aadhar claims to achieve the same objective - detect illegal migration, fight terrorism and prevent identity fraud for welfare. Reads various objections to UK Project by MPs.
argues that there is distinction between social security cards and Aadhar. Says Aadhaar is "identity+" J. Chandrachud asks - what is "plus". replies "plus"is metadata. #Aadhar #scobserver
Then @KapilSibal says that Sec.3,4,8,57 in addition toS.7 need to be struck down. Argues, S.57 allows making Aadhaar mandatory for non-welfare services even by private parties. Says that even if Sec.7 not there, then State can make Aadhar compulsory under different Statues (cont.
like Food Security Act through Sec.57. Assails Aadhaar Act by telling that all proofs of identity, which are otherwise acceptable are excluded by Act. J. Sikri disagrees - says that alternate identity proofs allowed at stage of enrolment. #Aadhar
asks that what is the logic of allowing alternate id proofs for enrolment but not for identification. #scobserver #Aadhar
summarises for bench - ID card can be there but authentication should be optioned, data should be on card and citizens should have choice in alternatives. Bench rises. @KapilSibal to continue on Tuesday(13.02.2018)

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh

Keep Current with Supreme Court Observer

Supreme Court Observer Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!


Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @scobserver

Sep 6, 2018
What are the possible options before the #SupremeCourt? Maxamilist, lean maximalist, minimalist...
See our pre-judgement matrix #Section377 #SCObserver…
The 5-judge Bench assembled at 11.30 to announce its judgement on #Section377. #CJIDipakMisra is reading the judgement. There are four concurring opinions
#Section377 has been struck down. #CJI says, 'it is irrational and manifestly arbitrary'
Read 9 tweets
Feb 13, 2018
Day 10; Session 1- Kapil Sibal (KS ) :continues with arguments against Aadhaar. Compares Aadhar ID with National ID for Israel and points out that in Israel, information can be used only for purpose they are collected. No provision for metadata. #scobserver @KapilSibal
KS : Reads from Puttaswamy judgment (Right to Privacy case) which says that Information is power. Refers to very expensive acquisition of Whatsapp by Facebook to argue that these services are highly valued because of information access. #scobserver
cont -services like Whatsapp,Facebook,Uber have data but in silos unlike Aadhar, where all data are stored in centralised database and that makes it dangerous. In silos, the information is consequential, but under centralised database, it provides personality mapping.#scobserver
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!


0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy


3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!