Re: Trump's SNAP plan: In the interest of full disclosure, you all should probably know that there existed (or exists, who knows) a very well written essay I wrote roughly around 2000 that made a very internally logical argument for allowing the children of the poor to starve...
if their parents refused to work, and to turn over all food assistance to private charity. At the time, I worshipped at the altar of Rand and Von Mises and I hadn't yet begun to evaluate the empirical evidence that showed their point of view was not only evil and cruel (which I
should have known on the face of it, but didn't due to cognitive dissonance) but also counter productive.

I have spent much of the intervening 17 years making up for my (not so) youthful assholishness (I was roughly 30 at the time).
The point of this preamble is that I was wrong, and Trump is *just* as wrong in his idea of a box of shelf stable goods (minus fresh goods and vegetables) sent from some central (presumably private, presumably for profit or skimming) distribution point. FDR tried the box concept
when Food Stamps first were implemented, and it was a resounding failure. Despite advances in technology of distribution systems, many of the same reasons still exist today. I'm going to make an attempt at beginning to enumerate them for you.
First, the "no fresh fruits and vegetables" things drastically hurts three populations 1) The population of people who receive SNAP benefits and will have even less access to healthy veggies. 2) The small farmers and farmers markets that currently accept SNAP benefits and would
lose income due to this decision and 3) the employers who rely on low wage earners in their businesses, who will face increased absenteeism as their employees' diets get *even worse* (foods for poor people tend to be calorie dense and nutrient lean. Fresh fruits and veggies help
to alleviate this problem to some extent).

Second, the set up of a distribution system outside the existing grocery system to distribute these food boxes sets up problems of its own. First, it takes a substantial source of income from local and small chain grocers, and in
addition, the creation of another bureaucracy (or possibly contractor system) sets up the potential for fraud and abuse in a system that currently has only between 1-2% fraud. (Most people don't realize that most of the fraud is at the supply end and not at the recipient end.)
Given the nature of this particular administration, it is likely that the supply system will be riddled with appointees and/or contractors who are in it to enrich themselves, and not to provide a service to the country and the most vulnerable among us.
Finally, each family's nutritional and food related requirements is going to be far more individual than a standardized box (or even a small selection thereof) can provide. First and foremost are people with special nutritional needs. Diabetics, people with celiac disease,
obligate vegetarians who can't digest meats, or are vegetarian for religious or ethical reasons, those with food allergies, etc., will have their health endangered. In addition, the living situations of the poor vary widely. Some poor families are young adults with children, some
are intergenerational, some are elderly. Some live in inherited homes with all the kitchen supplies they need, while others live in hotel rooms, travel trailers and campsites with very little in the way of supplies. Many of the poor in this country lack decent education in home
economics (my mother is probably cheering from the afterlife at this shoutout to her profession) and don't have the *ability* to cook "poor folk food" even if they have the supplies and materials.

Finally, one thing the proposed standardized boxes take away that is utterly
irreplaceable is dignity. We have this assumption (a poor assumption, not backed by the empirical evidence) that people become poor and stay that way predominantly out of poor choices. The truth is that poverty can and does happen to people who make excellent choices. There are
institutional forces that can drag people into poverty even from the highest levels of society, including disability, racism and sexism (in their myriad impacts on our society), and violence (none of these are mutually exclusive). So because we believe poor people (especially
those whose mistakes are more obvious) "deserve" poverty. And in our paternalism, and lack of understanding of the forces of poverty, we set out to "protect" the poor "from the consequences of their mistakes". And sure, poor people make mistakes, and don't always make the perfect
choice with their food dollars -- and that's utterly beside the point, because the difference between poor people mistakes and rich people mistakes is that rich folk have more leeway to make worse mistakes without consequence, or with far less impactful consequences --
So when you take *even more* choice from the poor about how they are to feed themselves, not only do you endanger their physical well-being (at a *greater* financial cost than society is currently paying) but you also endanger their mental well-being. As a therapist who works
with a lot of people on public assistance, I can *see* the effects of assumptions that the poor are "less than" the rest of us. And I am only one person, and can do only so much to stem this tide. But if you agree with me on this, share this thread far and wide, and then each of
you write, or call, or fax, or email your representatives to ensure this garbage piece of this garbage budget never becomes law. In case you've forgotten, you can text "Resist" to 50409 and follow the instructions to reach all of your reps at once.
As some of y'all know, I am one of those currently sliding from middle class into poverty due to my husband's disability and my decision to put helping those in need over financial gain. You can find more of my writing at Feel free to become a patron if
you're so moved, or send a one time tip to (unless you're a therapy participant with me, or family member. I can't and won't accept pay outside of your fees for service for my writing). Keep #resisting and never give up.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh

Keep Current with Jenni, LCSW

Jenni, LCSW Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!


Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @odanu

Nov 30, 2017
1/ On mental health and #Resistance (a personal story) THREAD: I was, for a while, trying to do an essay or “tweet...
2/ For context, I own my own business and that takes easily 60 hours a week of my time. And since that business is a mental health therapy practice, I can’t just emotionally “check out” and go to work anyhow. I have to be fully “present”, to the best of my ability, when I work.
3/ On top of that, my husband has severe chronic pain issues and I have the majority of all the home tasks, in addition to helping him with his ADLs (activities of daily living) to allow him to keep working because we can’t afford for him to quit.
Read 36 tweets
Nov 16, 2017
1/ THREAD: This is the Resistbot (text "resist" to 50409) email I am sending today: //I am writing both of my Senators and my representative
2/ today with this email. First, I want to thank both Claire McCaskill and Emanuel Cleaver for standing with their constituents and not with
3/ hidden money funders who do not have the interests of the American people in mind. I want to thank you both for fighting to get CHIP
Read 38 tweets
Nov 11, 2017
1/ Veterans Day Thread: This is my first Veteran’s Day as a Blue Star mom. My son is still safe stateside, finishing his training, but by
2/ this time next year he’ll almost certainly be in the fleet, on his first deployment, deep in the belly of a submarine or aircraft
3/ carrier. I have a nephew who is also Navy. My brother served in the Air Force. I looked into military service, but my head injury when I
Read 30 tweets
Nov 10, 2017
1/ Roy Moore will probably win Alabama. He is credibly accused of having romantic or sexual involvement (it varies) with four teenaged girls
2/ in the late 1970s and early 1980s when he was in his early 30s. Only one of those girls was under the age of consent (16, then and now,
3/ in Alabama) but she is also the only one who reports feeling coerced toward sexual activity, with him guiding her hand to his erect
Read 27 tweets
Oct 12, 2017
1/ THREAD: Hey House GOP? You want to be Big Damn Heroes (#BigDamnHero) and win re-election? #ImpeachTrumpNow. I know a bunch of you are
2/ waiting to pass tax “reform” (more on that on another thread) before impeaching Trump. That’s a mistake, boys and girls. This thread is
3/ going to be interspersed with the names and Twitter handles of every GOP member of the House, and their state, to encourage your
Read 88 tweets
Oct 11, 2017
1/ THREAD: How to thwart the Russians (evening edition, reposted from this morning): Russian bots, Russian spies, Russian provocateurs.
2/ There is no doubt now that not only did Russians interfere in the US Presidential election of 2016, but continue to interfere daily in
3/ our democracy by stirring up divisions along the existing fault lines of race and culture that have existed since the beginning of the
Read 59 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!


0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy


3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!